SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet / 2026 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2

Migration, Social Cohesion and Unaccompanied Children In The Context Of Social Work

Sosyal Hizmet Bağlamında Göç, Sosyal Uyum ve Refakatsiz Çocuk

Mehmet Başcıllar(İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0223-8050
Pages
726–742
Publication Date
2020-04-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The steps to be taken by social workers and other professionals in the field for the best interests of the unaccompanied child have been discussed in line with the needs of the unaccompanied child.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the concepts of migration, social cohesion, and unaccompanied children are discussed in the light of developments in the first quarter of the 21st century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Physical, mental and social difficulties faced by unaccompanied children who have had long and endless journeys, who are at risk of many social problems and whose basic rights and freedoms are at risk are considered in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The steps to be taken by social workers and other professionals in the field for the best interests of the unaccompanied child have been discussed in line with the needs of the unaccompanied child.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Refakatsiz çocuk · sosyal hizmet · göç

Abstract

In this study, the concepts of migration, social cohesion, and unaccompanied children are discussed in the light of developments in the first quarter of the 21st century. Physical, mental and social difficulties faced by unaccompanied children who have had long and endless journeys, who are at risk of many social problems and whose basic rights and freedoms are at risk are considered in this study. Challenges faced by unaccompanied children, first admission of the unaccompanied child, social work practice with unaccompanied children; the importance of family support; education for unaccompanied child; mental health services for an unaccompanied child, the legislation regarding unaccompanied children and social cohesion and unaccompanied children are among the subheadings of this article. The steps to be taken by social workers and other professionals in the field for the best interests of the unaccompanied child have been discussed in line with the needs of the unaccompanied child.

