SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 18

Effects of Pruning on Height and Diameter Growth at Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.) Afforestations

Fıstıkçamı (Pinus pinea L.) Ağaçlandırmalarında Budama Uygulamasının Boy ve Çap Gelişimi Üzerine Etkileri

Erol Kırdar
Halil Barış Özel
Murat Ertekin
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2010-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results showed that pruning applications had a positive effect on the height and diameter growth of stone pine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study which was carried out in the stone pine afforestations in Bartın-Karaçaydere district, the effects of purning applications on height and diameter growth of stone pine trees at the end of the 5th year following the purining were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to results obtained from measurements and determinations, it was determined that there were significant differences between the pruned and control trees in terms of height and diameter at P<0.05 and P<0.01 significance levels respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results showed that pruning applications had a positive effect on the height and diameter growth of stone pine.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fıstıkçamı · Ağaçlandırma · Budama

Abstract

In this study which was carried out in the stone pine afforestations in Bartın-Karaçaydere district, the effects of purning applications on height and diameter growth of stone pine trees at the end of the 5th year following the purining were investigated. According to results obtained from measurements and determinations, it was determined that there were significant differences between the pruned and control trees in terms of height and diameter at P<0.05 and P<0.01 significance levels respectively. At the end of the 18th year, the mean height of control stone pine trees was 8,3 m and pruned trees was 10,5 m respectively. The mean diameter of control stone pine trees was 24,2 cm and pruned trees was 36,3 cm respectively. These results showed that pruning applications had a positive effect on the height and diameter growth of stone pine.

Özet

Bartın-Karaçaydere yöresindeki fıstıkçamı ağaçlandırmalarında yürütülen bu çalışmada, budama

