SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS: THE CASE OF RINEP (POLICE EDUCATIONAL INTERNATIONALIZATION NETWORK)

TEORİK TEMELLER KAPSAMINDA STRATEJİK İŞBİRLİKLERİ: RINEP (ULUSLARARASI KOLLUK EĞİTİM AĞI) ÖRNEĞİ

Ümit Şevik(JANDARMA VE SAHİL GÜVENLİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3543-5923
Pages
365–386
Publication Date
2024-11-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of the study, it was evaluated that strategic alliances should be based on theoretical foundations in order to be sustainable, and suggestions were made for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the theoretical foundations of RINEP, a network created for the internationalization of law enforcement training, within the scope of strategic alliance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strategic alliances established for the purpose of sharing all resources, including information, developing competence and providing competitive advantage are basically based on institutional theory, network theory, knowledge-based approach, social change theory and organizational learning theory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of the study, it was evaluated that strategic alliances should be based on theoretical foundations in order to be sustainable, and suggestions were made for future studies.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stratejik işbirlikleri · Teorik temeller · RINEP

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the theoretical foundations of RINEP, a network created for the internationalization of law enforcement training, within the scope of strategic alliance. Strategic alliances established for the purpose of sharing all resources, including information, developing competence and providing competitive advantage are basically based on institutional theory, network theory, knowledge-based approach, social change theory and organizational learning theory. In order to determine the theoretical foundations of RINEP, which is evaluated within the scope of strategic alliance, qualitative research method was used in the study, RINEP's official website and statutes were evaluated by document analysis with a case study design, and qualitative descriptive analysis was used as the data analysis technique. As a result of the descriptive analysis, it was determined that RINEP, established within the scope of strategic alliance, is based on theoretical foundations such as institutional theory, knowledge-based approach, network theory, social change theory and organizational learning. Within the scope of the study, it was evaluated that strategic alliances should be based on theoretical foundations in order to be sustainable, and suggestions were made for future studies.

