Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3

The Effect of Mobile Phone on Hand Pain and Muscle Strength

Akıllı Telefon Kullanımının El Ağrısı ve Kas Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi

Ayşe Gül Kabakcı(CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MEDICINE)0000-0001-7144-8759
Sema Özandaç Polat(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0130-7376
Gamze Taşkın Şenol(ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5587-1055
Pages
611–616
Publication Date
2022-12-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study revealed that the duration of mobile phone use has an effect on grip and thumb flexion muscle strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Aim of the study determine the duration of mobile phone use on handgrip strength and thumb flexion muscle strength.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: There was a statistically significant difference in height and weight measurements between genders (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study revealed that the duration of mobile phone use has an effect on grip and thumb flexion muscle strength.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:El gücü · kaslar · akıllı telefon

Abstract

Background: Aim of the study determine the duration of mobile phone use on handgrip strength and thumb flexion muscle strength. Materials and method: The measurements were taken from hand dynamometer for handgrip strength and manual muscle tester for thumb flexion muscle strength. The means of the right and left handgrip strength, thumb flexion muscle strength were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in height and weight measurements between genders (p<0.05). We found as using of mobile phone increased, hand strength increased. However, the highest value of thumb muscle strength on the right and left sides was observed to be over 8 hours. There was a high relation between gender and muscle strength measurements (p<0.05; r=0.700). Conclusion: This study revealed that the duration of mobile phone use has an effect on grip and thumb flexion muscle strength.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı akıllı telefon kullanım süresinin el kavrama kuvveti ve baş parmak kas gücü üzerine etkisini tanımlamaktır. Materyal ve method: El kavrama kuvveti için el dinamometresinden ve başparmak fleksiyon kas kuvveti için manuel kas testi cihazından ölçümler alındı. Sağ ve sol el kavrama kuvveti, başparmak kas kuvveti ortalamaları ölçüldü. Bulgular: Cinsiyetler arasında boy ve kilo ölçümlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05). Akıllı telefon kullanım süresi arttıkça el gücünün arttığı görüldü. Ancak sağ ve sol tarafta başparmak fleksiyon kas kuvvetinin en yüksek değeri 8 saatin üzerindeydi. Cinsiyet ile kas gücü ölçümleri arasında yüksek bir ilişki bulundu (p<0.05; r=0.700). Sonuç: Bu çalışma, akıllı telefon kullanım süresinin el kavrama kuvveti ve başparmak kas kuvveti üzerinde etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kabakcı, A. G., Polat, S. Ö., Işık, E. İ., Şenol, G. T. (2022). The Effect of Mobile Phone on Hand Pain and Muscle Strength. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 611–616. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1187345

