Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Cybernetics of Technology, Education and Politics in Technological Societies

Teknoloji Toplumlarında Teknoloji, Eğitim ve Politika Sibernetiği

Pages
562–572
Publication Date
2020-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper inquiries into the background and reasoning behind the use of these new techniques, which have been orchestrated for the persistence of establishing a form of plutocratic technocratic governance existing under the guise of democratic international relations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social cybernetics is the concept of manipulation and control, and it has been reincarnated and awakened into new shapes within technological society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study thereby focuses on the mobility of the governance of social cybernetics upon technology, education, and politics in the global political economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper inquiries into the background and reasoning behind the use of these new techniques, which have been orchestrated for the persistence of establishing a form of plutocratic technocratic governance existing under the guise of democratic international relations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sibernetik · Teknoloji Sosyolojisi · Eğitim Yönetişimi

Abstract

Social cybernetics is the concept of manipulation and control, and it has been reincarnated and awakened into new shapes within technological society. This study thereby focuses on the mobility of the governance of social cybernetics upon technology, education, and politics in the global political economy. This paper addresses the fundamental social cybernetics concerns through the political and philosophical history of technological development to argue whether or not the democratic principles have been globally and inappropriately rejected for the purpose of manipulation and control of the public. This paper inquiries into the background and reasoning behind the use of these new techniques, which have been orchestrated for the persistence of establishing a form of plutocratic technocratic governance existing under the guise of democratic international relations.

Özet

Sosyal sibernetik, güdümleme ve kontrol kavramıdır ve teknolojik toplum içinde yeniden doğdu ve yeni şekillere uyandırıldı. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, sosyal sibernetik yönetişiminim küresel politik ekonomideki teknoloji, eğitim ve politikaya yönelik hareketliliğine odaklanmaktadır. Bu makale, temel sosyal sibernetik ile ilgili olarak teknolojik gelişmenin politik ve felsefi tarihi yoluyla, demokratik ilkelerin halkın güdümleme ve kontrolü amacıyla küresel ve uygunsuz bir şekilde reddedilip reddedilmediğini tartışmaktadır. Bu makale, demokratik uluslararası ilişkiler kisvesi altında var olan bir tür çoğulcu teknokrattık yönetişim kurulmasının devam etmesi için düzenlenen bu yeni tekniklerin kullanımının arkasındaki gerekçelerini araştırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOLU, H. (2020). Cybernetics of Technology, Education and Politics in Technological Societies. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 562–572. https://ajindex.com/articles/108349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ball, J. Stephen, (2008),
  2. New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education, Political Studies: 56, 747–765.
  3. Banathy, H. Bala, (1996), Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. New York: Plenum Bernays, Edward, (1928),
  4. Propaganda, Routledge. Bingham, Tom, (2010, June 1), Lord Bingham: The Rule of Law, Retrieved from https://itc2u.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/lord-bingham-the-rule-of-law/
  5. Boyd, M. Gary, (1977), Towards a formalisation of educational cybernetics. In Rose, J. & Biliciu, C. (Eds.), Modern trends in cybernetics and systems, Vol. III (pp. 15-2 1). New York, NY: Springer. Bunge, Mario, (1977), Towards a technoethics. Monist, 60(1), 96-107.
  6. Butler, Samuel, (1863), The Book of the Machines, Dodo Press Caplan, Bryan, (2001), Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality, Kyklos, 54(1), 3-26.
  7. Chomsky, Noam, (1989), Necessary Illusion thought Control in Democratic Societies, Digital processing by The Electric Book Company 20 Cambridge Drive, London SE12 8AJ, UK. Chomsky, Noam, (2017), Chomsky: How the U.S. Developed Such a Scandalous Health System, Retrieved from https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/noam-chomsky-united-states-health-system-scandalous
  8. Dale, Roger, and Robertson, Suzan. (2007), Beyond Methodological ‘Isms’ in Comparative Education in an Era of Globalisation, in A. Kazamias and R. Cowan (eds) Handbook on Comparative Education Netherlands: Springer. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. (1972),
  9. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press.
  10. Dewey, John, (1980), The Middle Works, 1899-1924, SIU Press. Digitalright (2017, September 29), Russia threatens Facebook over data localization, Spain orders companies to censor Catalan referendum content, U.S. and EU complete first annual Privacy Shield review. Retrieved from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017/09/29/corporate-accountability-news-highlights-russia-threatens-facebook-data-localization/
  11. Durkheim, Emile, (1897/1951/2005), Suicide: A study in Sociology. (Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson) New York: Free Press; Taylor & Francis e-Library. Ellul, Jacques, (1964),
  12. The Technological Society, Trans. John Wilkinson. New York: Knopf, 1964. London: Jonathan Cape, 1965. Rev. ed.: New York: Knopf/Vintage, 1967.
  13. Gerovitch, Slava, (2002), From Newspeak to Cyberspeak. A history of Soviet Cybernetics. Cambridge, Giddens, Anthony, (1990),
  14. The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press Green, J. Edward, (2016), Liberalism and the Problem o