SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1

The Role of Optimism and Innovativeness on Consumers' Intention to Use Smart Robot Vacuum Cleaners

Tüketicilerin Akıllı Robot Süpürgeleri Kullanma Niyeti Üzerinde İyimserlik ve Yenilikçiliğin Rolü

Fatih Bilici
Pages
243–270
Publication Date
2025-03-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results show that psychological factors and demographic characteristics are important in technology adoption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of optimism and innovativeness on consumers' future intention to use smart robot vacuum cleaners.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analyses using structural equation modelling with Smart PLS software reveal that optimism and innovativeness significantly and positively affect consumers' intention to use robot vacuum cleaner technology in the future.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results show that psychological factors and demographic characteristics are important in technology adoption.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İyimserlik · Yenilikçilik · Akıllı Robot Süpürge

Abstract

This study examines the effects of optimism and innovativeness on consumers' future intention to use smart robot vacuum cleaners. Analyses using structural equation modelling with Smart PLS software reveal that optimism and innovativeness significantly and positively affect consumers' intention to use robot vacuum cleaner technology in the future. In addition, due to the multiple group analysis conducted in the Smart PLS programme, optimism stands out as an important factor shaping the intention to use smart robot vacuum cleaners in the future, especially among young individuals. In addition, it was determined that there was a stronger relationship between optimism and future usage intention in participants aged 34 years and younger than those aged 35 years and older. There are also gender-based differences in the innovativeness dimension. While innovativeness has a positive effect on women, it has a negative effect on men. Finally, it was determined that the marital status variable did not lead to any change in the model. These results show that psychological factors and demographic characteristics are important in technology adoption. The study results reveal that marketing strategies should focus on optimism and innovation. Marketing messages reinforcing positive attitudes towards young consumers and encouraging innovation are essential for businesses. According to the study, emphasising innovative features to attract female consumers in the marketing efforts of smart home assistants will move marketing efforts forward. Focusing on a specific geographical area, only two dimensions of the technological readiness index, the smart robot vacuum cleaner product, and time constraints constitute the limitations of the research.

Özet

Bu çalışma, tüketicilerin akıllı robot süpürgeleri gelecekte kullanma niyeti üzerinde iyimserlik ve yenilikçiliğin etkilerini incelemektedir. Smart PLS programı ile yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak yapılan analizler, iyimserlik ve yenilikçiliğin tüketicilerin robot süpürge teknolojisini gelecekte kullanma niyetlerini anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca Smart PLS programında yapılan çoklu grup analizi sonucunda iyimserlik, özellikle genç bireyler arasında akıllı robot süpürgeleri gelecekte kullanma niyetini şekillendiren önemli bir faktör olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Ek olarak 34 yaş ve altı katılımcılarda, 35 yaş ve üzerindekilere göre iyimserlik ile gelecekte kullanım niyeti arasında daha güçlü bir ilişki bulunduğu belirlenmiştir. Yenilikçilik boyutunda da cinsiyet bazında farklılıklar bulunmaktadır. Yenilikçilik, kadınlar için olumlu bir etki yaratırken, erkekler için küçük de olsa olumsuz bir etki ortaya çıkartmaktadır. Son olarak medeni durum değişkeninin model üzerinde herhangi bir değişikliğe yol açmadığı belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada ortaya çıkan bu sonuçlar, teknoloji benimseme süreçlerinde psikolojik faktörlerin ve demografik özelliklerin önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, pazarlama stratejilerinin iyimserlik ve yenilikçilik boyutlarına odaklanarak şekillendirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya çıkartmaktadır. Genç tüketicilere yönelik olumlu tutumları güçlendiren ve yenilikçiliği teşvik eden pazarlama iletişimi mesajları işletmeler açısından önem arz etmektedir. Çalışmaya göre akıllı ev yardımcılarının pazarlama çabalarında kadın tüketicilerin ilgisini çekmek için yenilikçi özelliklere vurgu yapılması pazarlama çabalarını ileriye taşıyacaktır. Belirli bir coğrafi alana, teknolojik hazır olma indeksinin sadece iki boyutuna, akıllı robot süpürge ürününe odaklanılması ve zaman kısıtları araştırmanın sınırlılıklarını oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilici, F. (2025). The Role of Optimism and Innovativeness on Consumers' Intention to Use Smart Robot Vacuum Cleaners. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 243–270. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1567807