Özet

Bu çalışmada göç, sosyal uyum ve refakatsiz çocuk kavramları, 21. yüzyıl ilk çeyreğindeki gelişmeler ışığında ele alınmıştır. Olağanüstü koşullara bağlı olarak uzun ve sonu belirsiz bir yolculuğa çıkan, sosyal sorunların kıskacında kalan, temel hak ve özgürlükleri risk altında olan refakatsiz çocuğun bedensel, ruhsal ve sosyal alanda yaşadığı güçlüklere bu çalışmada yer verilmiştir. Refakatsiz çocukların karşılaştığı zorluklar, refakatsiz çocuğun ilk kabulü, refakatsiz çocuklarla sosyal hizmet uygulaması; ailenin önemi; refakatsiz çocuğun eğitimi; refakatsiz çocuğun ruh sağlığı, refakatsiz çocuklarla ilgili mevzuat ve sosyal uyum ve refakatsiz çocuk bu makalenin alt başlıkları arasında yer almaktadır. Refakatsiz çocuğun yüksek yararına yönelik sosyal hizmet uzmanları ve bu alandaki diğer profesyoneller tarafından atılması gereken adımlar refakatsiz çocuğun sosyal hizmet gereksinimleri doğrultusunda tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başcıllar, M. (2020). Migration, Social Cohesion and Unaccompanied Children In The Context Of Social Work. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2, 726–742. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.662978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Braybrooke, M. (2002, December). That community feeling. Professional Social Work.
  2. Çelikaksoy, A., & Wadensjö, E. (2017). Policies, Practices and Prospects: The Unaccompanied Minors in Sweden. Social Work and Society, 15 (1).
  3. Collett, J. (2004). Immigration is a Social Work Issue. In D. Hayes, & B. Humphries, Social Work, Immigration (pp. 77-96). Gateshead: Athenaeum Press.
  4. Crul, M., Keskiner, E., Lelie, F., & Ghaeminia, S. (2017). No Lost Generation? Education for refugee children.A comparison between Sweden,Germany,The Netherlands and Turkey. In R. Bauböck, & M. Tripkovic, The Integration of Migrants and Refugees:An EUI Forum on Migration,Citizenship and Demography (pp. 62-79). Florence: European University Institute.
  5. DGMM. (2013). Directorate General of Migration Management. Retrieved November 25, 2017, from http://www.goc.gov.tr/files/_dokuman19.pdf
  6. Hessle, S., & Hessle, M. (1999). Child Welfare in wartime and under post-war conditions:The Bosnian case as a point of departure for reflections on social wokr with refugees. In C. Williams, H. Soydan, & M. R.D.Johnson, Social Work and Minorities (pp. 139-155). London and New York: Routledge.
  7. Hickman, M. J., Mai, N., & Crowley, H. (2012). Migration and Social Cohesion in the UK. Palgrave Macmillan: 2012.
  8. Human Rights Watch. (2015). World Report:2015. US: Human Rights Watch.
  9. Humphries, B. (2006). Refugees, Asylum-seekers,Welfare. In D. Hayes, & B. Humphries, Social Work, Immigration and Asylum (pp. 42-58). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  10. ICRC. (2014). Refakatsiz ve Ailesinden Ayrı Düşmüş Çocuklara İlişkin Kurumlararası Rehber İlkeler. İsviçre: ICRC.
  11. Migration Observatory. (2017, November 01). Retrieved November 13, 2017, from http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/immigration-diversity-and-social-cohesion/
  12. MOFWSS. (2015, October 20). Ministry of Family, Work and Social Services. Retrieved November 19, 2017, from Refakatsiz Çocuk Yönergesi: http://cocukhizmetleri.aile.gov.tr/data/5639efb8369dc5844ccfa126/refakatsiz%20%C3%A7ocuk%20y%C3%B6nergesi.pdf
  13. Mynott, E., & Humphries, B. (2001). Young Separated Refugees,UK Practice and Europeanisation. Social Work in Europe, 9 (1), 18-27.
  14. SGDD. (2017). Mültecilerle Çalışmak. Ankara: Association for Solidarity with Asylum Seekers and Migrants.
  15. Soydan, H. (1998). Understanding Migration. In C. Williams, H. Soydan, & M. R. Johnson, Social Work and Minorities (pp. 20-35). London and New York: Routledge.
  16. The National Service Framework. (1999, September). Retrieved November 13, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/198051/National_Service_Framework_for_Mental_Health.pdf
  17. UNHCR. (2002). Retrieved November 25, 2017, from www.unhcr.org/50a5121b9.pdf
  18. UNHCR. (2016). Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2015. Geneva: UNHCR: The UN Refugee Agency.
  19. Valtonen, K. (2008). Social Work and Migration:Immigrant and Refugee Settlement and Integration. Burlington: Ashgate.
  20. Vertovec, S. (1999). Migration and Social Cohesion. Edward Elgar Pub.
  21. Williams, C., Soydan, H., & Johnson, M. R. (1998). Social Work And Minorities. London and New York: Routledge.
  22. Wilson, M. H. (2014). Unaccompanied Migrant Children:Overview & Recommendations. Social Justice Brief, 1-10.
  23. Wright, F. (2014). Social Work Practice with Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking. British Journal of Social Work (44), 1027–1044.
  24. Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Sigona, N., Flynn, D., Pasha, T., & Beynon, R. (2006). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: What are the links? York: Oxford Brookes University.
  25. Braybrooke, M. (2002, December). That community feeling. Professional Social Work.
  26. Çelikaksoy, A., & Wadensjö, E. (2017). Policies, Practices and Prospects: The Unaccompanied Minors in Sweden. Social Work and Society, 15 (1).
  27. Mynott, E., & Humphries, B. (2001). Young Separated Refugees,UK Practice and Europeanisation. Social Work in Europe, 9 (1), 18-27.
  28. Wilson, M. H. (2014). Unaccompanied Migrant Children:Overview & Recommendations. Social Justice Brief, 1-10.
  29. Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Sigona, N., Flynn, D., Pasha, T., & Beynon, R. (2006). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: What are the links? York: Oxford Brookes University.