Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Electricity Theft Problem and Effects of Privatization Policies on Distribution Losses of Turkey

Pages
163–176
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By considering that the privatization process was completed at the end of 2013, the scope and conclusions of this study can be developed further by obtaining the data for the future decade for more definite analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last decade, the increasing of electric energy demand in Turkey has realized as 5.5% annually.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This rapid increase in demand obliges the country to make energy investments continuously and ensure security of energy sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By considering that the privatization process was completed at the end of 2013, the scope and conclusions of this study can be developed further by obtaining the data for the future decade for more definite analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Electricity theft · distribution loss · privatization

Abstract

In the last decade, the increasing of electric energy demand in Turkey has realized as 5.5% annually. This rapid increase in demand obliges the country to make energy investments continuously and ensure security of energy sources. In addition to energy investments, effective use of available resources is one of the most important components of sustainable development policies. In this study, technical and non-technical losses of power transmission and distribution systems and the size of these losses have been analyzed in Turkey. The effects of privatization for distribution services on such losses are presented by comparing them with analysis of statistical data. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the privatization process did not create a positive effect especially on zones using huge amount of illegal electrical energy. However, it has been determined that positive developments have occurred after the privatization at many distribution centers in terms of losses in general and the target values have been obtained. By considering that the privatization process was completed at the end of 2013, the scope and conclusions of this study can be developed further by obtaining the data for the future decade for more definite analysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONAT, N. (2018). Electricity Theft Problem and Effects of Privatization Policies on Distribution Losses of Turkey. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 163–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/108802

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ulusoy, A, Oguz, F, The privatization of electricity distribution in Turkey: A legal and economic analysis, Energy Policy, 2007, 35, 5021–5034
  2. Erdogdu, E, Some thoughts on the Turkish electricity distribution industry, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13, 1485–1494
  3. Çetinkaya, M, Başaran A.A, Bağdadioğlu, N, Electricity reform, tariff and household elasticity in Turkey, Utilities Policy, 2015, 37, 79 - 85
  4. Colak, İ, Bayindir, Fulli, G, Tekin, İ, Demirtaş, K, Covrig, C.F, Smart grid opportunities and applications in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 33, 344–352
  5. Özbuğday, F.C, Öğünlü, B, Alma, H, The sustainability of Turkish electricity distributors and last-resort electricity suppliers: What did transition from vertically integrated public monopoly to regulated competition with privatized and unbundled firms bring about?, Utilities Policy, 2016, 39, 50 - 67
  6. Şirin, S.M, A panel data analysis on the costs of Turkish electricity distribution companies, Energy Strategy Reviews, 2017, 18, 250 - 259
  7. Jimenez, R, Serebrisky, T, Mercado, J, Power lost sizing electricity losses in transmission and distribution systems in Latin America and the Caribbean, Press: Inter-American Development Bank Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 2014
  8. OFGEM, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, Electricity distribution systems losses: Non-technical overview. UK, 2009
  9. Depuru, S.S.S.R, Modeling, detection, and prevention of electricity theft for enhanced performance and security of power grid. University of Toledo, (M.Sc. Thesis), Ohio, USA, 2012
  10. Smith, T.B, Electricity theft: A comparative analysis, Energy Policy, 2004, 32, 2067– 2076
  11. Sharma, T, Pandey, K.K, Punia, D.K, Rao, J, Of pilferers and poachers: Combating electricity theft in India, Energy Research & Social Science, 2016, 11, 40–52
  12. Duzgun, B, Komurgoz, G, Turkey's energy efficiency assessment: White certificates systems and their applicability in Turkey, Energy Policy, 2014, 65, 465–474
  13. Turkish Energy Efficiency Association, 2010. Certificate of energy efficiency strategy, 2010–2023. http://www.enver.org.tr/af597e8a-65a7-438a-a05d-a31b22f41405.pdf (accessed 01.03.16
  14. Karahan, H, Toptas, M, The effect of power distribution privatization on electricity prices in Turkey: Has liberalization served the purpose?, Energy Policy, 2013, 63, 614–621
  15. Çelen, A, Efficiency and productivity (TFP) of the Turkish electricity distribution companies: An