Journals / Bağımlılık Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Adaptation of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale to Turkish: A Reliability and Factor Analysis Study

Lübnan Nargile Bağımlılığı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Güvenilirlik ve Faktör Analizi Çalışması

Pages
163–180
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The outcome of this study has suggested a reliable Turkish assessment tool with validity regarding waterpipe dependence in a Turkish sample.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to adapt The Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale (LWDS-11) to Turkish in order to facilitate research regarding waterpipe dependence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The LWDS-11 has been constructed and validated as a need for a standardized measure that incorporates not only the assessment of physiological dependence on nicotine but embodies psychosocial factors as well.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The outcome of this study has suggested a reliable Turkish assessment tool with validity regarding waterpipe dependence in a Turkish sample.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:waterpipe tobacco smoking · waterpipe · nicotine

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt The Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale (LWDS-11) to Turkish in order to facilitate research regarding waterpipe dependence. The LWDS-11 has been constructed and validated as a need for a standardized measure that incorporates not only the assessment of physiological dependence on nicotine but embodies psychosocial factors as well. Method: A sample of N=401 participants responded to the LWDS-11, the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence scale (FTND), and additional socio-demographic related items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been conducted and outcomes were compared with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Assessment of construct and criterion validity was done by the results of the CFA and correlations between the LWDS and the FTND. Results: The sample consisted of N=288 males and N=113 females between the ages 18 and 62.. Computed internal consistency provided a Cronbach’s alpha of .80. Two factors explaining 59% of variance were computed. Conclusion: The outcome of this study has suggested a reliable Turkish assessment tool with validity regarding waterpipe dependence in a Turkish sample.

Özet

Amaç:Bu araştırma, nargile bağımlılığı konusunu araştırmayı kolaylaştırmak için Lübnan Nargile Bağımlılığı Ölçeğini (LWDS-11) Türkçe'ye uyarlama amacıyla yapılmıştır. Lübnan Nargile Bağımlılığı Ölçeği sadece nikotine fizyolojik bağımlılığın değerlendirilmesini değil, aynı zamanda psikososyal faktörleri de kapsayan standart ölçüm aracına ihtiyaç kapsamında geliştirilmiş ve geçerli kılınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKCA, A. Y. E., TEPEDELEN, M. S., ALKAR, Ö. Y. (2020). Adaptation of the Lebanon Waterpipe Dependence Scale to Turkish: A Reliability and Factor Analysis Study. Bağımlılık Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 163–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/106557

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Global Report On Trends In Prevalence Of Tobacco Smoking Geneva: WHO, 2015
  2. Maziak W, Ward KD, Soweid RA, Eissenberg T. Tobacco smoking using a waterpipe: a re-emerging strain in a global epidemic. Tob Control 2004; 13 (4): 327-333
  3. Sezer RE, Picak YK. A new threat to tobacco control: aromatic narghile. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 2011; 33: 133-143. 4
  4. Subasi N, Bilir N, Ilhan E, et al. Knowledge, attitude and behaviors of narghile smokers on narghile smoking. Toraks Dergisi 2005; 6(2): 137-143
  5. The Ministry of Health of Turkey. (2014). Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2012 (online). Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2014
  6. Maziak W, Taleb ZB, Bahelah R, et al. The global epidemiology of waterpipe smoking. Tob Control 2014; 24(Suppl 1): I3-I12
  7. World Health Organization. TobReg Advisory Note: Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Health Effects, Research Needs and Recommended Actions by Regulators, 2nd edition. Geneva: WHO, 2015
  8. Akl EA, Jawad M, Lam WY, et al. Motives, beliefs and attitudes towards waterpipe tobacco smoking: a systematic review. Harm Reduct Journal 2013; 10: 12
  9. Akl EA, Ward KD, Bteddini D, et al. The allure of the waterpipe: a narrative review of factors affecting the epidemic rise in waterpipe smoking among young persons globally. Tob Control 2015; 24 (Suppl 1): I13-I21
  10. Erbaydar NP, Bilir N, Yildiz AN. Knowledge, behaviors and health hazard perception among Turkish narghile (waterpipe)-smokers related to narghile smoking. Pak J Med Sci 2010; 26(1): 195-200
  11. Hadidi KA, Mohammed FI. Nicotine content in tobacco used in hubble-bubble smoking. Saudi Med J 2004; 25(7): 912-917
  12. Shihadeh A. Investigation of mainstream smoke aerosol of the argileh water pipe. Food Chem Toxicol 2003; 41(1): 143-152
  13. Shihadeh A, Saleh R. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, “tar”, and nicotine in the mainstream smoke aerosol of the narghile water pipe. Food Chem Toxicol 2005; 43(5): 655-661
  14. Alvur MT, Cinar N, Akduran F, Dede C. Fallacies about water pipe use in Turkish university students - what might be the consequences? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15(5): 1977-1980
  15. Maziak W. The waterpipe: time for action. Addiction 2008; 103(11): 1763-1767
  16. Aboaziza E, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: what is the evidence that it supports nicotine/tobacco dependence? Tob Control 2015; 24(Suppl 1): i44-i53
  17. Maziak W, Taleb, ZB, Jawad M, et al. Consensus statement on assessment of waterpipe