SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

Environmental fate of nanoparticles and their impacts on anaerobic digestion process

Nanopartiküllerin çevresel akıbetleri ve anaerobik parçalanma prosesine etkileri

Elçin Kökdemir Ünşar
N. Altınay Perendeci
Pages
503–512
Publication Date
2016-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The advantages of anaerobic digestion process which is used effectively for energy producing from sludge biomass is explained and researches with a focus on the impacts of nanoparticles, which involve in anaerobic digestion due to their environmental pathway, on anaerobic digestion process have been reviewed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Compared to larger sized particles, nanoparticles have very different electrochemical, catalytic, optical, physical and chemical properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of these different properties, nanoparticles are widely used in industry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The advantages of anaerobic digestion process which is used effectively for energy producing from sludge biomass is explained and researches with a focus on the impacts of nanoparticles, which involve in anaerobic digestion due to their environmental pathway, on anaerobic digestion process have been reviewed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anaerobik parçalanma · İnhibisyon · Metan potansiyeli

Abstract

Compared to larger sized particles, nanoparticles have very different electrochemical, catalytic, optical, physical and chemical properties. Because of these different properties, nanoparticles are widely used in industry. By the contact of water from dishwashing, shower, rain, etc., nanoparticle containing products release nanoparticles and waste water carries them to waste water treatment plants. In this study, information about industrial use and potential toxic effects of nanoparticles were given. The advantages of anaerobic digestion process which is used effectively for energy producing from sludge biomass is explained and researches with a focus on the impacts of nanoparticles, which involve in anaerobic digestion due to their environmental pathway, on anaerobic digestion process have been reviewed.

Özet

boyutlu partiküllerine göre elektrokimyasal, katalitik ve optik özellikler olmak üzere çok daha farklı fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikler göstermektedirler. Bu farklılaşmalardan dolayı endüstride kendilerine kolayca kullanım alanı bulmaktadırlar. Duş, bulaşık, çamaşır ve yağmur sularının nanopartikül içeren ürünlere teması ile suya karışan nanopartiküller, suyun izlediği yolu izlemekte ve bu şekilde nanopartiküller atıksu arıtma tesisine ulaşmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada nanopartiküllerin endüstriyel kullanımları ve potansiyel toksik etkileri hakkında bilgi verilmiş, biyokütleden enerji üretiminde etkin bir şekilde kullanılan anaerobik parçalama prosesinin avantajlarına değinilmiş ve çevresel akıbetleri sonucunda atıksu arıtma tesislerinde anaerobik prosese dahil olan nanopartiküllerin bu prosesi nasıl etkilediğini araştıran çalışmalar incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünşar, E. K., Perendeci, N. A. (2016). Environmental fate of nanoparticles and their impacts on anaerobic digestion process. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 503–512. https://ajindex.com/articles/108888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kökdemir Ünşar E. Nanopartiküllerin Evsel Arıtma Çamurlarının Anaerobik Parçalanabilirliği Üzerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi,
  2. Antalya, Türkiye, 2013.
  3. Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL. “Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation”. Toxicol Sciences, 77(1), 126-134, 2004.
  4. Handy RD, Shaw BJ. “Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology”. Health Risk Society, 9(2), 125-144, 2007.
  5. Handy RD, Von Der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M. “The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles”. Ecotoxicology, 17(4), 287-314, 2008.
  6. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendre S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR. “Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability and effects”. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 27(9), 1825-1851, 2008.
  7. Barrena R, Casals E, Colon J, Font X, Sanchez A. Puntes V. “Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of model nanoparticles”. Chemosphere, 75(7), 850-857, 2009. Khanna V. Environmental and Risk Assessment at Multiple Scales with Application to Emerging Nanotechnologies, PhD. Dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio, USA, 2009.
  8. Savolainen K, Alenius H, Norppa H, Pylkkanen L, Tuomi T, Kasper G. “Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials and nanotechnologies-a review”. Toxicology, 269(2-3), 92-104, 2010.
  9. Tae Kim K, Klaine SJ, Cho J, Kim SH, Kim SD. “Oxidative stres responses of Daphnia magna exposed to TiO2 nanoparticles according to size fraction”. Science of the Total Environment, 408(10), 2268-2272, 2010.
  10. Kahru A, Dubourguier HC. “From ecotoxicology to nanotoxicology”. Toxicology, 269(2-3), 105-119. 2010.
  11. Peralta-Videa J, Zhao L, Lopez-Moreno ML, De La Rosa G, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL. “Nanomaterials and the Environment: A review for the biennium 2008-2010”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 186(1), 1-15, 2011.
  12. Erkoç Ş. Nanobilim ve Nanoteknoloji, ODTÜ Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye, 2011.
  13. Nortwestern University. “Discovernano 2005”. http://discovernano.org/whatis/index_html/howsmall_html.html (10.09.2015).
  14. Hester RE, Harrison RM. Nanotechnology: Consequences for Human Health and the Environment. USA, RSC Publishing, 2007.
  15. Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. “Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity”. Biointerphases, 2(4), 17-71, 2007.
  16. Yanamala N, Kagan VE, Shvedona AA. “