Özet

Bu çalışma kolluk eğitiminin uluslararasılaştırılmasına yönelik oluşturulan bir ağ olan RINEP’in stratejik işbirliği kapsamında hangi teorik temellere dayandığını tespit etmek maksadıyla yapılmıştır. Bilgi dahil tüm kaynakların paylaşımı, yetkinlik geliştirme ve rekabet avantajı sağlamak maksadıyla kurulan stratejik işbirlikleri temel olarak kurumsal kuram, ağ kuramı, bilgi temelli yaklaşım, sosyal değişim teorisi ve örgütsel öğrenme teorisine dayanmaktadır. Stratejik işbirliği kapsamında değerlendirilen RINEP’in teorik temellerini tespit etmek maksadıyla yapılan çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmış olup durum çalışması deseniyle RINEP’in kurumsal web sitesinde bulunan bilgiler ve tüzükleri doküman incelemesi ile değerlendirilmiş ve veri analiz tekniği olarak nitel betimsel analiz kullanılmıştır. Betimsel analiz sonucunda stratejik işbirliği kapsamında kurulan RINEP’in kurumsal kuram, bilgi temelli yaklaşım, ağ kuramı, sosyal değişim teorisi ve örgütsel öğrenme gibi teorik temellere dayandığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında stratejik ittifakların sürdürülebilir olabilmesi için teorik temellere dayanması gerektiği değerlendirilerek gelecek çalışmalar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şevik, Ü. (2024). STRATEGIC ALLIANCES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS: THE CASE OF RINEP (POLICE EDUCATIONAL INTERNATIONALIZATION NETWORK). Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 365–386. https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.1321215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Avcı, E. (2021). Kamu diplomasisi aktörü olarak Jandarma Teşkilatı. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 1-29.
  2. Banerji, K. ve Sambharya, R. B. (1998). Effect of network organization on alliance formation: a study of the Japanese automobile ancillary industry. Journal of International Management, 4(1), 41-57.
  3. Bangara, A., Freeman, S. ve Schroder, W. (2012). Legitimacy and accelerated internationalisation: An Indian perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 623-634.
  4. Camisón, C., Boronat, M. ve Villar, A. (2007). Technical strategic alliances and performance: The mediating effect of knowledge-based competencies. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, ed. Referencia: WP-EC, 11.
  5. Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M. ve Paleari, S. (2016). Why do universities internationalize? Organizational reputation and legitimacy. University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness, 32, 327-346.
  6. Cegarra‐Navarro, J. G. (2005). An empirical investigation of organizational learning through strategic alliances between SMEs. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 13(1), 3-16.
  7. Culpan, R. (2008). The role of strategic alliances in gaining sustainable competitive advantage for firms. Management Revue, 19(1/2), 94-105.
  8. Çakar, M. ve Danışman, A. (2012). Kurumsal Kuram. Sözen, H.C. ve Basım, H.N. (Ed), Örgüt Kuramları (s.241-269) içinde. Beta Yayınları.
  9. Çelik, H., Baykal, N. B. ve Memur, H. N. K. (2020). Nitel veri analizi ve temel ilkeleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1), 379-406.
  10. Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C. ve Roy, J. P. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169-187.
  11. Das, T. K. ve Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283.
  12. Dickson, P. H. ve Weaver, K. M. (2011). Institutional readiness and small to medium‐sized enterprise alliance formation. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 126-148.
  13. Elmuti, D., Abebe, M. ve Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 115-129.
  14. Genç, N. ve İyigün, N. Ö. (2011). The role of organizational learning and knowledge transfer in building strategic alliances: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1124-1133.
  15. Guerrero Nieto, G. E. (2020). La internacionalización como proceso de fortalecimiento de los sistemas educativos policiales: Un estudio en el marco de la Red de Internacionalización Educativa Policial (RINEP) en Colombia, México y Honduras. Retrieved from https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/doct_educacion_sociedad/46.
  16. He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E. ve Child, J. (2020). Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 589-617.
  17. Hermens, A. (2001). Knowledge exchange in strategic alliances: Learning in tension. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(3), 189-200.
  18. Hoelz, J. C. ve Bataglia, W. (2022). Corporate reputation and strategic alliance performance. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(3), 161-175.
  19. Inkpen, A. (1998). Learning, knowledge acquisition, and strategic alliances. European Management Journal, 16(2), 223-229.
  20. JSGA (2023). https://www.jsga.edu.tr/jsga-baskanligi-iki-yil-sureyle-2023-2024-uluslararasi-kolluk-egitim-agina-rinep-ev-sahipligi-yapmaya-hak-kazanmistir adresinden 28.06.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  21. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5-31.
  22. Koçel, T. (2018). İşletme yöneticiliği (17. Baskı). Beta Yayınevi.
  23. Lin, H. ve Darnall, N. (2015). Strategic alliance formation and structural configuration. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 549-564.
  24. Liou, J. J., Tzeng, G. H., Tsai, C. Y. ve Hsu, C. C. (2011). A hybrid ANP model in fuzzy environments for strategic alliance partner selection in the airline industry. Applied Soft Computing, 11(4), 3515-3524.
  25. Lioukas, C. S. ve Reuer, J. J. (2015). Isolating trust outcomes from exchange relationships: Social exchange and learning benefits of prior ties in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1826-1847.
  26. Meyer, C. B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329-352.
  27. Mirić, A. A., Burton, R. M. ve Petković, M. (2013). Coordinating inter-organizational learning throughout alliance evolution. Network Governance: Alliances, Cooperatives and Franchise Chains, 11-32.
  28. Molina-Garzón, A. L., Moreno-Daza, J. ve Velásquez-Aponte, D. (2020). Leadership from the perspective of the Police Educational Internationalization Network. Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 12(3), 84-97.
  29. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. ve Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77-91.
  30. Muthusamy, S. K. ve White, M. A. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization studies, 26(3), 415-441.
  31. Özen, Ş. (2010). Yeni kurumsal kuram: Örgütleri çözümlemede yeni ufuklar ve yeni sorunlar, Sargut, A.S. ve Özen, Ş. (Ed.). Örgüt Kuramları (s.237-330) içinde. İmge Kitabevi.
  32. Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş, nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (1. Baskı). (D. Bayrak, B. Arslan ve Z. Akyüz, Çev.). Siyasal Kitabevi (Orijinal eserin basım tarihi 2005, 2. Baskı).
  33. Parise, S. ve Sasson, L. (2002). Leveraging knowledge management across strategic alliances. Ivey Business Journal, 66(4), 41-47.
  34. Podolny, J. M. ve Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57-76.
  35. RINEP (2023). About RINEP. https://rinep.policia.edu.co/rinep/ adresinden 28.06.2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  36. Russo, M. ve Cesarani, M. (2017). Strategic alliance success factors: A literature review on alliance lifecycle. International Journal of Business Administration, 8(3), 1-9.
  37. Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668-698.
  38. Takyi, L. N., Naidoo, V. ve Dogbe, C. S. K. (2022). Government support, strategic alliance and internationalization: Evidence from indigenous Ghanaian exporters. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 619-638.
  39. Tiwari, S. K., Sen, S. ve Shaik, R. (2016). Internationalization: A study of small firms from emerging markets. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(6), 355-364.
  40. Ülgen, H. ve Mirze, S.K. (2007). İşletmelerde stratejik yönetim (4.Baskı). Arıkan Yayınevi.
  41. Wijk, R. V., Bosch, F. A. V. D. ve Volberda, H. W. (2012). Organizing knowledge in social, alliance, and organizational networks. In M. Easterby-Smith ve M.A. Lyles (Ed.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (s.s. 477-504). Wiley.
  42. Yan, L. (2004). Role of organizational learning in strategic alliance. Retrieved April, 20.
  43. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri, (11. Baskı), Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  44. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1). 1-6.
  45. Zhou, Y., Gomes, E. ve Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2023). Learning ‘from’vs. learning ‘about’partners in pre-acquisition strategic alliances: The role of familiarity. Long Range Planning, 56(6), 102386.