SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Adaptation of the Multidimensional Neglectful Behavior Scale into Turkish and Examination of its Psychometric Properties

Çok Boyutlu İhmal Davranışları Ölçeği Yetişkin Geriye Dönük Hatırlama Formu’nun Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Yavuz Koşan(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4118-4777
Şahabettin Mutlu(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5521-2022
Kenan Alparslan(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6701-355X
Pages
1134–1156
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that both forms retained the original four-factor structure consisting of emotional, cognitive, supervisory, and physical neglect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to adapt the Adult Recall Form of the Multidimensional Neglectful Behaviors Scale (MNBS) into Turkish in a sample of young adults.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with 218 participants (174 women and 44 men) with a mean age of 23.8 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that both forms retained the original four-factor structure consisting of emotional, cognitive, supervisory, and physical neglect.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çocuk ihmali · ihmal davranışları · ihmal türleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the Adult Recall Form of the Multidimensional Neglectful Behaviors Scale (MNBS) into Turkish in a sample of young adults. The study was conducted with 218 participants (174 women and 44 men) with a mean age of 23.8 years. The construct validity of the 20-item long form and the psychometrically revised 8-item short form was examined using first- and second-order Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA). Because the data deviated from normality, Robust Maximum Likelihood (MLR) estimation was employed. The findings indicated that both forms retained the original four-factor structure consisting of emotional, cognitive, supervisory, and physical neglect. First-order CFA results demonstrated acceptable model fit for both forms, whereas second-order CFA findings suggested that the higher-order factor structure, particularly for the short form, should be interpreted with caution. For criterion-related validity, MNBS scores were significantly and negatively correlated with scores on the Parental Bonding Instrument, consistent with theoretical expectations. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency for the total score (Cronbach alfa (α) = .93; McDonald’s ω = .93), as well as adequate composite reliability (CR = .90) and average variance extracted (AVE = .71). Overall, the Turkish version of the MNBS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing childhood neglectful behaviors among young adults.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Çok Boyutlu İhmal Davranışları Ölçeği Yetişkin Geriye Dönük Hatırlama Formu’nun (ÇBİDÖ) ağırlıklı olarak genç yetişkinlerden oluşan bir örneklemde Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Araştırma, yaş ortalaması 23,8 olan 218 katılımcı (174 kadın, 44 erkek) ile yürütülmüştür. Ölçeğin 20 maddelik uzun ve psikometrik olarak gözden geçirilmiş 8 maddelik kısa formunun yapı geçerliği, birinci ve ikinci düzey Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizleri (DFA) ile test edilmiştir. Verilerin normal dağılımdan sapması nedeniyle analizlerde Robust Maximum Likelihood (MLR) kestirimi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, her iki formun da özgün yapıyla uyumlu dört alt boyutlu (duygusal, bilişsel, denetimsel ve fiziksel ihmal) yapıyı koruduğunu göstermiştir. Birinci düzey DFA sonuçları, her iki form için kabul edilebilir uyum değerleri sunarken, ikinci düzey DFA bulguları üst faktör yapısının, özellikle kısa form açısından temkinli yorumlanması gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik kapsamında, ÇBİDÖ puanları ile Anneye Bağlanma Ölçeği puanları arasında kuramsal beklentilerle uyumlu anlamlı ve negatif ilişkiler saptanmıştır. Ölçeğin genel puanına ilişkin iç tutarlılık katsayıları (Cronbach alfa (α) = .93; McDonald’s ω = .93) ile birleşik güvenirlik (CR = .90) ve ortalama açıklanan varyans (AVE = .71) değerleri kabul edilebilir sınırların üzerindedir. Sonuç olarak ÇBİDÖ genç yetişkinlerde çocukluk döneminde yaşanan ihmal davranışlarını değerlendirmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koşan, Y., Mutlu, Ş., Alparslan, K. (2026). Adaptation of the Multidimensional Neglectful Behavior Scale into Turkish and Examination of its Psychometric Properties. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 1134–1156. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1750311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Avdibegović, E., & Brkić, M. (2020). Child neglect: Causes and consequences. Psychiatria Danubina, 32(Suppl. 3), 337–342.