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (106)

  1. Alamanda, D., Wibowo, L., Munawar, S. ve Nisa, A. (2021). The interest of technology adoption in e-commerce mobile apps using modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 6(3), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i3.1327
  2. Alharbi, A. ve Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology readiness and cryptocurrency adoption: pls-sem and deep learning neural network analysis. Ieee Access, 9, 21388-21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3055785
  3. Alizadehfanaeloo, P. (2022). The impact of brand involvement, attitude and loyalty on brand usage intent: the moderator role of openness to innovations personality trait of consumers (online food and beverage platforms example). Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(3), 1262-1281. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1153393
  4. Álvarez‐Marín, A., Velázquez‐Iturbide, J. ve Castillo-Vergara, M. (2021). Technology acceptance of an interactive augmented reality app on resistive circuits for engineering students. Electronics, 10(11), 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111286
  5. Aydemir, M. F. (2024). Dijital doğanların uluslararasılaşması: Kavramsal bir çerçeve. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 26(46), 18-37.
  6. Bacca-Acosta, J. (2023). The impact of digital technologies on business competitiveness: a comparison between latin america and europe. Competitiveness Review an International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 33(7), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-10-2022-0167
  7. Bai, Y. W. ve Hsueh, M. F. (2012, October). Using an adaptive iterative learning algorithm for planning of the path of an autonomous robotic vacuum cleaner. In The 1st IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics 2012 (pp. 401-405). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/gcce.2012.6379640
  8. Bakırtaş, H. ve Akkaş, C. (2020). Technology readiness and technology acceptance of academic staffs. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.853629
  9. Bchini, B. (2024). Relational social capital and women entrepreneurs’ performance: the role of women entrepreneurs' satisfaction and innovation mindset. Global Journal of Sociology Current Issues, 14(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v14i1.9352
  10. Bellis, E., Johar, G. ve Poletti, N. (2023). Meaning of manual labor impedes consumer adoption of autonomous products. Journal of Marketing, 87(6), 949-965. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231171841
  11. Bilici F. ve Özdemir E. (2024). Tüketicilerin artırılmış gerçeklik teknolojilerini kullanma niyeti üzerinde teknolojik hazır bulunuşluluğun rolü. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal (SMART JOURNAL), 6(37), 2046-2060.
  12. Bilici, F. (2024). Tüketicilerin doğal bal algısı ve satınalma davranışlarını etkileyen faktörler üzerine bir araştırma. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 24(1), 93-125.
  13. Bilici, F. ve İnam, S. Tüketicilerin akıllı robot süpürgelere yönelik tutum ve robot süpürgeleri kullanma niyeti üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 20(3), 552-586.
  14. Bono, E., Sala, E. ve Hancock, R. (2009). Older carers in the U.K.: Are there really gender differences? New analysis of the individual sample of anonymised records from the 2001 U.K. census. Health & Social Care in the Community, 17(3), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00826.x
  15. Buabeng-Andoh, C. ve Baah, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers' intention to use learning management system: an integration of utaut and tam. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-02-2020-0028
  16. Cepeda‐Carrión, G., Cegarra‐Navarro, J. ve Cillo, V. (2019). Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (pls-sem) in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2018-0322
  17. Chanak, P., Banerjee, I., Wang, J. ve Sherratt, R. (2014). Obstacle avoidance routing scheme through optimal sink movement for home monitoring and mobile robotic consumer devices. Ieee Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 60(4), 596-604. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2014.7027292
  18. Chung, N., Han, H. ve Joun, Y. (2015). Tourists' intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (A.R.) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 588-599.
