SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

How Digitalization Shapes Export Potential: Firm-Level Insights From The EU and Beyond

Dijitalleşme İhracat Potansiyelini Nasıl Şekillendiriyor: AB ve Ötesinden Firma Düzeyinde Bulgular

Özlem Fikirli(BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İKTİSAT BÖLÜMÜ, İKTİSAT PR.)0000-0002-4003-7276
Hasan Şahin(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5922-068X
Pages
179–199
Publication Date
2026-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the adoption of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and robotics technologies is positively and statistically significantly associated with the likelihood of exporting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between the adoption of advanced digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), and the probability of exporting, utilizing a probit model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicate that the adoption of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and robotics technologies is positively and statistically significantly associated with the likelihood of exporting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Robotics technologies exhibit a consistentand positive association with export participation across all export regions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapay Zeka · Bulut Bilişim · Robotik

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between the adoption of advanced digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), and the probability of exporting, utilizing a probit model. The results indicate that the adoption of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and robotics technologies is positively and statistically significantly associated with the likelihood of exporting. Big data analytics, smart devices, and blockchain technologies do not show a statistically significant association with firms’ likelihood of exporting. The study investigates the relationship between specific digital technologies and export destinations as a secondary objective by applying a multivariate probit model, which accounts for potential correlations among the error terms across destination-specific export decisions. The findings show that artificial intelligence and smart devices are significantly associated with exports to EU countries. Cloud computingis significantly associated with export activities to all countries except China. Big data analytics is significantly associated with exports to non-EU countries. Incontrast, blockchain technology does not exhibit a statistically significant relationship with export destinations. Robotics technologies exhibit a consistentand positive association with export participation across all export regions.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yapay zeka (YZ) gibi ileri dijital teknolojilerin benimsenmesi ile firmaların ihracat olasılığı arasındaki ilişkiyi probit modeli kullanarak incelemektir. Elde edilen bulgular, yapay zeka, bulut bilişim ve robotik teknolojilerinin benimsenmesinin ihracat yapma olasılığıyla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Büyük veri analitiği, akıllı cihazlar ve blokzinciri teknolojileri ise firmaların ihracat yapma olasılığıyla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki göstermemektedir. Çalışma, ikincil bir amaç olarak, belirli dijital teknolojilerin ihracat yapılan bölgelerle ilişkisini çok değişkenli probit modeli kullanarak analiz etmektedir. Bu yöntem, bölgeye özgü ihracat kararlarında hata terimleri arasındaki olası korelasyonları dikkate almaktadır. Bulgular, yapay zekâ ve akıllı cihazların AB ülkelerine yapılan ihracatla anlamlı biçimde ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulut bilişim Çin hariç tüm ülkelere ihracat faaliyetleriyle istatistiksel olarak anlamlı biçimde ilişkilidir. Büyük veri analitiği, AB dışındaki ülkelere yönelik ihracatla anlamlı bir ilişki göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, blokzincir teknolojisinin ihracat bölgeleriyle istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkisi bulunmamaktadır. Robotik teknolojiler ise tüm ihracat bölgelerinde ihracat katılımıyla tutarlı ve pozitif bir ilişki sergilemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Fikirli, Ö., Şahin, H. (2026). How Digitalization Shapes Export Potential: Firm-Level Insights From The EU and Beyond. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1814381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (92)

  1. Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716
  2. Alguacil Marí, M.T., Lo Turco, A. and Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2020). What is so special about robots and trade? (Cege Discussion Papers No. 410). Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756787
  3. Amadu, A.W. and Danquah, M. (2019). R&D, human capital and export behavior of manufacturing and service firms in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 20(3), 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1581003
  4. Aw, B.Y., Roberts, M.J. and Xu, D.Y. (2008). R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity. American Economic Review, 98(2), 451-56. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.451
  5. Balci, G. and Surucu Balci, E. (2021). Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 156, 102539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102539
  6. Ballestar, M.T., Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz, J. and Torrent-Sellens, J. (2020). Knowledge, robots and productivity in SMEs: Explaining the second digital wave. Journal of Business Research, 108, 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.017
  7. Baruffaldi, S., van Beuzekom, B., Dernis, H., Harhoff, D., Rao, N., Rosenfeld, D. and Squicciarini, M. (2020). Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: Making the impossible possible (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 2020/05). https://doi.org/10.1787/5f65ff7e-en.
