Journals / Mukaddime / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Religious Identity-Centered Selective Incorporation: The Social Participation of Muslim Americans Under Conditions of Islamophobia

Dini Kimlik Merkezli Seçici Bütünleşme: İslamofobi Koşullarında Müslüman Amerikalıların Toplumsal Katılımı

Servet Tas(University of Kansas, Department of Sociology)0009-0006-9451-6455
Journal
Mukaddime
Pages
202–225
Publication Date
2026-05-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that discriminatory social conditions transform Muslim identity into a site of symbolic resistance, yet rather than hindering social incorporation, these dynamics produce an alternative, ethics-based mode of selective integration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines how Muslim Americans living in Lubbock, Texas, a city characterized by strong Christian conservatism, navigate their identities and pursue social integration amid pervasive Islamophobia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on in-depth interviews with 30 Muslim Americans and ethnographic observations, this qualitative research analyzes how religious visibility, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status influence experiences of discrimination and belonging.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that discriminatory social conditions transform Muslim identity into a site of symbolic resistance, yet rather than hindering social incorporation, these dynamics produce an alternative, ethics-based mode of selective integration.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İslamofobi · Müslüman Amerikalılar · dini kimlik

Abstract

This study examines how Muslim Americans living in Lubbock, Texas, a city characterized by strong Christian conservatism, navigate their identities and pursue social integration amid pervasive Islamophobia. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 30 Muslim Americans and ethnographic observations, this qualitative research analyzes how religious visibility, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status influence experiences of discrimination and belonging. The findings reveal that discriminatory social conditions transform Muslim identity into a site of symbolic resistance, yet rather than hindering social incorporation, these dynamics produce an alternative, ethics-based mode of selective integration. Participants develop a hierarchical identity structure in which Muslim identity is positioned as primary and essential, while American identity is viewed as secondary but complementary. The study introduces the concept of religious identity-centered integration, framing Muslim American integration as a selective process grounded in the ethical alignment between Islamic and American values, such as justice, freedom, and equality. Islamic institutions and faith-based solidarity networks emerge as organizational spaces that facilitate social participation and cultivate a sense of belonging. The analysis highlights the ongoing tension between Islamophobia and religious identity in structuring Muslim Americans' identity work and their pathways toward integration. Moving beyond the assimilation-pluralism binary, this reseach offers a new analytical framework for understanding how religious identity functions as a transformative resource for social incorporation. Thus, the study contributes to scholarly discourses on migration, identity, and minority integration.

Özet

Bu çalışma, güçlü bir Hristiyan muhafazakârlığı kimliğine sahip Texas eyaletinin Lubbock kentinde yaşayan Müslüman Amerikalıların kimlik müzakerelerini ve toplumsal bütünleşme biçimlerini, yaygın İslamofobi ortamında nasıl şekillendiğini incelemektedir. Otuz katılımcıyla yapılan derinlemesine görüşmeler ve etnografik gözlemler üzerine inşa edilen bu nitel araştırma, ayrımcılık ve aidiyet deneyimlerinde dini görünürlük, cinsiyet, ırk/etnisite ve sosyoekonomik statünün kesişimsel etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Bulgular, dışlayıcı toplumsal koşulların Müslüman kimliğini sembolik bir direnç alanına dönüştürdüğünü, ancak bu durumun entegrasyonu engellemek yerine etik temelli alternatif bir bütünleşme biçimini ürettiğini göstermektedir. Katılımcılar hiyerarşik bir kimlik yapısı geliştirmekte; Müslüman kimliğini birincil ve özsel, Amerikalı kimliğini ise ikincil ancak tamamlayıcı bir aidiyet biçimi olarak konumlandırmaktadır. Çalışma, dini kimlik merkezli bütünleşme kavramını geliştirerek, Müslüman Amerikalıların bütünleşmesini adalet, özgürlük ve eşitlik gibi İslami ve Amerikan değerleri arasındaki etik uyum temelinde gerçekleşen seçici bir entegrasyon biçimi olarak tanımlamaktadır. Bu süreçte İslami kurumlar ve inanç temelli dayanışma ağları, bireylerin toplumsal katılımını ve aidiyet duygusunu destekleyen örgütsel alanlar haline gelmektedir. Bu bulgular, İslamofobi deneyimleri ile dinsel kimlik arasındaki etkileşimin Müslüman Amerikalıların kimlik inşası ve seçici entegrasyon süreçlerinde belirleyici bir rol oynadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, asimilasyon–çoğulculuk dikotomisini aşan, toplumsal bütünleşmede alternatif bir analitik çerçeve sunarak göç, kimlik ve azınlık bütünleşmesi literatürüne özgün bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tas, S. (2026). Religious Identity-Centered Selective Incorporation: The Social Participation of Muslim Americans Under Conditions of Islamophobia. Mukaddime, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 202–225. https://doi.org/10.19059/mukaddime.1833749