  19. Croft, L., Sorkin, J. Ve Gallicchio, L. (2014). Marital status and optimism score among breast cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(11), 3027-3034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2308-y
  20. Dutta, A. (2017). Innovation in microenterprises: case of women entrepreneurs in the kingdom of bahrain. Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting and Auditing an International Journal, 04(01), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.12785/jeraa/040104
  21. Dzin, N. H. ve Lay, Y. F. (2021). Validity and reliability of adapted self-efficacy scales in Malaysian context using PLS-SEM approach. Education Sciences, 11(11), 676.
  22. Eren, A. ve Doğan, H. (2022). Design and implementation of a cost-effective vacuum cleaner robot. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 6(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.830282
  23. Esen, F.S. (2020). Dijital bankacılık kullanımına teknoloji kabulüne dayalı bir yaklaşım. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(4), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.664854
  24. Esquiva, I., Perales, J. ve Espejo, B. (2018). Measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale by gender, age, marital status and educational level. Quality of Life Research, 28(4), 963-968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2066-2
  25. Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D. ve Rogers, W. A. (2009). Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments: 5th International Conference, UAHCI 2009, Held as Part of HCI International 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19-24, 2009. Proceedings, Part II 5 (pp. 39-48). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5
  26. Frennert, S. ve Östlund, B. (2014). The domestication of robotic vacuum cleaners among seniors. Gerontechnology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2014.12.3.004.00
  27. Garg, N. (2023). Validation of the transpersonal gratitude scale (tgs) and the relationship between transpersonal gratitude, spiritual well-being and distress in India. Journal of Religion and Health, 62(5), 3604–3621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01811-w
  28. Giri, L., Qureshi, A.R., Chethan, B.K., Parveen J.F. ve Neha M.S. (2023). Smart vaccum cleaner using bluetooth module. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.56726/irjmets42722
  29. Golubović-Corcione, S. (2024). The impact of knowledge management on corporate sustainable development (CSD): the mediating role of green innovation. https://doi.org/10.5937/imcsm24017g
  30. Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., ve Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (pls-sem) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M. ve Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of pls-sem. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
  31. Hariyanto, V., Daryono, R., Hidayat, N., Prayitno, S. ve Nurtanto, M. (2022). A framework for measuring the level of achievement of vocational students competency of architecture education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1188
  32. Hasina, Z. ve Bernawati, Y. (2021). Gender on board and the impact to firm performance through innovation as mediating variable: evidence from indonesian non-financial firms. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v25i2.5462
  33. Hati, S. ve Idris, A. (2014). Antecedents of customers' intention to support Islamic social enterprises in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(5), 707-737. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-08-2014-0126
  34. He, Q., ve Sun, Y. (2020). An optimized cleaning robot path generation and execution system using cellular representation of workspace. In 10th International Conference on Advances in Computing and Information Technology (ACITY 2020) (pp. 13-25). https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2020.101502
  35. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. ve Ray, P. (2016). Using pls path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382
  36. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. ve Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  37. Herdiansya, H. (2023). Design prototype robot vacuum cleaner based on arduino microcontroller with autonomic mode. Tin Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 4(3), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.47065/tin.v4i3.4215
  38. Hidayatullah, D. (2024). Desain prototype robot vacuum cleaner otomatis berbasis arduino uno. Komets, 2(1), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.58291/komets.v2i1.159
  39. Hou, J., Yao, Y., Hameed, J., Kamran, H. W., Nawaz, M. A., Aqdas, R., ve Patwary, A. K. (2021). The role of artificial and nonartificial intelligence in the new product success with moderating role of new product innovation: a case of manufacturing companies in China. Complexity, 2021(1), 8891298.1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8891298
  40. Huang, I. C., Wu, H. C., Lin, C. L. ve Wang, H. H. (2023, April). Development and Validation of the Osteoporosis Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviors Questionnaire for Female Osteoporosis Patients in Taiwan: A Mediation Model. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 7, p. 1023). MDPI.
