SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Studies (Elektronik) / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Cultural conceptualisation and bird imagery in Kutadgu Bilig

Kültürel kavramlaştırma ve Kutadgu Bilig’de kuş tasvirleri

ADNAN RÜŞTÜ KARABEYOĞLU
Asu ERSOY
Pages
621–642
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper examines cultural depictions of birds in Kutadgu Bilig which are discussed in terms of elements of cultural conceptualization

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Figurative language use in different figures of speech such as metaphor, metonymy and simile, in terms of cognitive linguistics, is considered like literal language to be a conceptual phenomenon, a process based on cognition and a way of understanding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Investigations of cultural conceptualization which approaches language in terms of category, schema and cultural models also enables the limits of those comprehensions - which contain relationships between language, culture and cognition - to be determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper examines cultural depictions of birds in Kutadgu Bilig which are discussed in terms of elements of cultural conceptualization
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Figurative language use in different figures of speech such as metaphor, metonymy and simile, in terms of cognitive linguistics, is considered like literal language to be a conceptual phenomenon, a process based on cognition and a way of understanding. Investigations of cultural conceptualization which approaches language in terms of category, schema and cultural models also enables the limits of those comprehensions - which contain relationships between language, culture and cognition - to be determined. This paper examines cultural depictions of birds in Kutadgu Bilig which are discussed in terms of elements of cultural conceptualization

Özet

Dilin çeşitli seviyelerinde karşılaşılan metafor, metonimi, benzetme gibi tasvirî dil kullanımları idrâk dil bilim açısından dilin sıradan kullanımında olduğu gibi kavramsal bir olgu, idrâke dayalı bir işleyiş ve kavrayış şekli olarak kabul edilir. Dile kategori, şema ve kültürel model açısından yaklaşan kültürel kavramlaştırma incelemesi ise dil, kültür ve idrâk ilişkilerini barındıran bu kavrayış şekline yönelik sınırların belirlenmesine imkân tanır. Bu itibarla, çalışmada Kutadgu Bilig’deki kuş tasvirleri kültürel dil biliminin konu ve inceleme yöntemlerinden biri olan kültürel kavramlaştırma unsurları bakımından ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABEYOĞLU, A. R., ERSOY, A. (2012). Cultural conceptualisation and bird imagery in Kutadgu Bilig. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 621–642. https://ajindex.com/articles/109490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. AKARSU Bedia (1998),
  2. Dil-Kültür Bağlantısı, İnkılâp Kitabevi,
  3. İstanbul.
  4. AKSAN Doğan (2006),
  5. Anlambilim, Anlambilim Konuları ve Türkçenin Anlambilimi, Engin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  6. BİLGEGİL Kaya (1989),
  7. Edebiyat Bilgi ve Teorileri, Belâgat, Enderun Kitabevi,
  8. İstanbul.
  9. BLOUNT Ben G. (2009), “Anthropological Linguistics”, (Ed. Gunter Senft ve Jan Ola Östman ve Jef Verschueren), Culture and Language Use, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 29-40.
  10. BOWDLE, B. F. ve GENTNER D. (1999), “Metaphor Comprehension: From Comparison to Categorization”, Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 90-95, http://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/gentner/papers/BowdleGentner99.pdf, (ET: 13.03.2012).
  11. BROWN Penelope (2006), “Cognitive Antrropology”, (Ed. Christine Jourdan ve Kevin Tuite), Language, Culture and Society, Cambridge Unversity Press, New York, 96-114.
  12. CASSON Ronald W. (1983), “Schemata In Cognitive Anthropology”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 12. 429-462
  13. CORCORAN John (2010), "Schema", (Ed. Edward N. Zalta), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/schema/, (ET: 13.03.2012).
  14. CROFT William ve CRUSE D. Alan (2004),
  15. Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge University Press,
  16. Cambridge, New York. D'ANDRADE Roy G. (1987), "A Folk Model of The Mind" (Ed. Dorothi Holland ve Naomi Quinn), Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 112-148.
  17. D'ANDRADE Roy G. (1992), "Schemas and Motivation", (Ed. R.G. D'Andrade ve C. Strauss), Human Motives and Cultural Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 23-44. D'ANDRADE Roy G. (1995a), The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D'ANDRADE Roy G. (1995b), “Moral Models in Anthropology”, Current Anthropology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 399-408.
  18. DARNELL Regna (2006), “Benjamin Lee Whorf and The Boasian Foundations of Contemporary Ethnolinguisitcs”, (Ed. Christine Jourdan ve Kevin Tuite) Language, Culture and Society, Cambridge Unversity Press, New York, 82-95.
  19. DANESI Marcel (2004), A Basic Course in Anthropological Linguistics, Canadian Scholars‟ Press Inc., Toronto. DIRVEN René ve PÖRINGS Ralph (Ed.) (2003), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. DIRVEN René ve WOLF Hans-Georg, ve POLZENHAGEN Frank (2007), “Cognitive Linguistics and Cultural Studies”, (Ed. Dirk Geeraerts ve Hubert Cuyckens), The Ox