SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gıda / 2026 / Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3

DETERMINATION OF MULTI-PESTICIDE RESIDUE PROFILE, MRL COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS, AND CUMULATIVE DIETARY EXPOSURE RISK ASSESSMENT IN CHERRY (*Prunus avium*) PRODUCTION BASINS OF ISPARTA PROVINCE, TÜRKİYE

TÜRKİYE’NİN ISPARTA İLİNDEKİ KİRAZ (*Prunus avium*) ÜRETİM HAVZALARINDA ÇOKLU PESTİSİT KALINTI PROFİLİ TESPİTİ, MRL UYGUNLUK ANALİZİ VE KÜMÜLATİF BESİN KAYNAKLI MARUZ KALMA RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Taner Erkaymaz(Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1939-3153
Ahmet Hakan Aktaş(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2327-4031
Journal
Gıda
Pages
584–602
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings revealed that 100% of samples contained at least two residues, with 93.3% harboring more than three.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates pesticide residue levels and cumulative health risks in sweet cherries (Prunus avium) cultivated in three ecologically distinct regions of Isparta (Eğirdir, Uluborlu, and Sav).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty samples from the June 2024 harvest were analyzed for over 400 active substances using QuEChERS extraction and LC-MS/MS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings revealed that 100% of samples contained at least two residues, with 93.3% harboring more than three.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Pestisit kalıntısı · kiraz · Prunus avium

Abstract

This study investigates pesticide residue levels and cumulative health risks in sweet cherries (Prunus avium) cultivated in three ecologically distinct regions of Isparta (Eğirdir, Uluborlu, and Sav). Thirty samples from the June 2024 harvest were analyzed for over 400 active substances using QuEChERS extraction and LC-MS/MS. Findings revealed that 100% of samples contained at least two residues, with 93.3% harboring more than three. Fifteen pesticides (8 fungicides, 7 insecticides) were identified, averaging 4.7±1.5 pesticides per sample. The highest detection frequencies were recorded for acetamiprid (93.3%), carbendazim/benomyl (76.7%), and spinetoram (43.3%). Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) exceedances were detected for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl. While total pesticide load showed no significant regional difference (P=0.49), acetamiprid concentrations varied significantly by location (P=0.034). Chronic risk assessment yielded Hazard Index (HI) values for adults (0.106) and children (0.494) were within safe limits. However, acetamiprid posed an unacceptable acute risk for children (%ARfD=287.2).

