Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 22

Characteristics and Treatment Programmes of Adolescent Sexual Offenders

Cinsel Suça Yönelen Çocukların Karakteristikleri ve Tedavi Programları

Pages
47–56
Publication Date
2010-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion of these explanation, many treatment programs for juveniles who have commited sex offences can be developed such as multi systemic treatment and cognitive –behavioral technics conducted in groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Modern childhood approach provided that juvenile offenders are treated different form adult.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of model is Ryan, Lane, Davis ve Lsaac (1987)’s sexual abuse cycle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion of these explanation, many treatment programs for juveniles who have commited sex offences can be developed such as multi systemic treatment and cognitive –behavioral technics conducted in groups.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cinsel suç ve çocuk · cinsel istismar tedavi programları · Sexual offenders and adolescent

Abstract

Modern childhood approach provided that juvenile offenders are treated different form adult. This article is given information about theoritical expalanation, characteristics, treatment programmes of adolescent sexual offenders. There are two explanation about causes of juvenile sexual offenders. One of model is Ryan, Lane, Davis ve Lsaac (1987)’s sexual abuse cycle. This model assert that when adolescent meet negative reflections, He has negative self concept then has negative coping strategies. So adolescent is socially isolated then he wants to be powerfull. As a conclusion offence behaviour is occured then adolescent feels negatve feelings so cycle is concluded. Second model is Becker and Kaplan (1988)’s model. According to this model sexual offence occured because of individully characteristics. Several studies thathave described the backgrounds of juvenile male sexual offenders have found an overlap among adolescent sexual offenders, juvenile delinquents, boys from abusive and neglectful families, and socially isolated boys. As a conclusion of these explanation, many treatment programs for juveniles who have commited sex offences can be developed such as multi systemic treatment and cognitive –behavioral technics conducted in groups.

Özet

Modern çocukluk anlayışı suça sürüklenen çocukların yetişkinlerden ayrı “çocuk” olarak muamele görmelerini sağlamıştır. Bu makalede cinsel suça sürüklenen çocuklarla ilgili teorik açıklamalar, çocukların karakteristik özellikleri ve tedavi programları konusunda bilgi verilmiştir. Çocukların cinsel suça sürüklenmesinin nedenine ilişkin bugüne kadar literatürde iki model belirlenmiştir. Bu modellerden biri Ryan, Lane, Davis ve Lsaac (1987)’ın cinsel istismar döngüsüdür. Bu model, ergenin kendisine yönelik negatif tepkilerle karşılaştığı zaman negatif benlik imajı geliştirdiğini böylece sağlıksız baş etme stratejilerinin arttığını iddia etmektedir. Negatif benlik imajı aynı zamanda diğer kişilere karşı negatif reaksiyona yol açmaktadır. Bu durumdan kendisini korumak için adölesan, sosyal olarak yalnızlaşır ve kontrollü ya da güçlü olmadığı duygusunu kompanse etmek için fantezilere başlar. Sonuç olarak cinsel suç davranışı ortaya çıkar, cinsel suç ise negatif benlik imajına ve reddedilme düşüncesine yol açar ve görüldüğü gibi döngü tamamlanır. İkinci model ise Becker ve Kaplan (1988)modelidir. Bu modele göre cinsel suç bireysel karakteristiklerin bir kombinasyonundan ortaya çıkmaktadır. Örneğin; sosyal becerinin olmayışı ve cinsel olmayan bir sapma öyküsü, aile ilişkilerini kapsayan aile değişkenleri ve sosyal-çevresel değişkenler örneğin sosyal izalosyon ve antisosyal davranış ilk cinsel suçun oluşumuna yol açabilmektedir. Bu açıklamalar ergenlere yönelik tedavi programlarında multi sistemik tedavi ve sosyal beceri eğitim programlarının gelişmesinde etkili olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öntaş, D. D. Ö. C. (2010). Characteristics and Treatment Programmes of Adolescent Sexual Offenders. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 22, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.81115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Awad, G.A., ve Saunders, E.B. (1989). “Adolescent child molesters: Clinical observations”, Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 19, 195-206.
  2. Becker, J. V., ve Hunter, J. A. (1993). Aggressive sex offenders. Child and Adolescent.
  3. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2(3), 477-487.
  4. Becker, Jutih V.(1998) “What We Know About The Char- acteristics and Treatment of Adolescent Who Have Committed Sexual offenses” Child Mal- treatment, 3(4), 317-329.
  5. Becker, J. V., ve Kaplan, M. S. (1988). The assessment of adolescent sexual offenders. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families,. 4:97-118. Madison, CT: JAI.
  6. Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., ve Stein, R. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of ado- lescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105-114.
  7. Borduin, C. M. (1999). Multisystemic treatment of crimi- nality and violence in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psy- chiatry, 38, 242-249. Empirical and Clinical Findings”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35(4): 328-330.
  8. Mathews, R., Hunter, J. A., ve Vuz, J. (1997). “Juvenile female sexual offenders: Clinical characteristics and treatment issues”. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(3), 187-199.
  9. Ryan, G., Lane, S., Davis, J., ve Issac, C. (1987). “Juve- nile sex offenders: Development and correction”. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11385-395.
  10. Swenson C., Cynthia; S. W. Henggeler, S. K. Schoen- wald; K. L. Kaufman; J. R. (1998) “Changing The Social Ecologies of Adolescent Sexual Offend- ers: Implications of the Success of Multisystemic Therapy in Treating Serious Antisocial Behavior in Adolescent”. Child Maltreatment, 3(4), 330-338.
  11. Schram, D., Milloy, C., ve Rowe, W. (1991). Juvenile sex offenders: A follow-up study of reoffense behav- ior. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
  12. Schwartz, I. M., Guo, S. ve J. J. Kerbs. (1993). “The Im- pact of Demographic Variables on Public Opinion Regarding Juvenile Justice: Implications for Pub- lic Policy”. Crime and Delinquency,39(1), 5-28.
  13. Vaillant, P. M ve Dan H. A. (1992). “Rapist, Incest Offenders and Child Molesters in Treatment: Cognitive and Social Skills Training: Cognitive And Social Skills Training” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36(3): 221-230.
  14. sessment and Disposition Planning A Revive of
  15. Becker, J. V., ve Kaplan, M. S. (1988). The assessment of adolescent sexual offenders. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families,. 4:97-118. Madison, CT: JAI.
  16. Ryan, G., Lane, S., Davis, J., ve Issac, C. (1987). “Juve- nile sex offenders: Development and correction”. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11385-395.