Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

An Evaluation of Corporate Social Innovation Approaches and Practices of Public and Private Hospitals in Turkey

Türkiye’deki Kamu ve Özel Sektör Hastanelerinde Kurumsal Sosyal İnovasyon Yaklaşım ve Uygulamalarına Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme

Pages
261–278
Publication Date
2020-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was found that there were significant relationships between the type of hospitals and the resource allocation and innovation department of innovation activities, and the general level of institutional social innovation approach and application levels of hospitals were above average in a 5-point Likert scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to make a descriptive assessment for public and private sector hospitals practices and applications of corporate social innovation approach in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The questionnaire used as data collection tool were applied to 140 senior executives working in 140 public and private hospitals operating in 14 cities of 7 regions of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was found that there were significant relationships between the type of hospitals and the resource allocation and innovation department of innovation activities, and the general level of institutional social innovation approach and application levels of hospitals were above average in a 5-point Likert scale.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social innovation · corporate social innovation · hospital

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to make a descriptive assessment for public and private sector hospitals practices and applications of corporate social innovation approach in Turkey. For this reason, it has been determined by a new developed scale whether public and private sector hospitals have or no level of governance characteristics that will ensure the development of social innovation. The questionnaire used as data collection tool were applied to 140 senior executives working in 140 public and private hospitals operating in 14 cities of 7 regions of Turkey. Factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square test, t test and variance analysis were used for data analysis. As a result of the study, it was found that there were significant relationships between the type of hospitals and the resource allocation and innovation department of innovation activities, and the general level of institutional social innovation approach and application levels of hospitals were above average in a 5-point Likert scale. It has been determined that managers' views on corporate social innovation differ significantly according to the type of hospital, resource allocation and innovation department.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye’deki kamu ve özel sektör hastanelerinin kurumsal sosyal inovasyon yaklaşım ve uygulamalarına yönelik betimsel bir değerlendirme yapmaktır. Bu nedenle kamu ve özel sektör hastanelerinin, sosyal inovasyonun gelişimini sağlayacak yönetişim özelliklerine hangi düzeyde sahip olduğu geliştirilen yeni bir ölçek ile belirlenmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılan anket, Türkiye'nin 7 bölgesinden 14 şehirde faaliyet gösteren 140 kamu ve özel sektör hastanesinin 140 üst düzey yöneticisine uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde faktör analizi, güvenirlik analizi, betimsel istatistikler Ki-Kare testi, t testi ve varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, hastanelerin türü ile inovasyon faaliyetlerine kaynak ayırma ve inovasyon departmanı olma durumu arasında anlamlı ilişkiler olduğu, genel olarak hastanelerin kurumsal sosyal inovasyon yaklaşım ve uygulama düzeylerinin 5'li Likert derecelemesinde ortalamanın üzerinde olduğu ve kurumsal sosyal inovasyona yönelik yönetici görüşlerinin hastane türü, inovasyona kaynak ayırma ve inovasyon departmanı olma durumuna göre anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNA, Ö., KILIÇ, İ. (2020). An Evaluation of Corporate Social Innovation Approaches and Practices of Public and Private Hospitals in Turkey. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 261–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/108031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aslan, Ö., Boz, C. ve Cerit, M. (2018). Sağlık inovasyonu üzerine kavramsal bir çerçeve ve sağlıkta dönüşüm programı, Social Sciences Studies Journal, 4(15), 786-798.
  2. Balamatsias, G. (2019). 8 Examples of corporate social innovation worth considering in your company. Social Innovation Academy,http://www.socialinnovationacademy.eu/8-examplesof-corporate-social-innovation-worth-considering-in-your-company/
  3. Bartlett, D. ve Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector ınnovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from local government. LocalGovernment Studies, 28(4), 107-121.
  4. Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and ınnovation in the public sector. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476.
  5. Davies, A. ve Boelman, V. (2016). Social ınnovation ın health and social care, Policy Paper, January. Esen, A. ve Maden, C. (2015).
  6. Kurumsal sosyal inovasyon. HBR Dergi, Mayıs, https://hbrturkiye.com/dergi/kurumsal-sosyal-inovasyon European commission, social ınnovation. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/ policy/social_fr Enright, K. P. ve Bourns, C. (2010).The case for stakeholder engagement.Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring. EuropeanUnion / The Young Foundation (2010). Study on social ınnovation. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Study-on-Social-Innovation-forthe-Bureau-of-European-Policy-Advisors-March-2010.pdf
  7. Frost Perspectives (2016). Social ınnovation in healthcare– Hitachi'sApproach.https://ww2.frost.com/frost-perspectives/social-innovationhealthcarehitachis-approach/
  8. Gerhard, E.B., Hoelscher, M. ve Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research, (40)3, 48-78.
  9. George, M. (2016). 5 Things every company must do to be a social innovator. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/02/5-things-every-company-must-do-to-be-a-socialinnovator/ (Erişim tarihi: 11.10.2018).
  10. Googins, B.ve Mirvis, P. (2017). Innovating for a better world: The rise of corporate social innovation. https://www.conference-board.org/blog/postdetail.cfm?post=6497 (Erişim tarihi: 11.10.2018).
  11. Halaç, D. S., Eren, H. ve Bulut, Ç (2014). Sosyal yenilikçilik: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (32)1, 165-190.
  12. Handayani, T.I.T, Sembiring, J. ve Musta’in, A. (2018). The ınfluence of organization culture and organizationstructure on the implementation of innovation process in telkom divisi digital service (DDS). Jurnal Bisnis&Manajemen, (XIX) 1:13-22.
  13. Herbig, P