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Linscheid RL. Historical perspective of finger joint motion: The hand-me-downs of our predecessors. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.28764.
  2. Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:561–5. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2001322.
  3. Kamarul T, Ahmad TS, Loh WY. Hand grip strength in the adult Malaysian population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:172–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900601400213.
  4. Ekşioğlu M. Normative static grip strength of population of Turkey, effects of various factors and a comparison with international norms. Appl. Ergon. 2016;52:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.023.
  5. Demiroğlu M, Özkan K, Gür V, Öztürk K, Özkut A, Aykut S. Effect of hand dominance in grip and pinch strength and reference values in adults. Med. J. Bakirkoy. 2017;13:184–9. https://doi.org/10.5350/BTDMJB.20170517064703.
  6. Ersan MF. Kahramanmaraş İl Merkezinde Çalışan Marangozlarda Görülen El Yaralanmalarının Değerlendirilmesi (Uzmanlık tezi). Kahramanmaras, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Universitesi. 2006.
  7. Sanal HT. El ve el bileǧi kemik doku yaralanmalari: Nedenler, işgücü kaybi. Gulhane Med. J. 2006;48:215–7.
  8. Mathiowetz V, Rennells C, Donahoe L. Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:694–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(85)80210-0.
  9. Süslü FE. El Osteoartritinin Postmenopozal Kadınların El Kuvveti, El Fonksiyonları, İnce El Becerileri ve Günlük Yaşam Aktiviteleri Üzerine Etkisi (Uzmanlık tezi). Isparta, Süleyman Demirel Universitesi, 2008.
  10. Schreuders TAR, Roebroeck M, van der Kar TJM, Soeters JNM, Hovius SER, Stam HJ. Strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand measured with a hand-held dynamometer: Reliability in patients with ulnar and median nerve paralysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25 B:560–5. https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2000.0415.
  11. Charles LE, Burchfiel CM, Fekedulegn D, Kashon ML, Ross GW, Sanderson WT, et al. Occupational and other risk factors for hand-grip strength: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Occup. Environ. Med 2006;63:820–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.027813.
  12. Mullerpatan RP, Karnik G, John R. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for healthy Indian adults. Hand Ther. 2013;18:11–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758998313479874.
  13. Shin G, Zhu X. User discomfort, work posture and muscle activity while using a touchscreen in a desktop PC setting. Ergonomics. 2011;54:733–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.592604.
  14. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, Desrosiers J, Bear-Lehman J. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2006;92:11–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003.
  15. Aras Ö, Aras B, Yilmaz İ, Kabay SC. Parkinson’lu Olgularda Kas Kuvvet Değerlendirmelerinin Test- Tekrar Test Güvenirliği. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi. 2009;2:122–5.
  16. Kim SY, Koo SJ. Effect of duration of smartphone use on muscle fatigue and pain caused by forward head posture in adults. J. Phys. Ther. Sci 2016;28:1669–72. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1669.
  17. Polat S, Uygur AG, Yücel AH. Determination of body composition and somatotype measurements in healthy child between 3 and 6 years old. Journal of Harran University Medical Faculty. 2019; 16(2): 257-265. https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.524584
  18. Sarwar M, Soomro TR. Impact of Smartphone ’s on Soci ety. Eur. J. Res. 2013;98:216–26.
  19. Peraman R, Parasuraman S. Mobile phone mania: Arising global threat in public health. J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. 2016;7:198–200. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.184712.
  20. De-Sola J, Talledo H, Rubio G, de Fonseca FR. Development of a mobile phone addiction craving scale and its validation in a spanish adult population. Front. Psychiatry. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00090.
  21. Parasuraman S, Sam AT, Yee SWK, Chuon BLC, Ren LY. Smartphone usage and increased risk of mobile phone addiction: A concurrent study. Int. J. Curr. 2017;7:125–31.
  22. George A, Schneider-Gold C, Zier S, Reiners K, Sommer C. Musculoskeletal pain in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2. Arch. Neurol. 2004;61:1938–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.12.1938.
  23. Hébert LJ, Remec JF, Saulnier J, Vial C, Puymirat J. The use of muscle strength assessed with handheld dynamometers as a non-invasive biological marker in myotonic dystrophy type 1 patients: A multicenter study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010;11:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-72.
  24. Manoharan VS, Sundaram SG, Jason JI. Factors Affecting Hand Grip Strength and Its Evaluation: a Systemic Review. Int. J. Physiother. 2015;3:1288–93. https://doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2015.193.
  25. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701300006524.
  26. Demirel P. El Antropometrik Ölçümleri ve El Kavrama Kuvvetinin Farklı Spor Branşlarında Karşılaştırılması (Yüksek lisans tezi). Zonguldak, Zonguldak Karaelmas Universitesi, 2005.
  27. Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2005;35:605–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.007.
  28. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip Strength and Hand Dominance: Challenging the 10% Rule. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:444–7.
  29. Xu S, Morse AM, Lacy B, Baggett LS, Gogola GR. Peg Restrained Intrinsic Muscle Evaluator (PRIME): Development, reliability, and normative values of a device to quantify intrinsic hand muscle strength in children. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36:894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.006.
  30. McQuiddy VA, Scheerer CR, Lavalley R, McGrath T, Lin L. Normative Values for Grip and Pinch Strength for 6- to 19-Year-Olds. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1627–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.018.
  31. Molenaar HMT, Selles RW, Schreuders TAR, Hovius SER, Stam HJ. Reliability of Hand Strength Measurements Using the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer in Children. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:1796–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.018.
  32. Polat S, Ögüt E, Göker P, Bozkır MG, Yücel AH. Reference values for hand muscle strength evaluation methods in healthy young adults. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32:921–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170915.
  33. Gustafsson E, Johnson PW, Hagberg M. Thumb postures and physical loads during mobile phone use - A comparison of young adults with and without musculoskeletal symptoms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.11.010.
  34. Kim S-Y, Koo S-J. Effect of duration of smartphone use on muscle fat. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016;28:1669–72.
  35. Park J-H, Kang S-Y, Jeon H-S. The Effect of Using Smart-Phones on Neck and Shoulder Muscle Activities and Fatigue. Phys. Ther. Korea. 2013;20:19–26. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2013.20.3.019.
  36. Kim JH, Aulck L, Bartha MC, Harper CA, Johnson PW. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards. Appl. Ergon. 2014;45:1406–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.001.
  37. Lee JI, Song HS. The Correlation Analysis between Hours of Smartphone Use And Neck Pain in the Gachon University Students. The Acupuncture. 2014;31:99–109.
  38. Hu Y, Long X, Lyu H, Zhou Y, Chen J. Alterations in white matter integrity in young adults with smartphone dependence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017;11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00532.
  39. Badil Güloğlu S, Yalçın Ü. The Effect of Smartphone Addiction on Neck Pain and Disability in University Students. Kafkas J. Med. Sci. 2021;11:225–30. http://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2021.75057.