SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 61 Sayı: 02

Spatial Development and ITT Policies As Cohesetion Means in the EU and Turkey

AB ve Türkiye'de Bütünleşmenin Bir Aracı Olarak Mekansal Gelişme ve BİT Politikaları

Mehmet Marin
Pages
175–209
Publication Date
2006-02-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

Marin, M. (2006). Spatial Development and ITT Policies As Cohesetion Means in the EU and Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 61 Sayı: 02, 175–209. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (70)

  1. AKTT (1999), Gündem 2000: Genişleme-1999 Y,lı Aday Ülkeler /lerleme Rapodan, Avrupa Komisyonu Türkiye Temsilciliği (Avrupa Komisyonu).
  2. AKTT, (2000), 2000 Yılı Genişleme Stratejisi, Avrupa Komsiyonu Türkiye Temsilciliği (Avrupa Komisyonu).
  3. ANGELL, lan (1995), "Winners and Losers in the Information Age," LSEMagazine: 10-12.
  4. BECKMANN, Martin J. (1999), Lectures on Location Theory (Berlin: Springer).
  5. BOARNET, Marlon G/MEDDA, Francesca (2003), "An Analysis of the Transportation arnd Land Use Links," the Paper Presented at Second Meeting of STELLA (Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisions with America) Focus Group 3, (Washington, USA).
  6. BORJA, JordilCASTELLS, Manuel (1997), Local and Global: Management of of Cities in the Information Age (London: Earthscan Publication Ltd).
  7. BOYCE, Ronal Reed (1974), The Bases of Economic Geography (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.).
  8. BOZKURT, Veysel (2000), Enformasyon Toplumu ve Türkiye (Ankara: Sistem Yayıncılık, 3. Baskı).
  9. CAMAGNI, Roberto (2003), "Regional Clusters, Regional Competencies and Regional Competition," Paper Presented at the International Conference on Cluster Management in Structural Policy-International Experiences and Consequences for Northrhine- Westfalia (Duisburg).
  10. CAMAGNI, Roberto (1991), "Local 'Milieu', Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Toward a New Dynamic Theory of Economic Space," CAMAGNI, Roberto (ed.), Innovation Networks (London: Belhaven Press).
  11. CAPORASO, J. A. (1996), "The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern," Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 11: 29-52.
  12. CAPPELIN, Ricardo (1991), "International Networks of Cities," Roberto Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives (London: Belhaven Press).
  13. CASTELLS, Manuel i HALL, Peter (1997), "Technopoles: Mines and Foundries of the Informational Economy," LEGATES, Richard T.I STOUT, Fredric (eds.), The City Reader, (London: Routledge):
  14. CASTELLS, Manuel (19n), Urban Question (London: Arnold).
  15. CEC (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of tlııe European Communities).
  16. CEC (1991), Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community's Territory, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  17. CEC (1994), Europe 2000+: Coooperation for European Territorial Development, Commission of the European Communities (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  18. CEMAT (2000), The Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent, European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning (Hanover: Council of Europe).
  19. CHRISTALLER, Walter (1966), Central Places in Southern Germany (Prentice Hall) (Translation: Charliste W. Baskin).
  20. CRAFTS, Nicolasl VENABLES Anthony J. (2001), "Globalization in History: a Geographic Perspective, [Access 02106/2004], http://www.proses.sciences-po.fr/documents/ Crafts_ Venables_ Global isation_History. pdf.
  21. CSD (1999), European Spatial Development Perspective -Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Commission on Spatial Development (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities).
  22. DUPUY,Alex (1998), "Thoughts on Globalization, Marxism and the Left," Latin American Perspectives, November 25: 55-60.
  23. DPT (2000), Uzun Vadeli Strateji ve Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkmma Planı 2001-2005 (Ankara) [Access: 19/08/2004].http://www.dpt.gov.tr.
  24. EC(1997), The EU Compendium of Spatia/ Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies 28), European Commission (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities).