  41. Huang, Q. (2022). Weight-quantized squeezenet for resource-constrained robot vacuums for indoor obstacle classification. A.I., 3(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai3010011
  42. Huang, Q. (2023). Towards indoor suctionable object classification and recycling: developing a lightweight ai model for robot vacuum cleaners. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10031. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810031
  43. Huang, Q. and Tang, Z. (2023). High-performance and lightweight ai model for robot vacuum cleaners with low bitwidth strong non-uniform quantization. AI, 4(3), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4030029
  44. Hussin, M. (2024). Smart robot cleaner using internet of things. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 46(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.46.1.175186
  45. Ibrahim, A., Borhan, M., Osman, M., Badri, K., ve Zakaria, N. (2022). An empirical study of passengers' perceived satisfaction with monorail service quality: the case of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(11), 6496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116496
  46. Ibrahim, A., Borhan, M., ve Yunin, N. (2020). Getting young drivers to buckle up: Exploring the factors influencing seat belt use by young drivers in Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010162
  47. Iftikhar, M., Qureshi, M. I., Qayyum, S., Fatima, I., Sriyanto, S., Indrianti, Y. ve Dana, L. P. (2021). Impact of multifaceted workplace bullying on the relationships between technology usage, organisational climate and employee physical and emotional health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(6), 3207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063207
  48. Jakimovski, S. ve Gelev, S. (2023). Autonomous robotic vacuum cleaner. ETIMA, 2(1), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.46763/etima2321190j
  49. Jeong, J. ve Roh, T. (2017). The intention of using wearable devices: based on modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2017.15.4.205
  50. Jote, G. (2023). Financial innovation and its effects on bank financial performance: evidence from Ethiopian commercial banks. AJOCS, 3(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v3.i1.3
  51. Kang, M., Kim, K., Noh, D., Han, J., ve Ko, S. (2014). A robust obstacle detection method for robotic vacuum cleaners. Ieee Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 60(4), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.1109/tce.2014.7027291
  52. Kaya, A., Koca, N., ve Hatunoğlu, Z. (2022). Geleceğin muhasebecilerinin teknoloji kabullerinin tespitine i̇lişkin bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 25(Özel Sayı), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1141389
  53. Kim, J. ve Kang, E. (2023). An empirical research: incorporation of user innovativeness into tam and utaut in adopting a golf app. Sustainability, 15(10), 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108309
  54. Kim, K. ve Shin, D. (2015). An acceptance model for smartwatches. Internet Research, 25(4), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2014-0126
  55. Kock, N. ve Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in pls‐sem: the inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
  56. Kumar, T. P., Basavaraj, S. ve Soundarapandiyan, K. (2024). Can co‐creating in CSR initiatives influence loyal customers? Evidence from the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2561
  57. Kundu, A., Gorai, J. ve Angadi, G. (2023). The development and validation of a tool measuring administrators' attitudes towards the apprenticeship-embedded degree program. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(3), 706-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-02-2023-0065
  58. Lai, X., Hai-shun, W. ve Liu, H. (2011). Research on duct flow field optimisation of a robot vacuum cleaner. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 8(5), 65. https://doi.org/10.5772/50903
  59. Lee, B. Ve Yang-Eun, K. (2021). Factor structure and validation of the 12-item Korean version of the general health questionnaire in a sample of early childhood teachers. Education Sciences, 11(5), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050243
  60. Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2015.1005806
  61. Lenggogeni, S. (2019). Why is the partial least square important for tourism studies? International Journal of Tourism Heritage and Recreation Sport, 1(2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijthrs.v1i2.27