Özet

Bu çalışma, Isparta’nın (Eğirdir, Uluborlu, Sav) farklı ekolojik bölgelerinde yetiştirilen kirazlardaki (Prunus avium) pestisit kalıntı düzeylerini ve kümülatif sağlık risklerini incelemektedir. 2024 Haziran hasadından alınan 30 numune, QuEChERS ekstraksiyonu ve LC-MS/MS yöntemiyle 400'den fazla aktif madde için analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, numunelerin %100’ünün en az iki, %93.3’ünün ise üçten fazla kalıntı içerdiğini göstermiştir. Toplam 15 farklı pestisit (8 fungisit, 7 insektisit) tespit edilmiş; numune başına ortalama 4.7±1.5 kalıntı saptanmıştır. En yüksek frekansa sahip maddeler asetamiprid (%93.3), karbendazim/benomil (%76.7) ve spinetoramdı (%43.3). Karbendazim ve tiofanat-metil için maksimum kalıntı limitleri (MRL) aşılmıştır. Bölgeler arasında toplam pestisit yükü açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken (P=0.49), asetamiprid konsantrasyonu lokasyona göre varyasyon göstermiştir (P=0.034). Kronik risk değerlendirmesinde Tehlike Endeksi (HI) yetişkinler (0.106) ve çocuklar (0.494) için güvenli sınırlardadır. Ancak, asetamipridin çocuklar için kabul edilemez bir akut risk (%ARfD=287.2) oluşturduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erkaymaz, T., Aktaş, A. H., *, T. E. (2026). DETERMINATION OF MULTI-PESTICIDE RESIDUE PROFILE, MRL COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS, AND CUMULATIVE DIETARY EXPOSURE RISK ASSESSMENT IN CHERRY (*Prunus avium*) PRODUCTION BASINS OF ISPARTA PROVINCE, TÜRKİYE. Gıda, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3, 584–602. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD26033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akın, M., Eyduran, S., Çelik, Ş., Aliyev, P., Aykol, S. & Eyduran, E. (2021). Modeling and forecasting cherry production in Turkey. The Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 31(3), 773-781. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2021.3.0267
  2. Anonymous. (2026). Carbendazim Substance Regulatory Obligations. https://echa.europa.eu/fr/legislation-obligation/-/obligations/100.031.108?_euclefobligations_WAR_euclefportlet_substanceId=100.031.108
  3. Arias-Estévez, M., López-Periago, E., Martínez-Carballo, E., Simal-Gándara, J., Mejuto, J.-C. & García-Río, L. (2008). The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123(4), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.011
  4. Boon, P. E., Van der Voet, H., Van Raaij, M. T. M. & Van Klaveren, J. D. (2008). Cumulative risk assessment of the exposure to organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides in the Dutch diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(9), 3090-3098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.083
  5. Craig, P. S., Dujardin, B., Hart, A., Hernandez-Jerez, A. F., Bennekou, S. H., Kneuer, C. & Mohimont, L. (2020). Cumulative dietary risk characterisation of pesticides that have chronic effects on the thyroid. EFSA Journal, 18(4), 1-71. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6088 Daniel, C., Grunder, J. (2012). Integrated management of European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi (L.): Situation in Switzerland and Europe. Insects, 3(4), 956-988. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3040956 EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). (2016). Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance acetamiprid. EFSA Journal, 14(11), e04610. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4610
  6. EFSA, Bellisai, G., Bernasconi, G., Carrasco Cabrera, L., Castellan, I., del Aguila, M. & Zioga, E. (2025). Modification of the existing maximum residue level for acetamiprid in honey. EFSA Journal, 23(3), e9300. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9300
  7. EUR-Lex. (2002, January). Consolidated text: Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2002/178/2022-07-01
  8. EUR-Lex. (2020, November). European Parliament resolution of 26 November 2020 on the draft Commission implementing regulation approving carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 and 10 (D069099/01 — 2020/2852(RSP)).https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2021_425_R_0011
  9. EUR-Lex. (2024, September). European Parliament resolution of 18 September 2024 on the draft Commission regulation amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benomyl, carbendazim and thiophanate‐methyl in or on certain products (D089819/05 - 2024/2758(RPS)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2024-0006_EN.html
  10. Fantke, P., Juraske, R. (2013). Variability of pesticide dissipation half-lives in plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(8), 3548-3562. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303525x
  11. FAO. (2005, February). Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC050711
  12. FAOSTAT. (2026, March). Production statistics. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/commodities_by_country
  13. Handford, C. E., Elliott, C. T., Campbell, K. (2015). A review of the global pesticide legislation and the scale of challenge in reaching the global harmonization of food safety standards. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 11(4), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1635 Hernandez-Jerez, A., Coja, T., Paparella, M., Price, A., Henri, J., Focks, A., & Vianello, G. (2024). Statement on the toxicological properties and maximum residue levels of acetamiprid and its metabolites. EFSA Journal, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.2903/J.EFSA.2024.8759
  14. Jiang, D., Li, Q., Li, X., Sun, R. (2023). The Effect of Maximum Residue Limits on Agri-Food Trade: Evidence from Chinese Exports to the EU. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3-4), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.30430/GJAE.2023.0328
  15. Lehotay, S. J., Son, K. A., Kwon, H., Koesukwiwat, U., Fu, W., Mastovska, K. & Leepipatpiboon, N. (2010). Comparison of QuEChERS sample preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Journal of Chromatography A, 1217(16), 2548-2560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.044
  16. Lozowicka, B., Kaczynski, P., Paritova, А. Е., Kuzembekova, G. B., Abzhalieva, A. B., Sarsembayeva, N. B. & Alihan, K. (2014). Pesticide residues in grain from Kazakhstan and potential health risks associated with exposure to detected pesticides. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 64, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.038
  17. Mnif, W., Hassine, A. I. H., Bouaziz, A., Bartegi, A., Thomas, O. & Roig, B. (2011). Effect of endocrine disruptor pesticides: a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(6), 2265-2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8062265
  18. Turkish Food Codex. (2025, January). Turkish Food Codex: Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2025/01/20250107M1-1.htm