SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: Özel Sayı Özel Sayı

Exploring the Non-Linear Impacts of Digital Maturity on Corporate Sustainability: New Evidence from Türkiye

Dijital Olgunluğun Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Üzerindeki Doğrusal Olmayan Etkileri: Türkiye'den Yeni Kanıtlar

Mine Aksoy(YALOVA UNIVERSITY)
Mustafa Kemal Yılmaz(İBN HALDUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Esra Cengiz Tırpan(Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University)
Mehtap Özşahin(Gebze Technical University)
Erman Coşkun(Bahçeşehir University)
Özgür Uysal
Pages
107–131
Publication Date
2025-10-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that digital maturity has a significant inverse U-shaped effect on social performance, an insignificant inverse U-shaped effect on environmental performance, and an insignificant U-shaped effect on corporate governance performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the impact of digital maturity on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Turkish companies listed on Borsa Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis is based on a sample of 49 non-financial firms included in the BIST 100 Index, covering the period of 2016-2022.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that digital maturity has a significant inverse U-shaped effect on social performance, an insignificant inverse U-shaped effect on environmental performance, and an insignificant U-shaped effect on corporate governance performance.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2016-2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dijital Olgunluk · Gelişmekte Olan Pazarlar · ESG Performansı

Abstract

This study explores the impact of digital maturity on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Turkish companies listed on Borsa Istanbul. The analysis is based on a sample of 49 non-financial firms included in the BIST 100 Index, covering the period of 2016-2022. A digital maturity index is constructed using a text mining approach to quantify the frequency of digital-related terms in the firm’s annual reports. Panel data analysis is employed to investigate the relationship between digital maturity and ESG performance. The findings indicate that digital maturity has a significant inverse U-shaped effect on social performance, an insignificant inverse U-shaped effect on environmental performance, and an insignificant U-shaped effect on corporate governance performance. The results suggest that moderate levels of digitalization enhance social performance, whereas excessive digitalization may have an adverse effect.

Özet

Bu çalışma, dijital olgunluğun Borsa İstanbul'da işlem gören Türk şirketlerinin çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim (ÇSY) performansı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Analiz, BIST 100 Endeksi'nde yer alan ve 2016-2022 dönemini kapsayan 49 finansal olmayan firmadan oluşan bir örneklem temel alınarak yapılmıştır. Firmaların yıllık raporlarında dijitalleşme ile ilgili terimlerin sıklığını ölçmek için metin madenciliği yaklaşımı kullanılarak bir dijital olgunluk endeksi oluşturulmuştur. Dijital olgunluk ile ÇSY performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak için panel veri analizi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, dijital olgunluğun sosyal performans üzerinde anlamlı, ters U şeklinde bir etkiye, çevresel performans üzerinde anlamsız bir ters U şeklinde etkiye ve kurumsal yönetişim performansı üzerinde anlamsız bir U şeklinde etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, orta düzeyde dijitalleşmenin sosyal performansı artırdığını, aşırı dijitalleşmenin ise olumsuz etkiye sahip olabileceğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksoy, M., Yılmaz, M. K., Tırpan, E. C., Özşahin, M., Coşkun, E., Uysal, Ö. (2025). Exploring the Non-Linear Impacts of Digital Maturity on Corporate Sustainability: New Evidence from Türkiye. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: Özel Sayı Özel Sayı, 107–131. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1813705

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (87)