  62. Levay, K., Freese, J. ve Druckman, J. (2016). The demographic and political composition of mechanical turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1), 215824401663643. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016636433
  63. Lin, H., Lee, M., Liang, J., Chang, H., Huang, P. Ve Tsai, C. (2019). A review of using partial least square structural equation modeling in e‐learning research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1354-1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12890
  64. Lipovka, A., Islamgaleyev, A. ve Badjanova, J. (2021). Innovation capability of women and men managers: evidence from Kazakhstan. Access Access to Science Business Innovation in Digital Economy, 2(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2021.2.1(7)
  65. Lobo, J., Bernardo, B., Buan, E., Duane, R., Grace, A., Alfonso, X. ve Joven, M. (2022). The role of motivation to dance engagement and psychological well-being. American Journal of Youth and Women Empowerment, 1(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajywe.v1i1.835
  66. Lupetti, M. L., Rosa, S., ve Ermacora, G. (2015, March). From a Robotic Vacuum Cleaner to Robot Companion: Acceptance and Engagement in Domestic Environments. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (pp. 119-120). https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702004
  67. Mac T.T. ve Hung N.T. (2020). The development of mapping, covering and control strategies for a vacuum cleaner robot. JST Smart Systems and Devices, 31(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.51316/jst.150.ssad.2021.31.1.8
  68. Mishra, A., Maheswarappa, S. ve Colby, C. (2018). Technology readiness of teenagers: a consumer socialization perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(5), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-07-2017-0262
  69. Munarsih, E. ve Rikmasari, Y. (2021, September). The Analysis of E-Prescribing System Acceptance in Hospitals Using SEM-PLS. In Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311783
  70. Nadaf, S. (2023). Cleanzo: vacuum cleaner with obstacle detection using bluetooth. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(5), 5119-5124. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.52817
  71. Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (pls-sem) in management accounting research: directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.09.003
  72. Oh, H. (2016). Innovativeness or confidence? The effect of consumer innovativeness and self-efficacy on the acceptance and diffusion of innovative technology. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 10(8), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijseia.2016.10.8.11
  73. Othman, N. ve Sudarmin, S. (2022). Understanding the moderating effect of marital status in explaining the relationship between perceived behavioural control and intention to use online shopping. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i12/15949
  74. Özdemir, E. ve Sönmezay, M. (2020). Bütüncül perakendeci̇li̇kte tüketi̇ci̇leri̇n davranişsal ni̇yeti̇ üzeri̇nde teknoloji̇ kabul ve kullanimini etki̇leyen faktörler. Business Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(5), 3936-3970. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i5.1596
  75. Özdemir, E., Kılıç, S. ve Çakırer, M. A. (2019). Satış promosyonları ve kredi kartı kullanımının tüketicilerin plansız satın alma ve satın alma sonrası pişmanlık davranışı üzerindeki etkileri. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(4), 2528-2545.
  76. Öztürk, F. ve Özel, N. (2021). Yapay zekâ ve kütüphaneler. Bilgi Dünyası, 22(2), 351-386. https://doi.org/10.15612/bd.2021.648
  77. Panahi, S. (2023). Development and validation of a modified libqual scale in health sciences libraries: application of structural equation modeling. Journal of the Medical Library Association Jmla, 111(4), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1348
  78. Pepin, J. (2022). A visualization of U.S. couples' money arrangements. Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 8, 237802312211387. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221138719
  79. Raj, L., Amilan, S., Aparna, K. ve Swaminathan, K. (2023). Factors influencing the adoption of cashless transactions during covid-19: an extension of enhanced utaut with pandemic precautionary measures. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(2), 488-507. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00218-8
  80. Rese, A., Schreiber, S. ve Baier, D. (2014). Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 869-876.
  81. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. ve Becker, J.-M. 2022. SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com.