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Ajrouch, K. J. (2004). Gender, race, and symbolic boundaries: Contested spaces of identity among Arab American adolescents. Sociological Perspectives, 47(4), 371–391. doi:10.1525/sop.2004.47.4.371
  2. Ajrouch, K. J., & Kusow, A. M. (2007). Racial and religious contexts: Situational identities among Lebanese and Somali Muslim immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(1), 72–94. doi:10.1080/01419870601006553
  3. Ali, M. (2011). Muslim American/American Muslim identity: Authoring self in post-9/11 America. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 31(3), 355–381. doi:10.1080/13602004.2011.599543
  4. Alimohamed-Wilson, S. (2019). When the FBI knocks: Racialized state surveillance of Muslims. Critical Sociology, 45(6), 871–887. doi:10.1177/0896920517750742
  5. Association of Religion Data Archive. (2010). Muslim estimate counties. Erişim adresi: http://www.thearda.com/ql2010/QL_C_2010_1_28c.asp
  6. Awad, G. H. (2012). The impact of acculturation and religious identification on perceived discrimination for Arab/Middle Eastern Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(1), 59–67. doi:10.1037/a0016675
  7. Bail, C. A. (2014). Terrified: How anti-Muslim fringe organizations became mainstream. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Bakalian, A., & Bozorgmehr, M. (2011). Middle Eastern and Muslim American studies since 9/11. Sociological Forum, 26(3), 714–728. Erişim adresi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23027311
  9. Barreto, M., Masuoka, N., & Sanchez, G. (2008, March). Religiosity, discrimination and group identity among Muslim Americans. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Diego, CA.
  10. Bartkowski, J. P., & Read, J. G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender, power, and identity among evangelical and Muslim women in the United States. Qualitative Sociology, 26(1), 71–92. doi:10.1023/A:1021456004419
  11. Bayoumi, M. (2015). This Muslim American life: Dispatches from the war on terror. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  12. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  13. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
  14. Bilici, M. (2012). Finding Mecca in America: How Islam is becoming an American religion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Bleich, E. (2011). What is Islamophobia and how much is there? Theorizing and measuring an emerging comparative concept. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(12), 1581–1600. doi:10.1177/0002764211409387
  16. Britto, P. R., & Amer, M. M. (2007). An exploration of cultural identity patterns and the family context among Arab Muslim young adults in America. Applied Developmental Science, 11(3), 137–150. doi:10.1080/10888690701454633
  17. Cainkar, L. (2009). Homeland insecurity: The Arab American and Muslim American experience after 9/11. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  18. Cainkar, L., & Selod, S. (2018). Review of race scholarship and the war on terror. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(2), 165–177. doi:10.1177/2332649218762808
  19. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  20. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
  21. Etengoff, C., & Daiute, C. (2013). Sunni-Muslim American religious development during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(6), 690–714. doi:10.1177/0743558413477197
  22. Fatima, S. (2011). Who counts as a Muslim? Identity, multiplicity and politics. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 31(3), 339–353. doi:10.1080/13602004.2011.599542
  23. Furseth, I. (2011). The hijab: Boundary work and identity negotiations among immigrant Muslim women in the Los Angeles area. Review of Religious Research, 52(4), 365–385. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055567
  24. Gans, H. J. (1992). Second-generation decline: Scenarios for the economic and ethnic futures of post-1965 American immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15(2), 173–192. doi:10.1080/01419870.1992.9993740
  25. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  26. Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  27. Gray, P., Williamson, J., Karpa, D., & Dalphin, J. (2007). Research imagination: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Grewal, Z. (2013). Islam is a foreign country: American Muslims and the global crisis of authority. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  29. Haddad, Y. Y. (2007). The post-9/11 hijab as icon. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 253–267. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20453163
  30. Haddad, Y. Y., & Harb, N. N. (2014). Post-9/11: Making Islam an American religion. Religions, 5(2), 477–501. doi:10.3390/rel5020477