  25. EC(1999), ESDPEuropean Spatial Development Perspective, EuropeanCommıssion,(Luxembourg) [Access: 02/06/2004], http://europa.eu. int!comm/regional poLicy/sources/ docoffic/ officiall reports/ som_en.htm
  26. ERKUT, Gülden/ BAYPıNAR,Mete Başar (2003), "EU Integration and the Change of Spatial Organization in Turkey," the Paper Presented at The 43rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association (Jyvaskyla, Finland).
  27. ERKUT, Gülen et aL. (2001), "Avrupa Birliği'ne Geçiş Sürecinde Bölge Planlama Eğitiminin Değerlendirilmesi," TMMOBŞehir Plancılan Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOBŞetııir Plancılan Odasıve OTDÜŞehir ve BölgePlanlamaBölümü): 111-125.
  28. ESPON(2004), What is Spatial Planning?, European Spatial Planning ObservatliJry Network [Access:02/12/2004], http://www.espon.org.uk/spatialplanning.htm.
  29. ESPON(2002), Enlargement of the European Union and the Wider European Perspective as Regards its Polycentric Spatial Structure, Tender to the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON): Action 1.1.3., EuropeanSpatial Planning Observatory Network (Seweden).
  30. ESPON(2002b), Action 1.1.3: Enlargement of the European Union and the Wider European Perspective as Regards its Polycentric Spatial Structure, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (Sweden).
  31. FALUDI,Andreas (2001), "Introduction: The EuropeanSpatial Development Perspective (ESDP)," Paper Presented at American Planning Association 2001 National Planning Conference (New Orleans).
  32. FISHMAN,Robert (1998), "Urban Utopias: Ebenezer Howard and Le Corbusier," CAMPELL,Scott!
  33. FAINSTEIN,Susan (Eds.) Readings in Planning Theory (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers): 19-67.
  34. FLANAGAN,William G. (1993), Contemporary Urban Sociology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  35. GALLIANO,Danielle/ROUX, Pascale (2001), Spatial Externalities, Organization of firm and its Adoption: the Specificities of french Agro-food Firms, Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique [Access: 03/07/2004], http://www.toulouse. inra.fr/centre/ esr/ wpRePEc/gaI200115.pdf.
  36. GEDiKLi, Bahar (2002) "Spatial Policies within the Framework of European Union and Turkish Planing SystemVis-a-Vis these Policies," Paper Presented at the EURA Conference on Urban and Spatial European Policies: Levels of Territorial Government (Turrin, Italy).
  37. GERAY,Cevat (1999), "Kırsal Kalkınma Yöneltileri, ilçe Yerel Yönetimi ve 'ilçe Köy Birlikleri' Önerisi," Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 8/2: 11.42.
  38. GEZICI, Ferhan/HEWINGS,Geoffrey J. D. (2003), "Spatial Analysis of Regional Inequalities in Turkey", Paper Presented at the 4 th Congress of European Regional Science (Jvvaskyla, Finland) [Access: 06/07/2004], http://www.ersa.org/ ersaconfs/ersa03/ cdrom/papers/99.pdf.
  39. GORDON, Richard (1994), Internationalization, Multinationalization, Globalization: Contradictory World Economics and New Spatial Division of Labor, Working Paper 94 (Santa Cruz, Ca.: University of California Center for the Study of Global Transformations).
  40. GUTH, Micheal (2000), "From Technology Policy for Regions to Regional Technology Policy: toward a New Technology Policy in the EU," Paper Presented at The 4 th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation (Curitiba).
  41. HARVEY, David (1999) Limits to Capital (London: Verso, New Edition).
  42. HARVEY, David (1989) Conditions of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell).
  43. HARVEY, David (1973) Social Justice and the City (London: Arnord).
  44. ISARD, Walter (1956), Location and Space-Economy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  45. JENSEN, Ole B. et aL. (1996), "INTERREG ilC - A Loophole for Transnational Planning," Nordrevy, 5/6: 13-19.
  46. KATZNELSON, Ira (1993), Marxism and the City (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  47. KESKiNOK, çağatay (2001), "Türkiye de Kent Planlamanın Sorunlan ve Avrupa Birliği Süreci: Bir Karşıt Görüş," TMMOB Şehir Plancılan Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancılan Odası and
  48. OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü): 129-139.
  49. KEYDER, C. i ÖNCÜ, A. (1994), "Globalization of a Third-World Metropolis: Istanbul in the 1980s," Review, 17/3: 383-421.