  1. Ahmad, M.U. and Murray, J. (2019). Understanding the connect between digitalization, sustainability and performance of an organization. International Journal of Business Excellence, 17(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.096909
  2. Ahmadova, G., Delgado-Márquez, B.L., Pedauga, L.E. and La Leyva-de Hiz, D.I. (2022). Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance. Ecological Economics, 196, 107393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107393
  3. Aksoy, M., Yilmaz, M.K., Tatoglu, E. and Basar, M. (2020). Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124284
  4. Anastasiadou, E., Alkire, L. and R¨ondell, J. (2021). Digitalisation for sustainability: Conceptualization, Implications and Future Research Directions. In P. Ekman, P. Dahlin and C. Keller (Eds.), Management and information technology after digital transformation (pp. 43–52). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111245
  5. Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G. and Sarkis, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
  6. Barbosa, M.W., Salume, P.K., Pinto, M.R. and de Sousa, P.R. (2025). The effects of digital maturity on the sustainable performance of agri-food supply chains in two emerging economies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2024-0144
  7. Beier, G., Matthess, M., Guan, T., Grudzien, D.I.D.O.P., Xue, B., de Lima, E.P. and Chen, L. (2022). Impact of Industry 4.0 on corporate environmental sustainability: Comparing practitioners’ perceptions from China, Brazil and Germany. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.017
  8. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R. and Do, H.X. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels. Economic Modelling, 121, 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106203
  9. Borsa Istanbul. (2025). Sustainability in Borsa Istanbul. Retrieved from https://borsaistanbul.com/en/sayfa/2346/sustainability-in-borsa-istanbul
  10. Broccardo, L., Truant, E. and Dana, L-P. (2023). The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113621
  11. Cardinali, P.G. and De Giovanni, P. (2022). Responsible digitalization through digital technologies and green practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2249
  12. Castro, G.D.R., Fernandez, M.C.G. and Colsa, A.U. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 122204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204
  13. Chen, J., Gao, M., Ma, K. and Song, M. (2020). Different effects of technological progress on China’s carbon emissions based on sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2381
  14. Chen, P. and Hao, Y. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2324
  15. Chen, Y., Zhang, M., Matthews, L. and Guo, H. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental information disclosure in China: The moderating role of top management team's ability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 8456-8470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3930
  16. Chiarini, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3194-3207. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2797
  17. Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S. and Piscitello, L. (2021). Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: emerging trajectories and challenges. Resources Policy, 50, 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289
  18. De Stefano, V.M. (2020). ‘Negotiating the algorithm’: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 41(1), 1-32. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/
  19. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A. and Kalisz, D.E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: a systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 123, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042
  20. Dias, A.M., Carvalho, A.M. and Sampaio, P. (2021). Literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 39(6), 1312-1335. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0247
  21. Eroglu, M., Finger, M. and Koksal, E. (2024). The economics and regulation of digitalization. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032692937
  22. Escarus. (2025). Türkiye’s sustainability reporting standards. Retrieved from https://en.escarus.com/turkiyes-sustainability-reporting-standards/
  23. Esses, D., Csete, M.S. and Nemeth, B. (2021). Sustainability and digital transformation in the Visegrad group of central European countries. Sustainability, 13(11), 5833. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115833
  24. Fang, Q, Yu, N. and Xu, H.L. (2022). Governance effects of digital transformation: From the perspective of accounting quality. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 11, 77-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2023.2148944
  25. Farrokhi, A., Shirazi, F., Hajli, N. and Tajvidi, M. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to detect crisis related to events: Decision making in B2B by artificial intelligence. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.015
  26. Fatimah, Y.A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R. and Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: a case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263
  27. Feroz, A.K., Zo, H. and Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530
  28. Fu, T. and Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: The moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1256052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052
  29. Ghobakhloo, M. and Fathi, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and opportunities for energy sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126427
  30. Gossart, C. (2015). Rebound effects and ICT: A review of the literature. In L. Hilty and B. Aebischer (Eds.), ICT innovations for sustainability (pp. 435-448). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_26
  31. Guo, L. and Xu, L. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13(22), 12844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212844
  32. Gupta, S., Chen, H., Hazen, B.T., Kaur, S., Santibañez-Gonzalez, E.D.S. (2019). Circular economy and big data analytics: a stakeholder perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 144, 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030
