SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Konservatoryum / 2024 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

One Concept, Multiple Realizations A Case Study on Notation in Compositional Practice: Dark Bright

Bir Kavram, Çoklu Uygulamalar: Notasyon Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Ornek Uygulama Calısması: Dark Bright

Amy Salsgiver(İstanbul Technical University Graduate School, Centre for Advanced Studies in Music (MIAM)0000-0002-6911-8416
Pages
504–515
Publication Date
2024-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The resulting compositions, and conclusions based on comparing their outcomes, underscores the f luidity between composer and performer roles, reflecting on how shifting creative ownership can lead to more collaborative and transcultural music-making, while still allowing for a recognizable cohesion connecting the composition to its composer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper explores how diverse modes of notation, grounded in a single germinal idea, can yield multiple, distinct musical outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through a practice-based ap proach, the study investigates how different iterations of a musical work can emerge by employing, suppressing, or accentuating compositional, improvisational, and tran scriptional techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The resulting compositions, and conclusions based on comparing their outcomes, underscores the f luidity between composer and performer roles, reflecting on how shifting creative ownership can lead to more collaborative and transcultural music-making, while still allowing for a recognizable cohesion connecting the composition to its composer.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bestelemek · doğaçlama · notasyon

Abstract

This paper explores how diverse modes of notation, grounded in a single germinal idea, can yield multiple, distinct musical outcomes. Through a practice-based ap proach, the study investigates how different iterations of a musical work can emerge by employing, suppressing, or accentuating compositional, improvisational, and tran scriptional techniques. Rather than focusing on fixed forms, the study highlights the creation of musical atmospheres, spaces for exploration, and sound-based interaction, promoting a post-colonial approach to musical scores and notation that moves beyond Eurogenetic traditions. This approach encourages collective authorship and empathy within the process of musical generation. Each work employs a different approach to the communication of musical ideas to performers, with the choice of notational or scoring modality tailored to the specific circumstances of each piece. The resulting compositions, and conclusions based on comparing their outcomes, underscores the f luidity between composer and performer roles, reflecting on how shifting creative ownership can lead to more collaborative and transcultural music-making, while still allowing for a recognizable cohesion connecting the composition to its composer.

