SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Artuklu Akademi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Prophets and Physical Defects (A Theological Comparative Study between Sunnies and Mu'tazila)

Peygamberlerde Bulunmayan Biyolojik Kusurlar (Sünnî ve Mutezilî Kelamına Dair Bir Araştırma)

Hasan Alkhattaf
Pages
149–169
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper attempts to answer these questions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:God has created Man and guided him through his Messengers so that Man is not left to the hesitations and volatilities of his intellect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Messengers were human chosen from among the best so that people could accept them and had no pretext not to follow their path.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper attempts to answer these questions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İsmet · Tiksindiren Hastalıklar · Mutezile

Abstract

God has created Man and guided him through his Messengers so that Man is not left to the hesitations and volatilities of his intellect. The Messengers were human chosen from among the best so that people could accept them and had no pretext not to follow their path. Being human, Messengers had the same human needs like food, drink and marriage. They were also exposed to sickness and death. However, the question is whether Messengers could suffer from diseases such as leprosy and effect that such disease would have on their mission as Messengers of God. Would infallibility include protection from such contagious and repulsive diseases? Is there a difference between the Sunnis and Mu'tazila's on this issue? The paper attempts to answer these questions.

Özet

Allah insanları yaratmış ve sadece akıllarına dayanarak şaşkın bir şekilde

🔖

Cite This Article

Alkhattaf, H. (2017). Prophets and Physical Defects (A Theological Comparative Study between Sunnies and Mu'tazila). Artuklu Akademi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 149–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/1063104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adevî, Ahmed b. Muhammed, el-Haritetü’l-Behiyye fi İlmi’t-Tevhîd, tah. Abdusselam b. Abdulhadi Şennar, Beyrut-Dimeşk 2004.
  2. Buhârî, Ebû A bdillâh M uhammed b. İ smâîl b. İ brâhîm e l-Cu‘fî el-Buhârî, Sahîhü’l-Buhârî, tah. Muhammed Zuheyr b. Nasır en-Nasır, 1. Baskı, Dârü’s-Selâm, Riyâd 1999.
  3. Kurtubî, Ebû Abdillâh Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Ebî Bekr b. Ferh, Tefsîru’l- Kurtûbî, tah. Ahmed el-Berdûnî- İbrahim Ateş, Daru’l-Kutubi’l- Mısriyye, Kahire tsz.
  4. Keylânî, Muhammed Edip, Avnü’l-Murîd li Şerh-I evherü’t-Tevhîd, Daru’l- Beşair, 2. Baskı, Dimeşk 1999.
  5. Kirmânî, Muhammed b. Yûsuf, el-Kevâkibü’d-Dürârî fi Şerhi’l-Buhârî, Dâru İhyai’t-Türasi’l-Arebî, Beyrut-Lübnan 1937.
  6. Lâî, Hüseyn b. Muhammed b. Saîd el-Mağribî, el-Bedrü’t-Tihâm Şerhu Bulûği’l-Merâm, tah. Ali b. Abdullah ez-Zîn, Daru Hicr. y.y. tsz.
  7. Nevevî, Ebû Zekeriya Yahya b. Şeref b. Mürî, Riyazu’s-Sâlihîn, Daru İbn Kesir, 1. Baskı, Dimeşk-Beyrut 2007.
  8. Râzî, Ebu Abdillâh (Ebü'l-Fazl) Fahrüddîn Muhammed b. Ömer b. Hüseyn, Tefsîru’r-Râzî, Daru İhyai’t-Turasi’l-Arabi, 3. Baskı, Beyrut tsz.
  9. Suyûtî, Ebü’l-Fazl Celâlüddîn Abdurrahmân b. Ebî Bekr b. Muhammed el- Hudayrî, ed-Durrü’l-Mensûr Fi’Tefsîri’l-Me’sûr, Daru’l-Fıkr, Beyrut tsz.
  10. Türkmen, Hasan, “Ahbari-Usuli Ayrışmasında Sehvu'n-Nebi Meselesi”, İslami Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25/1, 2015.
  11. Ünverdi, Veysi, “Mu'tezile'de Peygamberlerin İsmeti”, Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, c. 15, sy. 1, 2015.
  12. Zuhayli, Vehbe, et-Tefsîru’l-Munîr Fi’l-Akîdeti ve’ş-Şerîati ve’l-Menheci, Daru’l- Fikri’l-Muasır, 2. Baskı, Dimeşk 1418.
  13. Buhârî, Ebû A bdillâh M uhammed b. İ smâîl b. İ brâhîm e l-Cu‘fî el-Buhârî, Sahîhü’l-Buhârî, tah. Muhammed Zuheyr b. Nasır en-Nasır, 1. Baskı, Dârü’s-Selâm, Riyâd 1999.