SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

The Effect of Online Scenario Based Learning on English Writing Motivation and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of University Students

Çevrimiçi Uygulanan Senaryo Temelli Öğrenme Modelinin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin İngilizce Yazma Motivasyonuna ve Özyeterlik İnancına Etkisi

Burcu Karafil
Aytunga Oğuz
Pages
1009–1034
Publication Date
2024-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These promising results suggest the incorporation of online scenario-based writing activities in English writing instruction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to investigate the impact of online scenario-based English writing instruction on the motivation for English writing and self-efficacy beliefs among university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research, conducted as action research, involved a group of 14 students enrolled in the English preparatory program at a state university in the Marmara Region of Türkiye during the fall semester of the 2020-2021 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These promising results suggest the incorporation of online scenario-based writing activities in English writing instruction.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İngilizce Yazma Becerisi · Çevrimiçi Öğrenme · Senaryo Temelli Öğrenme

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the impact of online scenario-based English writing instruction on the motivation for English writing and self-efficacy beliefs among university students. The research, conducted as action research, involved a group of 14 students enrolled in the English preparatory program at a state university in the Marmara Region of Türkiye during the fall semester of the 2020-2021 academic year. Eight scenario activities were prepared as part of the online scenario-based English writing instruction. Action plans were developed to enhance students’ writing motivation and self-efficacy beliefs. The implementation of the prepared action plans consisted of four cycles and eight weeks. To collect data, the “English Writing Motivation Scale” and the “English Paragraph Writing Self-Efficacy Scale” were used. Dependent groups t-test was applied to compare the mean scores on the same sample group, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used when the data did not exhibit a normal distribution. Quantitative analysis revealed a significant increase in students’ intrinsic motivation to write in English following the online scenario-based English writing instruction. Additionally, it was observed that online scenario-based writing instruction enhanced students’ self-efficacy beliefs in writing in English. These promising results suggest the incorporation of online scenario-based writing activities in English writing instruction.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çevrimiçi senaryo temelli İngilizce yazma öğretiminin üniversite öğrencilerinin İngilizce yazmaya yönelik motivasyonlarına ve öz-yeterlik inançlarına etkisini araştırmaktır. Eylem araştırması olarak gerçekleştirilen araştırma, 2020-2021 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde Türkiye’nin Marmara Bölgesi’ndeki bir devlet üniversitesinin İngilizce hazırlık programına kayıtlı 14 öğrenciden oluşan bir grubu kapsamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında sekiz senaryo etkinliği hazırlanmıştır. Öğrencilerin İngilizce yazma özyeterlik inançlarını ve motivasyonlarını arttırmak amacıyla eylem planları hazırlanmıştır. Eylem planlarının uygulanması dört döngü ve sekiz haftadan oluşmuştur. Araştırma verileri “İngilizce Yazma Motivasyon Ölçeği” ve İngilizce Paragraf Yazma Öz-yeterlik İnancı Ölçeği” kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde verilerin normal dağılım gösterdiği durumlarda bağımlı gruplar t-testi kullanılırken, verilerin normal dağılım göstermediği durumlarda Wilcoxon işaretli sıra testi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen nicel bulgulara göre, öğrencilerin İngilizce yazma konusundaki içsel motivasyonları artmıştır. Ayrıca, çevrimiçi senaryo temelli yazma eğitiminin öğrencilerin İngilizce yazma konusundaki öz-yeterlik inançlarını artırdığı görülmüştür. Bu sonuçlara dayanarak, çevrimiçi senaryo temelli yazma etkinliklerinin İngilizce yazma öğretimine dahil edilmesi gerektiği açıktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karafil, B., Oğuz, A. (2024). The Effect of Online Scenario Based Learning on English Writing Motivation and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of University Students. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 1009–1034. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1417707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (97)

  1. Al-Attar, R. H. (2019). The effectiveness of using scenario-based learning strategy in developing EFL eleventh graders’ speaking and prospective thinking skills. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Education, Gaza.