🔖

Cite This Article

Kırdar, E., Özel, H. B., Ertekin, M. (2010). Effects of Pruning on Height and Diameter Growth at Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.) Afforestations. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 18, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/1095418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. o Aşk, M. K. 1987. Yaylak ve Mera Islahı. 283s. Ankara.
  2. o Baltruschat, H. and Schönbeck, F. 1975. Studies on the Influence of Endotrophic Mycorrhiza on the Infection of Tobacco by Thielaviopsis basicola Phytopath. Z., 84: 172 - 188.
  3. o Bethlenfalvay, J. G 1992. Mycorhizae and Crop Productivity. Mycorhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. ASA Special Publication, Number 14, p: 1 - 27.
  4. o Bolan, N.S., Robson A.D. and Barrow N.J. 1987. Effects of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorhizae the Availability of Iron Phosphates to Plants. Plant and Soil, Vol: 99, p: 401 - 410.
  5. o Bolan, N.S. 1991. A Critical Review on the Role Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Uptake of Phosphorus by Plants. Plant and Soil, 134: 189 - 207.
  6. o Bonfante - Fasolo, P. 1984. Anatomy and Morphology of VA Mycorrhizae. pp: 5 - 33 in: VA Mycorrhiza. Ed., C.L.I. Powel and D.J. Bagyaraj. CRC Press. Boca Rafon, Florida.
  7. o Brown, M.F., King, E.J. 1991. Morphology and Histology of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhizae. A. anatomy and Cytology. In: Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research. p: 15 21.
  8. o Brundrett, M. 1991. Mycorrhizas in Naturel Ecosystem. Advanced in Ecological Research, Vol (21): 171 - 313.
  9. o Davis, R.M. 1980. Influence of Glomus fasciculatus on Thielaviopsis basicola Root Rot of Citrus. Plant Dis., 64: 839 - 840.
  10. o Dehne, H.W. and Schönbeck, F. 1979. Unterschungen Zum Einfluss der Endotraphen Mykorrhiza auf Pflanzenkrankheiten. II. Phenolstaffwecsel und Lignifizierung (The Influence of Endotrophic Mycorrhiza on Plant Diseases. II. Phenolmetabolism and Lignification) Phytopath. Z., 95: 210 - 216.
  11. o Dehne, H.W., Schönbeck, F., Baltruschat, H. 1978. Untersuchungen zum Einfluss der Endotrophen Mycorrhiza auf Pflanzenkrankheiten. 3. Chitinase Aktivitat und Ornithin Zyklus (The influence Endotrophic Mycorrhiza on Plant Disease. 3. Chitinase - Activity and Ornithinecycle) Z. Pflkrankh. 85: 666 - 678.
  12. o Dehne, H.W. 1982. Interactions Between Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Pathogens. Phytopathology, (72): 1115 - 1119.
  13. o Demir, S. 1998. Bazı Kültür Bitkilerinde Vesiküler-Arbusküler Mikorrhiza (VAM) Oluşumu ve Bunun Bitki Gelişimi ve Dayanıklılıktaki Rolü Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Ege Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Bitki koruma Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, 114 s. İzmir
  14. o Demir, S. ve Onoğur, E. 1999. Bitkilerde Vesiküler-Arbüsküler Mikoriza Oluşumunun Bitki Besleme ve Bitki Korumadaki Önemi. Anadolu Dergisi, 9(2), 12-32.
  15. o Erkun, V. 1999. Çayır Mera Amenajmanı ve Islahı. TKB TÜGEM. Ankara, s. 131.
  16. o Fitter, A.H., Garbaye, J. 1994. Interactions Between Mycorrhizal Fungi and Other Soil Organism. Plant and Soil, Vol: 159, No: 1, p: 123 - 133.
  17. o Frank, A.B. 1885. Über die auf Wurzelsymbiose Beruhende Ernährung Gewisser Baume Durch Unterirdische Pilze. Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft 3, 128-145. (In German)
  18. o Gerdemann, J.W. 1968. Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorhiza and Plant Growth. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 6: 397 - 418.
  19. o Gerdemann, J.W. and Trappe, J.M. 1974. The Endogenaceae in the Pasific North West. Mycol. Mem.,5
  20. o Graham, J.H. and Menge, J.A. 1982. Influence of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and Soil Phosphorus on Take - all Disease of Wheat. Phytopathology 72: 95 - 98.
  21. o Harley, J.L. 1975. The Mycorhizal Associations. Encylopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol:17, p: 148 – 186
  22. o Hayman, D. 1981. Mycorhiza and it’s Significance in Horticulture. The Plantsman, Vol: 2, part: 4, p: 214 - 224.
  23. o Hayman, D. 1982. Influence of Soils and Fertility on Activity and Survial Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. Phytopathology, (72): 1119 - 1126.
  24. o Hayman, D., Mosse, B. 1972. Plant Growth to Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. III Increased Uptake of Labille P from Soil. New Phytol, 71: 41 - 47.
  25. o Jasper, D.A., Robson, A.D., Abott, L.K. 1979. Phosphorus and the Formation of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhizas. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 11: 501 - 505.
  26. o Kapulnik, Y. and Douds, D. D. Jr (eds.) 2000a. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.p: 47-68.
  27. o Kapulnik, Y. and Douds, D. D. Jr (eds.) 2000b. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.p: 85-106.
  28. o Kapulnik, Y. and Douds, D. D. Jr (eds.) 2000c. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.p: 3-18.
  29. o Kara Ö. ve Tilki F. 2001. Mikoriza ve Ormancılıkta Kullanımı. İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri: B, Cilt: 51, Sayı:. 1. pp. 127-139.
  30. o Tisdall, J. M. and Oades, J. M. 1980. The Effect of Crop Rotation on Aggregation in a red-brown Earth. Aust. J. Soil Res. 18: 423-433.
  31. o Linderman, R.G. 1988. Mycorrhizal Interactions with the Rhizosphere Microflora: The Mycorrhizosphere Effect. Phytopathology Vol: 78, No: 3 p: 366 - 370.
  32. o Linderman, R.G. 1994. Role of VAM Fungi in Biocontrol. Pages 1 - 17 in: Mycorrhizae and Plant Health. Edited by F.L. Pfleger and R.G. Linderman, 344 p., APS Press, St Paul, Minnesota, USA
  33. o Li, X. L., Marschner, H. and George, E. 1991. Extension of the Phosphorus Depletion Zone in VA Mycorrhizal White Clover in a Calcareous Soil. Plant and Soil, Vol:135, p: 41 - 48.
  34. o Marschner, H. 1995. Mycorrhizas. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants (Second Edition), Academic Press. p: 566 - 595.
  35. o Moser, M., and Haselwandter, K. 1975. Ecophysiology of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Encylopedia of Plant Physiology. Vol: 12, p:391 - 421.
  36. o Mosse, B. 1973. Advances in the Study of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 11: 429 - 454.
  37. o Morton, J.B. and Benny, G.L. 1990. Revised Classification of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Zygomycetes): a New Order, Glomales, Two New Suborders, Glominae and Gigasporinae and Two New Families Acaulosporaceae and Gigasporaceae with Emendation of Glomaceae. Mycotaxon, 37: 471 - 284.
  38. o Kara Ö. ve Tilki F. 2001. Mikoriza ve Ormancılıkta Kullanımı. İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri: B, Cilt: 51, Sayı:. 1. pp. 127-139.
  39. o Mosse, B. 1973. Advances in the Study of Vesicular - Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 11: 429 - 454.