  8. Bekkers, E., Koopman, B. and Teh, R. (2018). Long run trends in international trade. The impact of new technologies. Paper presented at the GTAP Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Cartagena, Colombia. Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332962/
  9. Belu, M.G. (2019). Application of blockchain in international trade: An overview. Romanian Economic Journal, 22(71), 2-15. Retrieved from http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/ Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B., Redding, S.J. and Schott, P.K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.3.105
  10. Chen, H., Chiang, R.H. and Storey, V.C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503
  11. Cheng, C., Zhong, H. and Cao, L. (2020). Facilitating speed of internationalization: The roles of business intelligence and organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 110, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.003
  12. Chevassus-Lozza, E., Gaigné, C. and Le Mener, L. (2013). Does input trade liberalization boost downstream firms' exports? Theory and firm-level evidence. Journal of International Economics, 90(2), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.02.004
  13. Ciuriak, D. and Ptashkina, M. (2018). The digital transformation and the transformation of international trade (ZBW Issue Paper). Retrieved from https://savearchive.zbw.eu/bitstream/11159/1651/1/the-digital-transformation-and-trade-ciuriak-and-ptashkina.pdf
  14. Ciuriak, D., Lapham, B., Wolfe, R., Collins‐Williams, T. and Curtis, J. (2015). Firms in international trade: trade policy implications of the new new trade theory. Global Policy, 6(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12183
  15. Clerides, S.K., Lach, S. and Tybout, J.R. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903-947. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555784
  16. Compagnucci, F., Gentili, A., Valentini, E. and Gallegati, M. (2019). Robotization and labour dislocation in the manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: A panel VAR approach. Applied Economics, 51(57), 6127-6138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1659499
  17. Conway, J. (2016). The industrial internet of things: An evolution to a smart manufacturing enterprise. Retrieved from https://www.mhi.org/media/members/15373/131111777451441650.pdf
  18. Dalenogare, L.S., Benitez, G.B., Ayala, N.F. and Frank, A.G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
  19. Damijan, J.P., Polanec, S. and Prašnikar, J. (2004). Self-selection, export market heterogeneity and productivity improvements: Firm level evidence from Slovenia (LICOS Discussion paper No. 148). Retrieved from https://feb.kuleuven.be/drc/licos/publications/dp/dp148.pdf
  20. De Caria, R. (2017). A digital revolution in international trade? The international legal framework for blockchain technologies, virtual currencies and smart contracts: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Congress of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on International Trade Law. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/36152811/17_06783_ebook.pdf#page=114
  21. Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A. and Magnani, G. (2021). Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120650
  22. Desdemoustier, J., Crutzen, N. and Giffinger, R. (2019). Municipalities' understanding of the smart city concept: An exploratory analysis in Belgium. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.029
  23. DeStefano, T. and Timmis, J. (2021). Robots and export quality (World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper No. 9678). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/35639
  24. DeStefano, T., Kneller, R. and Timmis, J. (2020). Cloud computing and firm growth (CESifo Working Paper No. 8306). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3618829
  25. Dethine, B., Enjolras, M. and Monticolo, D. (2020). Digitalization and SMEs’ export management: Impacts on resources and capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4), 18-34. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1344
  26. Ethier, W.J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 389-405. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831539
  27. Etro, F. (2010). The economic consequences of the diffusion of cloud computing. In S. Dutta and I. Mia (Eds.), The global information technology report 2009-2010, ICT for sustainability (pp. 107-112). World Economic Forum and INSEAD.