  2. Al Mubarak, A. A. (2017). An investigation of academic writing problem level faced by undergraduate students at Al Imam Al Mahdi University-Sudan, English review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 175-188. Retrieved from https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE/article/view/533
  3. Ataman, O. (2017). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin ingilizce öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyon düzeyleri ve tutumları ile hazırlık sınıfı başarı puanları arasındaki ilişki (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  4. Bagherzadeh, H. and Azizi, Z. (2012). Learners’ beliefs about English language learning: Examining the impact of English proficiency level on the motivation of students among non-English major EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2096-2102. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.2096-2102
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  6. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed), In Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71-78), New York: Academic Press.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  8. Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Rushby, J. V., Bostwick, K. C. and Sheridan, L. (2021). The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers & Education, 169, 104194. Lhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194
  9. Bennett, R. E., Deane, P. and W. van Rijn, P. (2016). From cognitive-domain theory to assessment practice. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 82-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1141683
  10. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  11. Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C. and Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  13. Cahyono, B. Y. and Rahayu, T. (2020). EFL students’ motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. TEFLIN Journal, 31(2), 162-180. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f069/c871eb149c44c1d31aa6efdd8af123812bdd.pdf
  14. Chapel, W. B. and Victor, D. A. (1999). Using scenarios and vignettes in cross-cultural business communication instruction. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(4), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999906200415
  15. Chea, S. and Shumow, L. (2017). The relationships among writing self-efficacy, writing goal orientation, and writing achievement. Asian-Focused ELT Research and Practice: Voices from the Far Edge, 12(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/14/V5/I2/A07/Chea_Shumow
  16. Chenoweth, N. A. and Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004
  17. Çakır, İ. (2010). Yazma becerisinin kazanılması yabancı dil öğretiminde neden zordur? Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 28(1), 165-176. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/219533
  18. Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  19. Dehaan, J., Johnson, N. H., Yoshimura, N. and Kondo, T. (2012). Wiki and digital video use in strategic interaction-based experiential EFL learning. Calico Journal, 29(2), 249-268. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.29.2.249
  20. Demirel, Ö. (1999). İlköğretim okullarında yabancı dil öğretimi. İstanbul: M.E.B.
  21. Doğan, Ö. (2009). İngilizce hazırlık okuyan öğrencilerin motivasyon düzeyleri. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  22. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Ekiz, D. (2006). Eğitimde araştırma yöntem ve metotlarına giriş. nitel, nicel ve eleştirel kuram metodolojileri. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  24. Fazel, I. and Ahmadi, A. (2011). On the relationship between writing proficiency and instrumental/integrative motivation among Iranian IELTS candidates. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 747-757. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.7.747-757
  25. Ferrance, E. (2020). Action research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University, Providence. Retrieved from https://www.dsoergel.com/575/week02/UBLIS575DS-02.2$1-BrownUnivActionResearch.pdf
  26. Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
  27. Graham, S., Camping, A., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A. A., Wilson, J. M., Wdowin, J. and Ng, C. (2021). Writing and writing motivation of students identified as English language learners. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.01.01
  28. Gravetter, J. F. and Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). USA: Linda Schreiber-Ganste.
  29. Gömleksiz, M. N. (2001). The effects of age and motivation factors on second language acquisition. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 11(2), 217-224. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8bba948ec5d80925f7ab59e5abb5e3d74a1f424f
  30. Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
  31. Hidi, S. and Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing (chapter 10). C. Macarthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). In Handbook of writing research (pp. 144-157). New York: Guilford.
  32. Hwang, W. Y., Chen, H. S., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y. M. and Chen, C. Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733711
  33. İnal, S. (2006). İngilize yazılı anlatım dersinin sorunları üzerine bir inceleme. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 180-203. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/104668
  34. Jackson, R. (1993). Using strategic interaction in the teaching of writing. James A, (Ed.). In strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 109-115). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  35. Javadi-Safa, A. (2018). A brief overview of key issues in second language writing teaching and research. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 12-25. Retrieved from https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/4404/3444
  36. Johnson, A. P. (2012). A short guide to action research (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  37. Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques, Ankara: Asil Publications.
