Journals / Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 31 Issue: 1

Social Media Addiction as a Moderator Between Happiness and Leisure Boredom

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the simple slope analysis, the happiness-boredom relationship is strong in those with low social media addiction (β= .466) and weak in those with high social media addiction (β= .285).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the moderating role of social media addiction in the effect of happiness on the perception of boredom in leisure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of members of youth centres in the province and districts of Karaman (n=431).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the simple slope analysis, the happiness-boredom relationship is strong in those with low social media addiction (β= .466) and weak in those with high social media addiction (β= .285).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Happiness · Boredom perception in leisure · Social media addiction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the moderating role of social media addiction in the effect of happiness on the perception of boredom in leisure. The study was designed using a correlational survey model. The study group consisted of members of youth centres in the province and districts of Karaman (n=431). The Oxford Happiness Scale Short Form, the Perceived Boredom in Leisure Scale, and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale were used as data collection tools. Confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, hierarchical regression analysis, and multi-group analysis were applied in the analysis of the data. According to the findings, happiness significantly predicts the perception of boredom in leisure in a positive direction (β= .378, p<.001). The moderating effect of social media addiction was found to be significant (β= -.104, p<.01). According to the results of the simple slope analysis, the happiness-boredom relationship is strong in those with low social media addiction (β= .466) and weak in those with high social media addiction (β= .285). Multiple group analyses revealed that the moderator effect was significant among males, low social media users, and individuals over the age of 26. In conclusion, social media addiction moderates the relationship between happiness and perceived boredom in leisure in a weakening direction.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çuhadar, A. (2026). Social Media Addiction as a Moderator Between Happiness and Leisure Boredom. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 31 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53434/gbesbd.1846951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
  2. Akay, B., Ayhan, R., Orhan, R. & Öçalan, M. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinin serbest zaman yönetimi ile teknoloji bağımlılık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies, 9(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.1168021
  3. Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184.
  4. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  5. Camerini, A. L., Morlino, S. & Marciano, L. (2023). Boredom and digital media use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100313
  6. Casale, S., Akbari, M., Seydavi, M., Bocci Benucci, S. & Fioravanti, G. (2023). Has the prevalence of problematic social media use increased over the past seven years and since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic? A meta-analysis of the studies published since the development of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 147, 107838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107838
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  9. Demirci, İ. (2019). Bergen Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması, depresyon ve anksiyete belirtileriyle ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 20(Ek Sayı 1), 15-22.
  10. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
  11. Dogan, T. & Sapmaz, F. (2012). Examination of psychometric properties of the Turkish version form of the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire in university students. Dusunen Adam, 25(4), 297.
  12. Doğan, T. & Çötok, N. A. (2011). Oxford mutluluk ölçeği kısa formunun Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of the short form of the Oxford happiness questionnaire into Turkish: A validity and reliability study]. Türk psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik dergisi, 4(36), 165-172.
  13. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  14. Frederick, S. & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302-329). Russell Sage Foundation.
  15. Funder, D. C. & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
  16. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 14.0 update.
  17. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
  18. Güzel, P., Tez, Ö. Y. & Esentaş, M. (2020). Serbest zaman doyumunun mutluluk üzerindeki etkisinde cinsiyetin düzenleyici rolü. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.711055
  19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7. baskı). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  21. Hazar, Z. & Ekici, F. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin dijital oyun bağımlılığı ile zorbalık bilişleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 26(1), 1-15.
  22. Hills, P. & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and individual differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.
  23. Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  24. Iso-Ahola, S. E. & Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and Boredom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 356-364.
  25. Iso-Ahola, S. E. & Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), 1-17.
  26. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
  27. Kara, F. M. & Ayverdi, B. (2018). Is the Leisure Boredom Predictor of Drinking Motives of University Students?. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 23(1), 35-42.
  28. Kara, F. M. & Gürbüz, B. (2022). Serbest zamanlarda sıkılma algısı: İnternet bağımlılığı ve algılanan sosyal yetkinlik ilişkisi. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.33468/sbsebd.282
  29. Kara, F. M. (2019). Internet addiction: Relationship with perceived freedom in leisure, perception of boredom and sensation seeking. Higher Education Studies, 9(2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n2p131
  30. Kara, F. M., Öncü, E. & Gürbüz, B. (2014). Leisure Boredom Scale: the Factor Structure and the Demographic Differences. The Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 16(2), 28–35.
  31. Karakaş, G., Eskiler, E. & Serdar, E. (2025). The moderating role of gender in the relationship between leisure involvement and life satisfaction. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 30(3), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.53434/gbesbd.1708604
  32. Karaküçük, S. & Yetim, A. (1996). Rekreasyon Etkinliklerinde Liderlik ve Fonksiyonları. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 1(1), 64-76.
  33. Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (18. baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  34. Kuykendall, L., Tay, L. & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 364-403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508
  35. Longstreet, P. & Brooks, S. (2017). Life satisfaction: A key to managing internet and social media addiction. Technology in Society, 50, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.05.003
  36. Noyan, C. O., Enez Darçın, A., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O. & Dilbaz, N. (2015). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ölçeğinin kısa formunun üniversite öğrencilerinde Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16(Özel Sayı 1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.176101
  37. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  38. Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D. & Miller, E. (2017). Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010
  39. Serdar, E., Demirel, M. & Harmandar Demirel, D. (2022). The relationship between the leisure boredom, leisure satisfaction, and smartphone addiction: A study on university students. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.235
  40. Spiers, A. & Walker, G. J. (2008). The effects of ethnicity and leisure satisfaction on happiness, peacefulness, and quality of life. Leisure Sciences, 31(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400802558277
  41. Yaşartürk, F., Akyüz, H. & Karataş, İ. (2017). Examination of University Students’ Levels of Leisure Boredom Perception and Life Satisfaction towards Recreative Activities. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies (IntJCSS), 3(Special Issue 2), 239-252.
  42. Yusufoğlu, Ö. Ş. (2017). Boş zaman faaliyeti olarak akıllı telefonlar ve sosyal yaşam üzerine etkileri: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(5), 2414-2434.