Journals / Artuklu Akademi / 2015 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Speakers Controversies between Text and History-From (The Third to the Sixth Century of the Islamic Century)

Nass ve Tarih Bağlamında Kelamcılar Arasındaki İhtilaflar (H. 3. ve 6. Asırlar Arasında)

Pages
71–87
Publication Date
2015-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The objective material resulted from speech controversies in that historical stage is not holy to the extent that makes it replace the text and be a substitute of it.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research argues the impact of text and history in the controversies of speakers between the third and the sixth century of the Islamic era.
📊
Key Findings & Data:I have discussed that in three chapters, the first is about the causes of speech controversy, the second is about its effects, and the third is about the approach that ought to be based on the research, however, can be concluded in the main following points; Speech controversy among its famous schools doesn’t tend to demean the test but, on the contrary, tries to comprehend the text and make use of its contents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The objective material resulted from speech controversies in that historical stage is not holy to the extent that makes it replace the text and be a substitute of it.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:mütekellim · tenzih · nass

Abstract

The research argues the impact of text and history in the controversies of speakers between the third and the sixth century of the Islamic era. I have discussed that in three chapters, the first is about the causes of speech controversy, the second is about its effects, and the third is about the approach that ought to be based on the research, however, can be concluded in the main following points; Speech controversy among its famous schools doesn’t tend to demean the test but, on the contrary, tries to comprehend the text and make use of its contents. History has a clear influence in formulating the speech proof and understanding the audio one. The objective material resulted from speech controversies in that historical stage is not holy to the extent that makes it replace the text and be a substitute of it.

Özet

Makalede h. 3 asır ile 6. asırlar arasında mütekellimlerin arasındaki ihtilafın

🔖

Cite This Article

Aldibo, I. (2015). Speakers Controversies between Text and History-From (The Third to the Sixth Century of the Islamic Century). Artuklu Akademi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 71–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/1063135

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (8)

  1. Abdulcebbâr, Kâdî, Şerhu’l-Usuli’l-Hamse, (tahk. Abdulkerim Osman), Kahire 1996.
  2. Abdulcebbâr, Kâdî, el-Muğnî fî Ebvabi’t-Tevhîd ve’l-Adl, (tahk. M. Mustafa Hilmi-Ebü’l-Vefa Gânîmî), Kahire tsz.
  3. Bağdâdî,Abdulkahir, Usuli’d-Din, y.y. tsz.
  4. Bakillânî, el-İnsâf fîmâ Yecibu İ’tikâduhû velâ Yecûzu’l-Cehlu bihî, (tahk. M. Zahid el-Kevserî), Kâhire 1980.
  5. Cüveynî, Ebi’l-Meâlî Abdilmelik, Kitabü’l-İrşâd, (tahk. M. Yusuf Musa- A. Abdulhamid), Mısır 1950.
  6. Eş’arî, Makâlâtü’l-İslâmiyyîn ve İhtilâfü’l-Musallîn, (tahk. M. Muhiddin Abdulhamid), Beyrut 1990.
  7. Eş’arî, el-İbâne an Usûli’d-Diyâne, (tahk. B. Muhammed Uyun), Dımaşk 1996. İbn Hazm, el-Fasl fi’l-Milel ve’l-Ehvâi ve’n-Nihal, (M İbrahim Nasr), Beyrut tsz.
  8. Nesefi, Tabsıratü’l-Edille fî Usuli’d-Din, (tahk. K. Selâme), Dımaşk 1990. Sâbunî, Nureddîn, el-Bidâye mine’l-Kifâye, (tahk. Fethullah Huleyf), Mısır 1969.