  31. Jamal, A. (2005). Mosques, collective identity, and gender differences among Arab American Muslims. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 1(1), 53–78. Erişim adresi: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/408729/pdf
  32. Joshi, K. Y. (2006). The racialization of Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(3), 211–226. doi:10.1080/10665680600790327
  33. Kalkan, K. O., Layman, G. C., & Uslaner, E. M. (2009). "Bands of others"? Attitudes toward Muslims in contemporary American society. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 847–862. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090756
  34. Kanuha, V. K. (2000). "Being" native versus "going native": Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447. doi:10.1093/sw/45.5.439
  35. Karam, R. A. (2020). Becoming American by becoming Muslim: Strategic assimilation among second-generation Muslim American parents. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(2), 390–409. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1578396
  36. KCBD. (2024). Share of Lubbock County vote compared to '20, '16. Erişim adresi: https://www.kcbd.com/2024/11/06/trump-increases-share-lubbock-county-vote-compared-20-16/
  37. Love, E. (2017). Islamophobia and racism in America. New York, NY: NYU Press.
  38. Maira, S. M. (2009). Missing: Youth, citizenship, and empire after 9/11. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  39. Mir, S. (2014). Muslim American women on campus: Undergraduate social life and identity. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  40. Moore, K. M. (2007). Visible through the veil: The regulation of Islam in American law. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 237–251. doi:10.1093/socrel/68.3.237
  41. Naber, N. (2005). Muslim first, Arab second: A strategic politics of race and gender. The Muslim World, 95(4), 479–495. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.2005.00107.x
  42. O'Brien, J. (2013). Muslim American youth and secular hip hop: Manifesting "cool piety" through musical practices. Poetics, 41(2), 99–121. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2012.12.001
  43. Park, R. E. (1914). Racial assimilation in secondary groups with particular reference to the Negro. American Journal of Sociology, 19(5), 606–623. doi:10.1086/212297
  44. Peek, L. (2005). Becoming Muslim: The development of a religious identity. Sociology of Religion, 66(3), 215–242. doi:10.2307/4153097
  45. Peek, L. (2011). Behind the backlash: Muslim Americans after 9/11. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  46. Pew Research Center. (2017). U.S. Muslims concerned about their place in society. Erişim adresi: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2017/07/26/findings-from-pew-research-centers-2017-survey-of-us-muslims/
  47. Pew Research Center. (2024). How U.S. Muslims are experiencing the Israel–Hamas war. Erişim adresi: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/02/how-us-muslims-are-experiencing-the-israel-hamas-war/
  48. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  49. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96. doi:10.1177/0002716293530001006
  50. Read, J. N. G., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2000). To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender & Society, 14(3), 395–417. doi:10.1177/089124300014003003
  51. Selod, S. (2015). Citizenship denied: The racialization of Muslim American men and women post-9/11. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 77–95. doi:10.1177/0896920513516022
  52. Sirin, S. R., & Fine, M. (2007). Hyphenated selves: Muslim American youth negotiating identities on the fault lines of global conflict. Applied Developmental Science, 11(3), 151–163. doi:10.1080/10888690701454658
  53. Sirin, S. R., Bikmen, N., Mir, M., Fine, M., Zaal, M., & Katsiaficas, D. (2008). Exploring dual identification among Muslim-American emerging adults: A mixed methods study. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 259–279. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.10.009
  54. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  55. Tindongan, C. W. (2011). Negotiating Muslim youth identity in a post-9/11 world. The High School Journal, 95(1), 72–87. doi:10.1353/hsj.2011.0012
  56. Williams, R. H., & Vashi, G. (2007). Hijab and American Muslim women: Creating the space for autonomous selves. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 269–287. doi:10.1093/socrel/68.3.269
  57. Zainiddinov, H. (2016). Racial and ethnic differences in perceptions of discrimination among Muslim Americans. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(15), 2701–2721. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1164877