Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 16

Assesment in Foster Care Services

Koruyucu Aile Hizmetlerinde Değerlendirme Süreci

Pages
86–94
Publication Date
2009-03-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, the aim of this study is to discuss and evaluate the problems raise during foster care in the frame of the experiences obtained during the work with children under foster care placement and consulted for different kinds of problems in child psychiatry clinic and make suggesstions for assessment and follow-up practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Experiences gained through clinical work is very effective in determining key factors to improve foster care services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These practices point out the importance of professional assessment of the family and child before the placement and follow-up after the placement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, the aim of this study is to discuss and evaluate the problems raise during foster care in the frame of the experiences obtained during the work with children under foster care placement and consulted for different kinds of problems in child psychiatry clinic and make suggesstions for assessment and follow-up practices.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Koruyucu aile · koruyucu aile hizmetleri · Foster family

Abstract

Experiences gained through clinical work is very effective in determining key factors to improve foster care services. These practices point out the importance of professional assessment of the family and child before the placement and follow-up after the placement. For this reason, the aim of this study is to discuss and evaluate the problems raise during foster care in the frame of the experiences obtained during the work with children under foster care placement and consulted for different kinds of problems in child psychiatry clinic and make suggesstions for assessment and follow-up practices.

Özet

Klinik çalışmalarda elde edilen deneyimler, koruyucu aile hizmetlerinin geliştirilmesi açısından önemli noktaların saptanmasında oldukça etkilidir. Bu çalışmalar, koruyucu aile hizmetlerinin yürütülmesinde çocuğun koruyucu aile yanına yerleştirilmesinden önce, ailenin ve çocuğun profesyonel olarak değerlendirilmesinin ve yerleştirme sonrasında da izlenmesinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmanın amacı, koruyucu aile bakımında olan ve farklı sorunlar nedeniyle çocuk ruh sağlığı bölümüne başvuran çocukların tedavisi sırasında klinikte yürütülen aileye yönelik sosyal hizmet uygulamalarından elde edilen deneyimler çerçevesinde koruyucu aile bakımında karşılaşılan sorunları tartışarak değerlendirme ve izleme çalışmaları için önerilerde bulunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özbesler, Y. D. D. C. (2009). Assesment in Foster Care Services. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 16, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.69682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

Loading PDF document...

References (6)

  1. Barth, R.P., (2001) “Policy Implications of Foster Family Characteristics”, Family Relations, 50, 16 – 19.
  2. Becker, Marion, Neil Jordan ve Rebecca Larsen (2006) “Behavioral Health Services Use and Costs Among Children in Foster Care”. Child Welfare. May/Jun. 85 (3) P: 633 – 647.
  3. Cohen Julie and Victoria Youcha. “Zer oto Three: Critical Issues for the Juvenile and Family Court”. Juve- nile and Family Court Journal. 55(2). 2004 15 – 27.
  4. Denby , R., Rindfleisch, N., Bean, G. (1999) “Predictors of Foster Parents’ Satisfaction and Intent to Con- tinue to Foster”, Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 287-303.
  5. Holland, P., Kevin, M.G., (2004) “Historical, Develop- mental, and Behavioral Factors Associated with Foster Care Challenges.” Child And Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21 (2) 117-135.
  6. Fish, B., Bette, C. (2004) “Mental Health Risks to Infants and Toddlers in Foster Care”. Clinical Social Work Journal, Summer 32 (2) 121.