Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3

Combined Action of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles and Ciprofloxacin Against Staphylococcus aureus: Driving Mechanisms

Ayşenur Pamukçu(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES (INTERDISCIPLINARY))0000-0002-7650-4147
Emine Hilal Altintop(IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES (INTERDISCIPLINARY), BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES (INTERDISCIPLINARY) (DR) (ENGLISH))0009-0004-3766-1918
Didem Şen Karaman(İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Biomedical Engineering Department)0000-0002-2368-9598
Pages
644–659
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies should focus on optimizing nanoparticle formulations, evaluating in vivo efficacy, and assessing their clinical translation to address the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rise of antimicrobial resistance has intensified the need for alternative strategies to enhance antibiotic efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mechanistic investigations revealed that CeO₂ NPs disrupted bacterial membrane integrity, induced oxidative stress through ROS overproduction, and significantly prolonged bacterial doubling time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies should focus on optimizing nanoparticle formulations, evaluating in vivo efficacy, and assessing their clinical translation to address the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antibacterial activity · Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO₂ NPs) · Ciprofloxacin

Abstract

The rise of antimicrobial resistance has intensified the need for alternative strategies to enhance antibiotic efficacy. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO₂ NPs) have shown promise as antimicrobial agents; however, their potential in combination with antibiotics remains underexplored. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the synergistic antibacterial effects of CeO₂ NPs with ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus , we conducted detailed mechanistic investigations. CeO₂ NPs were synthesized using a non- isothermal precipitation method and characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Antibacterial activity was evaluated through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays. Mechanistic studies included bacterial growth curve analysis, ROS quantification, and SEM imaging of treated bacterial cells. CeO₂ NPs exhibited an additive effect with ciprofloxacin, reducing its MIC by threefold. Mechanistic investigations revealed that CeO₂ NPs disrupted bacterial membrane integrity, induced oxidative stress through ROS overproduction, and significantly prolonged bacterial doubling time. SEM analysis confirmed extensive structural damage, including cell wall disruption and cytoplasmic leakage. These findings highlight the dual antibacterial role of CeO₂ NPs: direct bacterial damage and enhancement of ciprofloxacin's efficacy. CeO₂ NPs hold potential as antibiotic adjuvants to combat resistant Gram-positive infections. Further studies should focus on optimizing nanoparticle formulations, evaluating in vivo efficacy, and assessing their clinical translation to address the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Pamukçu, A., Altintop, E. H., Karaman, D. Ş. (2026). Combined Action of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles and Ciprofloxacin Against Staphylococcus aureus: Driving Mechanisms. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 644–659. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1846849