  33. Gurbaxani, V. and Dunkle, D. (2019). Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 6. Retrieved from https://merage.uci.edu/
  34. Ha, L.T., Thi, T., Huong, L. and Thanh, T.T. (2022). Is digitalization a driver to enhance environmental performance? An empirical investigation of European countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.002
  35. Haans, R.F., Pieters, C. and He, Z.L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177-1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
  36. Hajishirzi, R., Costa, C.J. and Aparicio, M. (2022). Boosting sustainability through digital transformations domains and resilience. Sustainability, 14(3), 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031822
  37. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251-1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
  38. He, Q.Q., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. and Botella-Carrubi, D. (2023). A matter of motivation: The impact of enterprise digital transformation on green innovation. Review of Managerial Science, 18, 1489-1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00665-6
  39. He, X. and Chen, W. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental, social, and governance performance from a human capital perspective. Sustainability, 16, 4737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114737
  40. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A. and Wiesböck, F. (2020). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. In Strategic information management (pp. 151-173). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286797
  41. Hilali, W.E. and Manouar, A.E. (2020). Sustainability through information systems: How can information systems lead to sustainable business models? International Journal of Business Information Systems, 33(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.105160
  42. Kamble, S.S., Gunaseka, A. and Gawankar, S.A. (2018). Sustainable industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009
  43. Khogali, H.O. and Mekid, S. (2023). The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features. Technology in Society, 73, 102232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102232
  44. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Patel, P.C. and Gebauer, H. (2020). The relationship between digitalization and servitization: the role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 151, 119804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804
  45. Lange, S., Pohl, J. and Santarius, T. (2020). Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecological Economics, 176, 106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
  46. Li, L. (2022). Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007
  47. Li, Y., Dai, J. and Cui, L. (2020). The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777
  48. Li, Z., Xie, B., Chen, X. and Fu, Q. (2024). Corporate digital transformation, governance shifts and executive pay-performance sensitivity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103060
  49. Libert, B., Beck, M. and Wind, Y. (2016). Questions to ask before your next digital transformation. Harvard Business Review, 60(12), 11-13. Retrieved from https://docs.media.bitpipe.com/
  50. Lind, J. T. and Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? – The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
  51. Lozano, M.B. and Martinez Ferrero, J. (2022). Do emerging and developed countries differ in terms of sustainable performance? Analysis of board, ownership and country-level factors. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101688
  52. Lu, Y.Z. Xu, C., Zhu, B.S. and Sun, Y.Q. (2023). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
  53. Lythreatis, S., Singh, S.K. and El-Kassar, A.N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
  54. Magnusson, C.M. and Blume, D. (2022). Digitalisation and corporate governance (OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers No. 26). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/digitalisation-and-corporate-governance_296d219f-en.html
  55. Marjaei, S., Yazdi, F.A. and Chandrashekara, M. (2019). MAXQDA and its application to LIS research. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/maxqda-application-lis-research/docview/2236131089/se-2
  56. Mehedintu, A.I. and Soava, G. (2023). Approach to the impact of digital technologies on sustainability reporting through structural equation modeling and artificial neural networks. Electronics, 12(9), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12092048
  57. Meng, S., Su, H. and Yu, J. (2022). Digital transformation and corporate social performance: How do board independence and institutional ownership matter? Frontiers in Pyscology, 13, 915583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915583
  58. Mettler, T. (2024). The connected workplace: Characteristics and social consequences of work surveillance in the age of datification, sensorization, and artificial intelligence. Journal of Information Technology, 39(3), 547-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231202535
  59. Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R. and Krogstie, J. (2021). Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: the role of organizational inertia. Information and Management, 58(6), 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103412
  60. Na, C., Chen, X., Li, X., Li, Y. and Wang, X. (2022). Digital transformation of value chains and CSR performance. Sustainability, 14(16), 10245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610245
  61. Orlitzky, M., Louche, C., Gond, J. P., and Chapple, W. (2017). Unpacking the drivers of corporate social performance: A multilevel, multistakeholder, and multimethod analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2822-y
  62. Piccarozzi, M., Silvestri, C., Aquilani, B. and Silvestri, L. (2022). Is this a new story of the “Two Giants”? A systematic literature review of the relationship between industry 4.0, sustainability and its pillars. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 177, 121511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121511