  28. European Commission. (2020). Flash Eurobarometer 486 SMEs, start-ups, scale-ups and entrepreneurship [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13639
  29. European Investment Bank. (2021). Digitalisation in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.eib.org/attachments/efs/digitalisation_in_europe_2020_2021_en.pdf
  30. European Parliament. (2022). Biodiversity, land use and forestry. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_2.4.3.pdf
  31. Federici, D., Parisi, V. and Ferrante, F. (2020). Heterogeneous firms, corporate taxes and export behavior: A firm-level investigation for Italy. Economic Modelling, 88, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.012
  32. Ferraris, A., Mazzoleni, A., Devalle, A. and Couturier, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and knowledge management: Impact on firm performance. Management Decision, 57(8), 1923-1936. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0825
  33. Fonseca, T., de Faria, P. and Lima, F. (2019). Human capital and innovation: The importance of the optimal organizational task structure. Research Policy, 48(3), 616-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.010
  34. Fu, X.M., Bao, Q., Xie, H. and Fu, X. (2021). Diffusion of industrial robotics and inclusive growth: Labour market evidence from cross country data. Journal of Business Research, 122, 670-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.051
  35. Gajewski, P. and Tchorek, G. (2017). What drives export performance of firms in Eastern and Western Poland? European Planning Studies, 25(12), 2250-2271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1355890
  36. Georgakopoulos, D. and Jayaraman, P.P. (2016). Internet of things: From internet scale sensing to smart services. Computing, 98(10), 1041-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-016-0510-0
  37. Ghasemaghaei, M. and Calic, G. (2020). Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data. Journal of Business Research, 108, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.062
  38. Giczy, A.V., Pairolero, N.A. and Toole, A.A. (2022). Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) invention: A novel AI patent dataset. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 476-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09900-2
  39. Girma, S., Greenaway, A. and Kneller, R. (2004). Does exporting increase productivity? A microeconometric analysis of matched firms. Review of International Economics, 12(5), 855-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00486.x
  40. Goldfarb, A. and Trefler, D. (2018). AI and international trade (NBER Working Paper No. w24254). https://doi.org/10.3386/w24254
  41. Gourlay, A. and Seaton, J. (2004). Explaining the decision to export: evidence from UK firms. Applied Economics Letters, 11(3), 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485042000203760
  42. Graetz, G. and Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753-768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00754
  43. Gupta, S., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A. and Al-Khowaiter, W.A. (2018). Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.005
  44. Harris, R., Moffat, J. (2011). R&D, innovation and exporting (Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC) Discussion Papers No. SERCDP0073). Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/33593
  45. Helpman, E. (1981). International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. Journal of International Economics, 11(3), 305-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(81)90001-5
  46. Helpman, E. and Krugman, P.R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  47. Hiep, N. and Ohta, H. (2007). Entry Costs and heterogeneous characteristics of firms in the decision to export: Empirical evidence from firm-level data in Vietnam (GSICS Working Paper Series No. 17). Retrieved from https://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/gwps/2007-17.pdf
  48. Huang, X., Liu, X. and Görg, H. (2017). Heterogeneous firms, financial constraints and export behaviour: A firm‐level investigation for China. The World Economy, 40(11), 2328-2353. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12540
  49. IFR. (2020). World robotics report 2020. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/record-2.7-million-robots-work-in-factories-around-the-globe
  50. Johansson, S. (2009). Market experiences and export decisions in heterogeneous firms (CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 196). Retrieved from https://static.sys.kth.se/itm/wp/cesis/cesiswp196.pdf
  51. Jungmittag, A. (2021). Robotisation of the manufacturing industries in the EU: Convergence or divergence? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(5), 1269-1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09819-0
  52. Jungmittag, A. and Pesole, A. (2019). The impact of robots on labour productivity: A panel data approach covering 9 industries and 12 countries (JRC Working papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology No. 2019/08). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/231332/1/jrc-wplet201908.pdf
  53. Kabalci, Y. (2016). A survey on smart metering and smart grid communication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.114
  54. Kimani, D., Adams, K., Attah-Boakye, R., Ullah, S., Frecknall-Hughes, J. and Kim, J. (2020). Blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: Whence, whither, wherefore and how? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120254
  55. Kromann, L., Malchow-Møller, N., Skaksen, J.R. and Sørensen, A. (2020). Automation and productivity—a cross-country, cross-industry comparison. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(2), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz039
  56. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805774
  57. Kshetri, N. (2011). Cloud Computing in the Global South: Drivers, effects and policy measures. Third World Quarterly, 32(6), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.586225
  58. Kshetri, N. (2019). Blockchains and international business. IT Professional, 21(4), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2909700
  59. Lejpras, A. (2019). Determinants of export performance: Differences between service and manufacturing SMEs. Service Business, 13(1), 171-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-018-0376-7