  82. Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., ve Gudergan, S. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in hrm research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617-1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
  83. Ritter-Hayashi, D., Vermeulen, P. ve Knoben, J. (2019). Is this a man’s world? the effect of gender diversity and gender equality on firm innovativeness. Plos One, 14(9), e0222443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222443
  84. Ruiz‐Palomo, D., Fernández-Gámez, M. ve León-Gómez, A. (2022). Analyzing the effect of financial constraints on technological and management innovation in smes: a gender perspective. Sage Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079925
  85. Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Peñarroja, V. ve Enache-Zegheru, M. (2022). Validation of the Spanish version of the technostress creators scale in Chilean workers. Anales De Psicología, 38(3), 518-529. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.509551
  86. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. ve Howard, M. (2020). Beyond a tandem analysis of sem and process: use of pls-sem for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 288-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686
  87. Savalei, V. (2019). A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000181
  88. Schlaegel, C. ve Sarstedt, M. (2016). Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: a composite model approach. European Management Journal, 34(6), 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.002
  89. Seren, N., ve Altıntaş, M. H. (2023). Üretim işletmelerinin ar-ge harcamalarının yıllık bazdaki hız temelinde çok boyutlu ölçekleme yöntemiyle analizi. The Journal of Accounting and Finance (100), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1349307
  90. Shah, T. (2023). Linking technology readiness and customer engagement: an ai-enabled voice assistants investigation. Foresight, 26(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/fs-10-2021-0195
  91. Shiau, W., Sarstedt, M. ve Hair, J. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem). Internet Research, 29(3), 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2018-0447
  92. Siahaan, A. ve Thiodore, J. (2022, January). Analysis Influence of Consumer Behavior to Purchase Organic Foods in Jakarta. In 6th International Conference of Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resource (IC-FANRES 2021) (pp. 57-65). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.220101.009
  93. Slade, E., Dwivedi, Y., Piercy, N. Ve Williams, M. (2015). Modeling consumers' adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology and Marketing, 32(8), 860–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823
  94. Smith, J. (2023). Robotic assistants in everyday life: a comprehensive overview and future prospects. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/n7hu3
  95. Snehvrat, S., Chaudhary, S. ve Majhi, S. G. (2022). Ambidexterity and absorptive capacity in boundary-spanning managers: role of paradox mindset and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 60(12), 3209-3231. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2021-0328
  96. Soelasih, Y. ve Sumani, S. (2021). Customer loyalty: the difference between full-service carriers and low-cost carriers in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 12(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v12i1.6489
  97. Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M. ve Mazzara, M. (2020). A pls-sem neural network approach for understanding cryptocurrency adoption. Ieee Access, 8, 13138-13150. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2960083
  98. Sonnenschein, S., Stites, M. ve Ross, A. (2021). Home learning environments for young children in the U.S. during COVID-19. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 794-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.1943282
  99. Teslya, N. ve Savosin, S. (2014, October). Smart-M3-based robot interaction in cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of 16th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT (pp. 108-114). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/fruct.2014.7000936
  100. Tor-Kadıoğlu, C. (2020). Tüketicilerin Akıllı Robot Süpürge Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(4), 2515-2537. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.20.11.1450
  101. Vaussard, F., Fink, J., Bauwens, V., Rétornaz, P., Hamel, D., Dillenbourg, P. ve Mondada, F. (2014). Lessons learned from robotic vacuum cleaners entering the home ecosystem. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 62(3), 376-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.09.014
  102. Wicaksari, P. (2024). The influence of green quality of work life, green employee engagement, and green rewards on green employee retention in sme employees. Small Business International Review, 8(1), e627. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v8i1.627
  103. Wundavalli, L., Hussain, M., Gupta, A. ve Arya, S. (2022). Psychometric analysis and construct validation of health professional education in patient safety survey in the Indian context. The National Medical Journal of India, pp. 34, 266–270. https://doi.org/10.25259/nmji_287_19
  104. Yakar, U. (2022, Mart 17). Siz Kılınızı Kıpırdatmadan Evinizi Tertemiz Yapacak En İyi Robot Süpürge Tavsiyeleri. Webtekno. https://www.webtekno.com/en-iyi-robot-supurge-tavsiyeleri-h121717.html
  105. Yang, H., Lee, H. ve Zo, H. (2017). User acceptance of smart home services: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(1), 68-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-01-2016-0017
  106. Yuan, K. and Fang, Y. (2022). Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 76(3), 646-678. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12293