  38. Kartawijaya, S. (2018). Improving students’ writing skill in writing paragraph through an outline technique. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 152-158. http://doi.org/10.22216/jcc.2018.v3i3.3429
  39. Karafil, B. (2022). Çevrimiçi uygulanan senaryo temelli öğrenme modelinin üniversite öğrencilerinin ingilizce yazma becerisine, yazma motivasyonuna ve öz yeterlik inancına etkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon.
  40. Karafil, B. and Oğuz, A. (2022). Development of English paragraph writing self-efficacy belief scale. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 105-120. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.8
  41. Karasu, A. (2019). The effect of scenario-based learning-teaching approach on 7th grade students’ attitudes towards English lesson and their views and concerns about learning English (Unpublished master thesis). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
  42. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, (Eds.), In Handbook of qualitative research (pp.559-603), London: Sage.
  43. Köklü, N. (1993). Action research. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 26(2), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000478
  44. Kucer, S. M. (2005). Dimensions of literacy- A conceptual for teaching reading and writing in school settings (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  45. Kuluşaklı, E. (2021). An investigation into Turkish EFL learners’ academic writing motivation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 165-178. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1299637.pdf
  46. Kyllonen, P. C., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J. and Roberts, R. D. (2014). Personality, motivation, and college readiness: a prospectus for assessment and development. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12004
  47. Laeli, A. N. (2019). Students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in learning english writing at senior high school. (Unpublished Final Project). English Department, Universitt of Negeri Semarang.
  48. Lamine, B. (2011). The role of scenario-based instruction in enhancing students of business English motivation (Unpublished Master Thesis). Mentouri University of Constantine, Algeria.
  49. Li, M. and Storch, N. (2017). Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.012
  50. Linuwih, E.R. and Winardi, Y. K. (2020). Improving students’ writing skill using a mobile learning application. Jurnal Basis, 7(2), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v7i2.2433
  51. Lo, J. and Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: the case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.002 MacArthur, C. A. and Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. C. A. MacArthur, A. Graham, J. Fitzgerald, (Eds), In Handbook of writing research (pp.24-40), New York: The Guilford Press.
  52. Mehall, S. (2021). Comparing in-class scenario-based learning to scenario-based e-learning through an interactive, self-paced case study. Journal of Education for Business, 97(5), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1943294
  53. Melikhova, I. and Skorobogatova, A. (2020). Foreign language writing in the context of modern language education in non-linguistic majors. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13211a
  54. McCarthy, P., Meier, S. and Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 465-471. https://doi.org/10.2307/357865
  55. Mili, A. (2020). The role of learners’ motivation in english language learning at the tertiary level in Bangladesh. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/27e9m
  56. Moses, R. N. and Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL contexts: A literature review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385-3391. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013260
  57. Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: the writing process and error analysis in student texts. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 6(2), 1-20. Retrieved from: http://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume6/ej22/ej22a1/?wscr
  58. Nagao, A. (2018). A genre-based approach to writing instruction in EFL classroom contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 130-147. doi: 10.5539/elt.v11n5p130
  59. Nguyen, H. C. (2019). Motivation in learning English language: a case study at Vietnam national university, Hanoi. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 49-65. doi:10.19044/ejes.v6no1a4.
  60. Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R. and Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111
  61. Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: learners’ orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. Language Learning, 51(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00149
  62. Norton, G., Taylor, M., Stewart, T., Blackburn, G., Jinks, A., Razdar, B., ... and Marastoni, E. (2012). Designing, developing and implementing a software tool for scenario based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.790
  63. Nunan, D. (1998). Teaching grammar in context. ELT Journal, 52(2), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.2.101
  64. Nyasimi, N. A. B. (2015). Challenges students face in learning essay writing skills in English language in secondary schools in Manga district (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya.