  63. Robertsone, G. and Lapina, I. (2023). Digital transformation as a catalyst for sustainability and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100017
  64. Sama, L.M., Stefanidis, A. and Casselman, R.M. (2022). Rethinking corporate governance in the digital economy: The role of stewardship. Business Horizons, 65(5), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.08.001
  65. Scholz, R. W., Bartelsman, E. J., Diefenbach, S., Franke, L., Grunwald, A., Helbing, D., … Viale Pereira, G. (2018). Unintended side effects of the digital transition: European scientists’ messages from a proposition-based expert round table. Sustainability, 10(6), 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062001
  66. Sraml Gonzalez, J. and Gulbrandsen, M. (2022). Innovation in established industries undergoing digital transformation: the role of collective identity and public values. Innovation, 24(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1938578
  67. Su, X., Wang, S. and Li, F. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance based on the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 15, 13506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813506
  68. Sun, Z., Wang, W., Wang, W. and Sun, X. (2024). How does digital transformation affect corporate social responsibility performance? From the dual perspective of internal drive and external governance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1156-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2615
  69. Teichmann, F., Boticiu, S. and Sergi, B.S. (2023). RegTech—Potential benefits and challenges for businesses. Technology in Society, 72, 102150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102150 UNFCC. (2023). Republic of Türkiye updated first nationally determined contribution. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2023-04/T%C3%9CRK%C4%B0YE_UPDATED%201st%20NDC_EN.pdf
  70. Van Veldhoven, Z. and Vanthienen, J. (2022). Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic Markets, 32, 629-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00464-5
  71. Waibel, M.W., Steenkamp, M.W., Moloko, L.P. and Oosthuizen, G.A. (2017). Investigating the effects of smart production systems on sustainability elements. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.094
  72. Wang, C.X., Wang, D.L., Deng, X.C. and Wang, S. (2023). Research on the impact of enterprise digital transformation on internal control. Sustainability, 15(10), 8392. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108392
  73. Wang, J., Hong, Z. and Long, H. (2023). Digital transformation empowers ESG performance in the manufacturing industry: From ESG to DESG. Sage Open, 13(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231204158
  74. Warner, K.S. and Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
  75. Wu, M., Kozanoglu, D.C., Min, C. and Zhang, Y. (2021). Unraveling the capabilities that enable digital transformation: a data-driven methodology and the case of artificial intelligence. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, 101368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101368
  76. Wu, W., Fu, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Niu, Y., Li, B. and Huang, G.Q. (2022). Consortium blockchain-enabled smart ESG reporting platform with token-based incentives for corporate crowdsensing. Computers &. Industrial Engineering, 172, 108456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108456
  77. Xu, C., Sun, G. and Kong, T. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on enterprise green innovation. International Review of Economics and Finance, 90, 1.-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.001
  78. Yalina, N. and Rozas, I.S. (2020). Digital workplace: Digital transformation for environmental sustainability. Earth and Environmental Science, 456, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/456/1/012022
  79. Yang, G., Nie, Y., Li, H. and Wang, H. (2023). Digital transformation and low-carbon technology innovation in manufacturing firms: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 263, 108969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108969
  80. Yang, P., Hao, X, Wang, L., Zhang, S. and Yang, L. (2024b). Moving toward sustainable development: The influence of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance. Kybernetes, 53(2), 669-687. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0521
  81. Yang, S., Tai, Y. and Liu, J. (2024a). Mechanism analysis and path study of digital transformation on corporate governance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sustainability, 16, 9245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219245
  82. Yang, X. and Han, Q. (2024). Nonlinear effects of enterprise digital transformation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(2), 355-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0553
  83. Zeng, H., Ran, H., Zhou, Q., Jin, Y. and Cheng, X. (2022). The financial effect of firm digitalization: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 183, 121951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121951
  84. Zhang, C., Chen, P. and Hao, Y. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on corporate sustainability-new evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1047418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1047418
  85. Zhao, Q.Q., Li, X.T. and Li, S.Q. (2023) Analyzing the relationship between digital transformation strategy and ESG performance in large manufacturing enterprises: The mediating role of green innovation. Sustainability, 15, 9998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139998
  86. Zheng, Y. and Zhang, Q. (2023). Digital transformation, corporate social responsibility and green technology innovation- based on empirical evidence of listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 424, 138805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138805
  87. Zhong, Y., Zhao, H. and Yin, T. (2023). Resource bundling: How does enterprise digital transformation affect enterprise ESG development. Sustainability, 15(2), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021319