GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK

References (7)

1. ALGER, Chadwick (1963), “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 57/2.
2. ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), “Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx andWeber as Reflective Institutionalists,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies,19/2.
3. ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a FutureArcheologist of International Savoir Faire,” International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
4. AYDIN, Mustafa (2004), “Uluslararas× ĀliĂkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsam×, Kritiÿi,”Uluslararas×ĀliĂkiler, 1/1.
5. BANKS, Michael (1984), “The Evolution of International Relations Theory,” BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex:Wheatsheaf Books). BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), “National Support for Behavioral Science,” Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5. BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations, 6/1. BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), “Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations,” SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press). BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), “Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
6. BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
7. BULL, Hedley (1966), “International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach,” World Politics, 18/3.