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. . Skwarczynski M, Bashiri S, Yuan Y, Ziora ZM, Nabil O, Masuda K, et al. Antimicrobial Activity Enhancers: Towards Smart Delivery of Antimicrobial Agents. Antibiotics 2022;11:412. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030412.
  2. . Xie Y, Lu H, Li Y, Hu G, Lian S, Liu J, Pang S, Zhu G, Ding X. Unveiling the Mechanisms of Bacterial Resistance and Countermeasures. Patogens 2025;14:1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14111085.
  3. . Oliphant CM, Eroschenko K. Antibiotic Resistance, Part 1: Gram-positive Pathogens. J Nurse Pract 2015;11:70–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.09.018.
  4. . Coronado VG, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Ciprofloxacin Resistance Among Nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococcus aureus in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:71–5. https://doi.org/10.1086/647059.
  5. . Raviglione MC, Boyle JF, Mariuz P, Pablos-Mendez A, Cortes H, Merlo A. Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an acute-care hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34:2050–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.34.11.2050.
  6. . Blumberg HM, Rimland D, Carroll DJ, Terry, P, Wachsmuth IK. Rapid Development of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 1991;163:1279–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/163.6.1279.
  7. . Hershow RC, Khayr WF, Schreckenberger PC. Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: Associated Factors and Resistance to Other Antibiotics. Am J Ther 1998;5:213–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00045391-199807000-00002.
  8. . Zang W, Li D, Gao L, Gao S, Hao P, Bian H. The Antibacterial Potential of Ciprofloxacin Hybrids against Staphylococcusaureus. Curr Top Med Chem 2022;22:1020–34. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026622666220317162132.
  9. . Incidence of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Iraqi patients. IRAQI J Sci 2018;59. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2018.59.3A.10.
  10. . Gupta A, Mumtaz S, Li C-H, Hussain I, Rotello VM. Combatting antibiotic-resistant bacteria using nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48:415–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00748E.
  11. . Dhanda G, Acharya Y, Haldar J. Antibiotic Adjuvants: A Versatile Approach to Combat Antibiotic Resistance. ACS Omega 2023;8:10757–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00312.
  12. . Adeniji OO, Nontongana N, Okoh JC, Okoh AI. The Potential of Antibiotics and Nanomaterial Combinations as Therapeutic Strategies in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Infections: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:15038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315038.
  13. . Wu S, Yu T, Zhou R, Liang Y, Li Y, Yang J, et al. Adjuvant- like biomimetic nanovesicles combat New Delhi metallo-β- lactamases (NDMs) producing superbugs infections. Nano Today 2021;38:101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101185.
  14. . Lin L, Liu X, Zhao M. Screening of xanthine oxidase inhibitor from selected edible plants and hypouricemic effect of Rhizoma Alpiniae Officinarum extract on hyperuricemic rats. J Funct Foods 2018;50:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.09.024.
  15. . Chen Y, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhou S, Deng Q, Wang S. Enhancement of inhibition rate of antibiotic against bacteria by molecularly imprinted nanoparticles targeting alarmone nucleotides as antibiotic adjuvants. J Mater Chem B 2022;10:9438–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB00641C.
  16. . Khurana C, Vala AK, Andhariya N, Pandey OP, Chudasama B. Influence of antibiotic adsorption on biocidal activities of silver nanoparticles. IET Nanobiotechnol 2016;10:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0005.
  17. . Chatzimentor I, Tsamesidis I, Ioannou M-E, Pouroutzidou GK, Beketova A, Giourieva V, et al. Study of Biological Behavior and Antimicrobial Properties of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2023;15:2509. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15102509.
  18. . Bellio P, Luzi C, Mancini A, Cracchiolo S, Passacantando M, Di Pietro L, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles as potential antibiotic adjuvant. Effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on bacterial outer membrane permeability. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA – Biomembr 2018;1860:2428–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.07.002.
  19. . Pop OL, Mesaros A, Vodnar DC, Suharoschi R, Tăbăran F, Magerușan L, et al. Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Efficient Antibacterial Application In Vitro against Gram- Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens. Nanomaterials 2020;10:1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081614.
  20. . Şen Karaman D, Kietz C, Govardhanam P, Slita A, Manea A, Pamukçu A, et al. Core@shell structured ceria@mesoporous silica nanoantibiotics restrain bacterial growth in vitro and in vivo. Biomater Adv 2022;133:112607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112607.
  21. . Mazur P, Skiba-Kurek I, Mrowiec P, Karczewska E, Drożdż R. Synergistic ROS-Associated Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles and Gentamicin Against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int J Nanomedicine 2020;Volume 15:3551–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S246484.
  22. . Doern CD. When Does 2 Plus 2 Equal 5? A Review of Antimicrobial Synergy Testing. J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:4124–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01121-14.
  23. . Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1980;9:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1980.tb05599.x.
  24. . Abdelghafar A, Yousef N, Askoura M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles reduce biofilm formation, synergize antibiotics action and attenuate Staphylococcus aureus virulence in host; an important message to clinicians. BMC Microbiol 2022;22:244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02658-z.
  25. . Serebryakova EV, Darmov IV, Medvedev NP, Alekseev SM, Rybak SI. Evaluation of the Hydrophobicity of Bacterial Cells by Measuring Their Adherence to Chloroform Drops. Microbiology 2002;71:202–4. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015154406214.
  26. . Maikranz E, Spengler C, Thewes N, Thewes A, Nolle F, Jung P, et al. Different binding mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus to hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Nanoscale 2020;12:19267–75. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR03134H.
  27. . Zahari NZ, Tuah PM, Ali SAM, Sabullah MK. Microbial Growth Rate and Distribution of Doubling Time at Different Concentration of Oil Sludge Medium. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2022;1022:012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/1022/1/012075.
  28. . Chamberlin J, Story S, Ranjan N, Chesser G, Arya DP. Gram- negative synergy and mechanism of action of alkynyl bisbenzimidazoles. Sci Rep 2019;9:14171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48898-4.
  29. . Lamikanra A, Allwood MC. Effects of Polyethoxyalkyl Phenols on the Leakage of Intracellular Material from Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Bacteriol 1977;42:379–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00705.x.
  30. . Renuka NK. Structural characteristics of quantum-size ceria nano particles synthesized via simple ammonia precipitation. J Alloys Compd 2012;513:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.027.
  31. . Kumar S, Kumar N, Bhanjana G, Thakur R, Dilbaghi N, Tripathi SK, et al. Enhanced Antimicrobial Activity Of Antibiotics Mixed With Metal Nanoparticles, Chandigarh (India): 2011, p. 203–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3653680.
  32. . Zafar N, Uzair B, Niazi MBK, Menaa F, Samin G, Khan BA, et al. Green Synthesis of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Cerium Oxide/Chitosan Nanocarrier and its Activity Against MRSA- Induced Mastitis. J Pharm Sci 2021;110:3471–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2021.06.017.
  33. . Masadeh MM, Karasneh GA, Al-Akhras MA, Albiss BA, Aljarah KM, Al-azzam SI, et al. Cerium oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles abolish the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin against gram positive and gram negative biofilm bacteria. Cytotechnology 2015;67:427–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-014-9701-8.
  34. . Dar M, Gul R, Karuppiah P, Al-Dhabi N, Alfadda A. Antibacterial Activity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles against ESKAPE Pathogens. Crystals 2022;12:179. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020179.
  35. . Mannion BA, Weiss J, Elsbach P. Separation of sublethal and lethal effects of the bactericidal/permeability increasing protein on Escherichia coli. J Clin Invest 1990;85:853–60. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114512.
  36. . Kuang Y, He X, Zhang Z, Li Y, Zhang H, Ma Y, et al. Comparison Study on the Antibacterial Activity of Nano- or Bulk-Cerium Oxide. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:4103–8. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.3858.