  65. Ouahidi, M. (2020). On the relationship between writing motivation, academic achievement, and gender in tertiary education. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 685-692. Retrived from: https://ijels.com/upload_document/issue_files/20IJELS-105202027-Onthe.pdf
  66. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  67. Pajares, F. and Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self‐efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199604)33:2 3.0.CO;2-C
  68. Pajares, F. and Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0995
  69. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: a review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
  70. Pernice, R. (2003). Writing-in-role: Helping students explore emotional dimensions. E. Errington, (Ed.). In Developing scenario-based learning: Practical insights for tertiary educators (pp. 145-153). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
  71. Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5. doi: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
  72. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  73. Sabti, A. A., Md Rashid, S., Nimehchisalem, V. and Darmi, R. (2019). The impact of writing anxiety, writing achievement motivation, and writing self-efficacy on writing performance: A correlational study of Iraqi tertiary EFL learners. SAGE Open, 9(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019894289
  74. Saravanan, A., Palanisamy, L., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Systematic review: challenges in teaching writing skills for upper secondary in ESL classrooms and suggestions to overcome them. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(4), 262-275. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i4.749
  75. Schneider, B. and Andre, J. A. (2005). University preparation for workplace writing: an exploratory study of the perceptions of students in three disciplines. The Journal of Business Communication 42(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605274749
  76. Schunk, D. H. and DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. K. R. Wentzel, D. B. Mielei (Eds.). In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 34-55). Routledge.
  77. Shaikholeslami, R. and Khayyer, M. (2006). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and learning English as a foreign language. Psychological Reports, 99(3), 813-818. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.99.3.813-818
  78. Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C. and Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.91
  79. Siddiqui, A., Khan, M. and Akhtar, S. (2008). Supply chain simulator: a scenario-based educational tool to enhance student learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.008
  80. Smart, K. L., Hicks, N. and Melton, J. (2013). Using problem-based scenarios to teach writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912466256
  81. Suastra, I. and Menggo, S. (2020). Empowering students’ writing skill through performance assessment. International Journal of Language Education, 4(3), 432-441. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i3.15060
  82. Sun, T. and Wang, C. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 1−17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221
  83. Surastinai and Dedi, F. S. O. (2018). Examining academic writing motivation of prospective Indonesian language teachers using exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1122a
  84. Tambunan, H., Dalimunte, A. and Silitonga, M. (2017). Scenario based e-learning in electrical engineering education. International Education Studies, 10(3), 26–34. doi:10.5539/ies.v10n3p26
  85. Tsao, J. J. (2021). Effects of EFL learners’ L2 writing self-efficacy on engagement with written corrective feedback. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9
  86. Woodward‐Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: writing support for non‐english speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701494286
  87. Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
  88. Vallerand, R. J. and Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: a prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
  89. Mio, C., Ventura‐Medina, E. and João, E. (2019). Scenario‐based eLearning to promote active learning in large cohorts: Students’ perspective. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(4), 894-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22123
  90. Yeşilyurt, S. (2008). Motivational patterns and achievement in EFL writing courses: an investigation from self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education (KKEFD), 18, 135-154. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/31392
  91. Yuan-bing, D. (2011). How to motivate students in second language writing. Sino-US English Teaching, 8(4), 235-240. Retrieved from https://anyflip.com/przb/dcdi/basic
  92. Yulianti, N. (2014). Improving the writing skills through diary writing of the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Ngemplak. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Yogyakarta State University., Yogyakarta.
  93. Zhang, Y. and Guo, H. (2012). A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 101-121. Retrieved from http://web.a.ebscohost.com
  94. Zhang, M., van Rijn, P. W., Deane, P. and Bennett, R. E. (2019). Scenario-based assessments in writing: an experimental study. Educational Assessment, 24(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2018.1557515
  95. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002 Zimmerman, B. J. and Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831203100484
  96. Zimmerman, B. J. and Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: a social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
  97. Zimmerman, B. and Kitsantas, A. (2007). Reliability and validity of self-efficacy for learning form (self) scores of college students. Journal of Psychology, 215(3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.215.3.15