  50. KOMORNICKI, Tomasz (2002) "Impacts of Border Regime Institutions on Transport Network Development in Case of Central and Eastem Europe," Paper Presented at the STELLA Transatlantic Thematic Network Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisons with America, Focus Group 5 Kick-off Meeting (Brussels).
  51. LAPPLE, Dieter (2001), "City and Region in the Age of Globalization and Digitizatimn", German Journal of Urban Studies, 4/2 [Access: 10104/2003], http://www.difu.de/index. shtml? i publikationenl dfkl eniarchiv Iwelcome.shtml.
  52. LEFEBVRE, H. (1970), La Revolution Urbaine (Paris: Gallimard).
  53. MARIN, Mehmet C. (2004), "Elektronik Küresel Mekanlar, Tele-koloniler ve Türkiye'deki Kentler, " Uludağ Üniversitesi I. Ulusal Genç Bilim Adamlan Sempozyumu: Değişen Dünyada Türkiye'nin Önemi (Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Kültür ve Sanat Kurulu Yayınlan, No: 7, Cilt I): 251-275.
  54. MARIN, Mehmet C. (2003), "Dijital Kentte Endüstrinin Mekansal Seçimi ve iş ilişkilerine Yerleşim Kuramı Açısından Bir Bakış: Nike Inc. Örneği," II. Ulusal Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (istnabul: Kocaeli Üniversitesi iiBF ve BETA Basım Yayım Dağıtım AŞ): 735-748.
  55. MARIN, Mehmet C./ALTINTAS, Hakan (2003), "The Contribution of the Regional Development Ageney (SAPRDA) to Rural Governance in Southeastem Anatolia," Paper Presented at Annuol Conference of the European Group of Public Administrotion., The Third Meeting of the Study Group on Locol Governance within the European Group af Public Adminstrotion (Portugal) [Access: 09/02/2004], http://www.uwe.ac.uk/ bbs/sglg/mehm.doc.
  56. METCALFE, Jon (2001) "The European Urban Charter and its Implications for Urban Planning," TMMOB Şehir Plancılan Odası/OTDÜ Şehir ve BÖlge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancılan Odası): 139-143.
  57. MOSS, Mitchell (1999), Telecommunications Systems and Large World Cities: A Case Study of New York [Access: 18/03/2003] http://www.mitchellmoss.com/ books/worldcity.html.
  58. ORAL, Yıldınm/ECEMIŞ, Sibel (2001), "Türkiye de Metropoliten Planlamanın Kurumlaşmasında Avrupa Birliği Sürecinin Olası Etkileri," TMMOB Şehir Plancılan Odası IOTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama, (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası and OTDÜ Şehirve Bölge Planlama Bölümü): 157-168.
  59. POGGI, G. (1978), The Development of the Modern State: A Sociology Introduction (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
  60. RICHARDSON, Timl JENSEN, Ole B. (2000), "Discourses of Mobility and Polycentric DeVlelopment: A Contested View of European Spatial Planning," European Planning Studies (Volume 8, No 4): 503-520.
  61. SAWERS, Larry (1984), "New Perspectives on Urban Political Economy," TABB, William R. ISAWERS, Larry (eds.), Marixsm and the Metropolis: New Prespectives on Urban Political Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3-17.
  62. ŞENGÜL, Tarık (2001), Kentsel Çelişki ve Siyaset: Kapitalist Kentleşme Süreçleri Üzerine Yazılar (istanbul: Demokrasi Kitaplığı).
  63. ŞENER, Nedim (2003), "Yok Böyle Yağma," Milliyet, 8 Haziran 2003 [Access: 28/12/2004], http://www.milliyet.com/2003/06/08/ ekonomil aeko.html
  64. TEKEli, ilhan (2001), Modernite Aşılırken Kent Planlaması (Ankara: imge).
  65. TEKELi, ilhan (1984), "Ekonomik Bunalımın ve Bunalımdan Çıkmak için izlenen Politikaların Toplumsal Sonuçları," TEKELI, ilhan (ed.), Türkiye'de ve Dünya'da Yaşanan Ekonomik Bunalım (Ankara: Yurt Yayınları).
  66. TREANOR, Paul (2004), "Spatial Development Principles for the European Continent," [Access: 12/06/2004], http://web.inter.nl.netlusers/Paul. Treanor/europlan.extra.htmL.
  67. ÜNSAL, Fatma (2001), "Kentsel Planlamada Avrupa Birliği ile Uyumu Kolaylaştıracak Yenilikçi Araçlar," TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası and OTDÜ Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü (Eds.), Avrupa Birliği Süreci ve Planlama (Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası): 145- 154.
  68. ZIELONKA, Jan (2001), "How New Enlarged Borders Will Reshape the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, 39/3: 507-536.
  69. CAPORASO, J. A. (1996), "The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern," Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 11: 29-52.
  70. DUPUY,Alex (1998), "Thoughts on Globalization, Marxism and the Left," Latin American Perspectives, November 25: 55-60.