Özet

Bu makale, tek bir temel müzikal fikirden yola çıkarak kullanılan notasyon biçiminin nasıl farklı ve özgün müzikal sonuçlar doğurabileceğini incelemektedir. Uygulama odaklı bir yaklaşım izleyerek ve bestecilik, doğaçlama ve transkripsiyon tekniklerinin farklı şekillerde kullanılması ve bilinçli bir şekilde öne çıkartılması veya göz ardı edilmesi gibi yöntemlerle bir müzik eserinin farklı versiyonlarının nasıl ortaya çıka bileceği araştırılmaktadır. Burada sabit formlara odaklanmak yerine, müzikal atmos ferler, keşif alanları ve ses tabanlı etkileşimlerin gerçekleşmesi ön planda tutularak, müzikal partisyonlar ve notasyonlara ilişkin Avrupa-merkezli geleneklerin ötesine geçen ve müzikal üretim sürecinde kolektif yaratım ve empatiyi teşvik eden post kolonyalbiryaklaşımsavunulmaktadır.Süreçteortayaçıkmışolanherbiresermüzikal f ikirlerin icracılara aktarılması boyutunda da farklı bir yaklaşıma karşılık gelmektedir. Ayrıca eserlerde kullanılan notasyon biçimi her bir eserin kendi özel şartlarına uygun olarak belirlenmiştir. Ortaya çıkan müzik eserleri ve bunların karşılaştırılması ile elde edilen bulgular, bir yandan besteci ve icracı rollerinin arasındaki akışkanlığı vurgu larken, bir yandan da—besteci ile beste arasında gözle görülür bir uyumun kaybol mamasına özen göstermek şartıyla—yaratıcı sorumluluğun dağılımındaki değişimin daha sıkı bir işbirliği barındıran ve kültürel geçişlere izin veren müziklerin icrasına tanıyacağı olanaklara işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Salsgiver, A. (2024). One Concept, Multiple Realizations A Case Study on Notation in Compositional Practice: Dark Bright. Konservatoryum, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 504–515. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONS2024-1572432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Agawu, Kofi. (2016). The African Imagination in Music. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  2. Anderson, Virginia. (2013). The Beginning of Happiness: Approaching Scores in Graphic and Text Notation: Notational Perspective and Comprovisation. In P. deAssis, W. Brooks, & K. Coessens (Eds.), Sound & Score, Essays on Sound, Score and Notation (pp.130-142). Leuven University Press. google scholar
  3. Berger, H. M. (2010). Stance. Wesleyan University Press. google scholar
  4. Bhagwati, Sandeep. (2013). Notational Perspective and Comprovisation. In P. deAssis, W. Brooks, & K. Coessens (Eds.), Sound & Score, Essays on Sound, Score and Notation (pp.165-177). Leuven University Press. google scholar
  5. . (2018). What is critical curating? / Qu’est-ce que le commissariat engage? RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 43(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.2307/26530771 google scholar
  6. Cage, John. (1969). Notations. Something Else Press. google scholar
  7. Croft, J. (2015). Composition is not Research. Tempo, 272, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0040298214000989 google scholar
  8. de Assis, Paulo. (2013). Prelude. In P. deAssis, W. Brooks, & K. Coessens (Eds.), Sound & Score, Essays on Sound, Score and Notation (pp.5-11). Leuven University Press. google scholar
  9. Ekmektsoglou, Emmanouil. (2017). Folio of compositions and the Selective Subtraction of Tone and Rhythmic Material composition method. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of York. google scholar
  10. Ferneyhough, Brian. 1998. “Aspects of Notational and Compositional Practice.” In Brian Ferneyhough: Collected Writings, edited by James Boros and Richard Toop, 2-13. London/New York: Routledge. google scholar
  11. Harris, Yolande. (2013). “Score as Relationship: From Scores to Score Spaces to Scorescapes.” In P. deAssis, W. Brooks, & K. Coessens (Eds.), Sound & Score, Essays on Sound, Score and Notation (pp.195-217). Leuven University Press. google scholar
  12. Ingold, Tim. (2021). Being Alive. Routledge. google scholar
  13. Lewis, George. E. (2002). Improvised Music after 1950: Afrological and Eurological Perspectives. Black Music Research Journal, 215. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519950. Accessed 31 May 2023. google scholar
  14. Oliveros, Pauline. (2005). Deep Listening. iUniverse. google scholar
  15. Pace, I. (2015). Composition and Performance Can Be, and Often Have Been, Research. Tempo, 275, 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0040298215000637 google scholar
  16. Reigle, Robert. (2014). “Reconsidering the Idea of Timbre: A Brief History and New Proposals.” In MusiCult ’14: Music and Cultural Studies Conference, 233-43. Istanbul: DAKAM [Eastern Mediterranean Academic Research Center] google scholar
  17. Riedel, Friedlin. (2020). Atmospheric relations: theorising music and sound as atmosphere. In F. Riedel & J. Torvinen (Eds.), Music as Atmosphere: Collective Feelings and Affective Sounds (pp. 1-42). Routledge. google scholar
  18. Robinson, D. (2020). Hungry Listening: Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies. University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  19. Tenzer, Michael. (2017). In Honor of What We Can’t Groove to Yet. In R. D. Moore, College Music Curricula for a New Century (pp. 169-190). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190658397.003.0009 google scholar
  20. Vaden, T., & Torvinen, J. (2020). Musical Meaning In Between: Ineffability, Atmosphere and Asubjectivity in Musical Experience. In F. Riedel (Ed.), Music as Atmosphere: Collective Feelings and Affective Sound (pp. 43-59). Routledge. google scholar
  21. Vands0, A. (2020). The Sonic Aftermath. In S. K. Groth H. Schultze (Eds.), & H. Schulze (Trans.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Sound Art (pp. 21-40). Bloomsbury Publishing USA. google scholar
  22. Woodruff, J. (2020). Composing Sociality: Toward an Aesthetics of Transition Design. In S. K. Groth & H. Schulze (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Sound Art (pp. 41-70). Bloomsbury Publishing USA. google scholar
  23. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLONpiYPCrP7EgPPGsZnRJbpvMJ8RqChBr google scholar