  2. Bakır, E., & Kapucu, S. (2017). Çocuk ihmali ve istismarının Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmalara yansıması: Bir literatür incelemesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 13–24. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hunhemsire/issue/30737/335821
  3. Baldwin, J. R., Reuben, A., Newbury, J. B., & Danese, A. (2019). Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(6), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0097
  4. Beyazit, U., Taşçıoğlu, G., & Bütün Ayhan, A. (2024). The adaptation of the Multidimensional Neglectful Behavior Scale-Adolescent/Adult Recall Form into Turkish: Validity and reliability studies. Children and Youth Services Review, 157, 107439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107439
  5. Bornstein, M. H. (2013). Parenting and child mental health: A cross-cultural perspective. World Psychiatry, 12(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20071
  6. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.130.3.201
  7. Can, G., & Onnar, N. (2025). Çocukluk çağı travması, psikolojik esneklik ve OKB: Üçlü bir perspektif. Lokman Hekim Dergisi, 15(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1598041
  8. Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
  9. Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2019). What is child abuse and neglect? Recognizing the signs and symptoms. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau. https://www.childwelfare.gov/resources/what-child-abuse-and-neglect-recognizing-signs-and-symptoms/
  10. Fisher-Owens, S. A., Lukefahr, J. L., Tate, A. R., American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Oral Health, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Council on Clinical Affairs, Council on Scientific Affairs, & Ad Hoc Work Group on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2017). Oral and dental aspects of child abuse and neglect. Pediatrics, 140(2), e20171487. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1487
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  12. Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. (2009). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. The Lancet, 373(9657), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7
  13. González-Acosta, C. A., Rojas-Cerón, C. A., & Buriticá, E. (2021). Functional alterations and cerebral variations in humans exposed to early life stress. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 536188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.536188
  14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  15. Haworth, S., Schaub, J., Kidney, E., & Montgomery, P. (2024). A systematic review of measures of child neglect. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221138066
  16. Herrero-Roldán, S., León, I., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2021). Improving early diagnosis of child neglect for a better response in healthcare settings. Children, 8(10), 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8100859
  17. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1224
  18. Hornor, G. (2014). Child neglect: Assessment and intervention. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2013.10.002
  19. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  20. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
  21. Kapçı, E. G., & Küçüker, S. (2006). Ana babaya bağlanma ölçeği: Türk üniversite öğrencilerinde psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17(4), 286–295.
  22. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
  23. Kim, S.-H., Baek, M., & Park, S. (2021). Association of parent-child experiences with insecure attachment in adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 13(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12402
  24. Kobulsky, J. M., Villodas, M., Yoon, D., Wildfeuer, R., Steinberg, L., & Dubowitz, H. (2022). Adolescent neglect and health risk. Child Maltreatment, 27(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211049795
  25. Liu, S., Xia, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Measurement tools of child neglect from 2003 to 2023: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(5), 543–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241244826
  26. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  27. Mennen, F. E., Kim, K., Sang, J., & Trickett, P. K. (2010). Child neglect: Definition and identification of youth’s experiences in official reports of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(9), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.02.007
  28. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. SAGE Publications.
  29. Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 9(11), e1001349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349
  30. Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x
  31. Raby, K. L., Labella, M. H., Martin, J., Carlson, E. A., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Childhood abuse and neglect and insecure attachment states of mind in adulthood: Prospective, longitudinal evidence from a high-risk sample. Development and Psychopathology, 29(2), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000037
  32. Sarmento, R. P., & Costa, V. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis—A case study [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05598
  33. Straus, M. A., Kinard, E. M., & Williams, L. M. (2008). The Multidimensional Neglectful Behavior Scale, Form A: Adolescent and adult-recall version. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
  34. Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33
  35. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  36. Trujillo-Llano, C., Sainz-Ballesteros, A., Suarez-Ardila, F., Gonzalez-Gadea, M. L., Ibáñez, A., Herrera, E., & Baez, S. (2024). Neuroanatomical markers of social cognition in neglected adolescents. Neurobiology of Stress, 31, 100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100642
  37. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2023). Child maltreatment 2021. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/data-research/child-maltreatment
  38. Watson, C. B., Sharpley, C. F., Bitsika, V., Evans, I., & Vessey, K. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between childhood maltreatment and adult depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 151(5), 572–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13794
  39. Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
  40. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
  41. World Health Organization. (2020). Global status report on preventing violence against children 2020: Executive summary. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332394/9789240004191-eng.pdf
  42. World Health Organization. (2022). Child maltreatment. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/child-maltreatment
  43. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  44. Yang, L., & Huang, M. (2024). Childhood maltreatment and mentalizing capacity: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 149, 106623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106623
  45. Zastrow, C. H., Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hessenauer, S. L. (2019). Understanding human behavior and the social environment (11th ed.). Cengage.