Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Buckling restrained braces

Burkulması engellenmiş çelik çaprazlar

Pages
160–170
Publication Date
2016-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the component and subassembly test of the BRBs and then BRB frame tests available in the literature are summarized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) have high energy dissipation capacity and equal tension and compression axial load capacity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first studies on BRBs started in Japan in 1970 and since then more studies have been undertaken in other earthquake prone countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the component and subassembly test of the BRBs and then BRB frame tests available in the literature are summarized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Burkulması engellenmiş çelik çapraz · Enerji sönümleyici · Çelik yapılar

Abstract

Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) have high energy dissipation capacity and equal tension and compression axial load capacity. Therefore, the application of BRBs has gained popularity in seismic regions. The first studies on BRBs started in Japan in 1970 and since then more studies have been undertaken in other earthquake prone countries. Although the BRBs perform well in component and subassembly tests, they do not perform as well in frame tests because of the interaction between beam-column-gusset plate and BRB. In this study, the component and subassembly test of the BRBs and then BRB frame tests available in the literature are summarized.

Özet

Burkulması engellenmiş çelik çaprazların (BEÇÇ’lerin) eksenel basınç ve çekme kapasiteleri eşit olmasının yanında BEÇÇ’ler yüksek enerji sönümleme özelliğine de sahiptirler. Bu bakımdan deprem bölgelerinde kullanılmaları giderek artmaktadır. BEÇÇ’lerin geliştirilmesine ait çalışmalar ilk olarak 1970’li yıllarda Japonya’da başlamıştır ve daha sonra özellikle deprem bölgesi üzerindeki ülkelerde devam etmiştir. BEÇÇ’lerin eleman ve çerçeve benzeri sistem bazındaki performanslarının oldukça kararlı olmasına karşın, çerçeve sistemi içerisindeki davranışlarında kiriş, kolon, bayrak levhası ve BEÇÇ arasında meydana gelen etkileşimden dolayı istenmeyen sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, BEÇÇ’lerin ilk olarak eleman ve çerçeve benzeri sistem bazında ve daha sonra çerçeve içerisinde yapılan deneysel çalışmaları özetlemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, R. (2016). Buckling restrained braces. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 160–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/108890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Black GR, Wenger BA, Popov EP. “Inelastic Buckling of Steel Struts Under Cyclic Load Reversals”. University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. Technical Report, UCB/EERC-80/40, 1980.
  2. Black CJ, Makris N, Aike, ID. “Component Testing, Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling Restrained Braces”. University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. Technical Report, PEER 2002/08, 2002. López WA. “Design of Unbonded Braced Frames”. 70th Annual Convention, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California, USA, 2001.
  3. Wada A, Saeki E, Takeuchi T, Watanabe AC. “Development of Unbonded Brace, Nippon Steel's Unbonded Braces”. Nippon Steel Corporation Building Construction and Urban Development Division, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1-16, 1998.
  4. Uang CM, Nakashima M. Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames. Editors: Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV. Earthquake Engineering Performance-Based Engineering. Boca Raton, Florida, USA, CRC Press, 2004.
  5. Seismology to Qiang X. “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in asia”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(6), 727- 748, 2005.
  6. Uang CM, Nakashima M, Tsai KC. “Research and application of buckling restrained brace frames”. Steel Structures, 4, 301-313, 2004.
  7. Tsai KC, Lai JWYC, Lin SL, Weng, CH. “Research and application of double-core buckling restrained braces in Taiwan”. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 1-6 August 2004. National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering. “The Earthquake Engineering Online Archive | Nisee e- library”. CR0310 (02.03.2015).
  8. Watanabe A, Hitomi Y, Yaeki E, Wada A, Fujimoto M. “Properties of brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube”. 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Kyoto-Tokyo, Japan, 2-9 August 1988.
  9. Iwata M, Kato T, Wada A. Buckling-Restrained Braces as Hysteretic Dampers. Editors: Mazzolani FM, Tremblay R. STESSA 2000: Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas: Proceedings of the Third International Conference STESSA (21-24 August), Montreal, Canada, 33–38, 2000.
  10. Clark P, Aiken I, Kasai K, Ko E, Kimura I. “Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices”. 69th Annual Convention of Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California, USA, 1999.
  11. Chen CC, Chen SY, Liaw JJ. “Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28