  60. Leloup, L. (2017). Blockchain: La revolution de la confiance. Paris: Editions Eyrolles.
  61. Love, J.H., Roper, S. and Zhou, Y. (2016). Experience, age and exporting performance in UK SMEs. International Business Review, 25(4), 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.10.001
  62. Lu, Y., Xu, X. and Wang, L. (2020). Smart manufacturing process and system automation–a critical review of the standards and envisioned scenarios. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56, 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.010
  63. McDaniel, C.A. and Norberg, H.C. (2019). Can blockchain technology facilitate international trade? (Mercatus Research Paper). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3377708
  64. Melitz, M.J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
  65. Meltzer, J.P. (2016). Maximizing the opportunities of the internet for international trade (ICTSD Policy Options Paper). Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/E15/WEF_Digital_Trade_report_2015_1401.pdf
  66. Mendling, J., Baesens, B., Bernstein, A. and Fellmann, M. (2017). Challenges of smart business process management: An introduction to the special issue. Decision Support Systems, 100, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.06.009
  67. Morbey, G.K. and Reithner, R.M. (1990). How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research-Technology Management, 33(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1990.11670656
  68. Müller, O. Fay, M. and Vom Brocke, J. (2018). The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), 488-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955
  69. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review 21260. Retrieved from https://assets.pubpub.org/d8wct41f/31611263538139.pdf
  70. Nicholas-Donald, A., Mahmood, M.A. and Trevino, L.L. (2018). Does adoption of cloud computing matter? The economic worth of cloud computing implementation. International Journal of Information Systems and Management, 1(4), 328-342. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISAM.2018.094756
  71. Niebel, T., Rasel, F. and Viete, S. (2019). BIG data–BIG gains? Understanding the link between big data analytics and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(3), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1493075
  72. OECD. (2015). OECD digital economy outlook 2015. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/digital/oecd-digital-economy-outlook-2015-9789264232440-en.htm.
  73. Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D. and Fernández, G.P. (2021). Artificial intelligence and industrial innovation: Evidence from firm-level data (ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 21-036). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829822
  74. Ranjan, P. and Raychaudhuri, J. (2016). The “new-new” trade theory: A review of the literature. In M. Roy and S.S. Roy (Eds.), International trade and international finance explorations of contemporary issues (pp. 3-21). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2797-7
  75. Ricci, L.A. and Trionfetti, F. (2012). Productivity, networks, and export performance: Evidence from a cross‐country firm dataset. Review of International Economics, 20(3), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2012.01038.x
  76. Rodríguez, J.L. and Orellana, B.S. (2020) Human capital and export performance in the Spanish manufacturing firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(1), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2019-0143
  77. Rodríguez-Pose, A., Tselios, V., Winkler, D. and Farole, T. (2013). Geography and the determinants of firm exports in Indonesia. World Development, 44, 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.12.002
  78. Schniederjans, D.G. and Hales, D.N. (2016). Cloud computing and its impact on economic and environmental performance: A transaction cost economics perspective. Decision Support Systems, 86, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.03.009
  79. Son, I., Lee, D., Lee, J.N. and Chang, Y.B. (2011). Understanding the impact of IT service innovation on firm performance: The case of cloud computing. Paper presented at the PACIS 2011. Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1179&context=pacis2011
  80. Srinivasan, T.N. and Archana, V. (2011). Determinants of export decision of firms. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(7), 49-58. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/
  81. Sterlacchini, A. (2001). The determinants of export performance: A firm-level study of Italian manufacturing. Review of World Economics, 137(3), 450-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707626
  82. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  83. Tapscott, D. and Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
  84. Teruel, M., Coad, A., Domnick, C., Flachenecker, F., Harasztosi, P., Janiri, M.L. and Pal, R. (2022). The birth of new HGEs: Internationalization through new digital technologies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(3), 804-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09875-0
  85. Tomiura, E. (2007). Effects of R&D and networking on the export decision of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 36(5), 758-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.020
  86. van Ark, B. (2016). The productivity paradox of the new digital economy. International Productivity Monitor, 31, 3-18. Retrieved from https://research.rug.nl/
  87. Von Krogh, G. (2018). Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(4), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0084
  88. Wang, J. (2020). Big data on the influence of SMEs in export trade financing costs. In J. Maclntyre, J. Zhao and X. Ma (Eds.), 2020 international conference on machine learning and big data analytics for IOT security and privacy (pp. 345-351). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62743-0_50
  89. Xu, D., Guo, Y. and Huang, M. (2021). Can Artificial intelligence improve firms’ competitiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(10), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1899911
  90. Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H. and Sheu, C. (2020). The value of blockchain technology implementation in international trades under demand volatility risk. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2163-2183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1693651
  91. Zhang, J., van Gorp, D. and Kievit, H. (2022). Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 1077-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09934-0
  92. Zhong, R.Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E. and Newman, S.T. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review. Engineering, 3(5), 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015