SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 53 Sayı: 2

Pre-service Teachers’ Hope about Climate Change: Do Gender and Major Make a Difference?

Öğretmen Adaylarının İklim Değişikliğine İlişkin Umutları: Cinsiyet ve Branş Bir Fark Yaratır mı?

Sakip Kahraman(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3048-0215
Pages
594–623
Publication Date
2024-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that it could be used as a valid instrument to measure pre-service teachers’ hope about climate change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scope of the research was two-fold: (1) to determine climate change hope of pre-service teachers enrolled in three majors; (2) to investigate the effect of major and gender on their hope about climate change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, the data from 336 pre-service teachers were used to assess whether the Turkish version of the CCHS was valid and reliable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that it could be used as a valid instrument to measure pre-service teachers’ hope about climate change.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Umut · İklim Değişikliği · Öğretmen Adayları

Abstract

The scope of the research was two-fold: (1) to determine climate change hope of pre-service teachers enrolled in three majors; (2) to investigate the effect of major and gender on their hope about climate change. The data of the study, which followed the survey method, were gathered utilizing the “Climate Change Hope Scale - CCHS”. First, the data from 336 pre-service teachers were used to assess whether the Turkish version of the CCHS was valid and reliable. The results indicated that it could be used as a valid instrument to measure pre-service teachers’ hope about climate change. The reliability coefficient was found to be .82. The CCHS was then administered to 859 pre-service teachers enrolled at different universities in Turkey. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and contrast command. A statistically significant difference in climate change hope between female and male pre-service teachers enrolled in science education was found, in favor of females. However, simple effects in the other majors were not significant, indicating that for pre-service teachers enrolled in both primary school education and pre-school education, females and males had similar climate change hope scores.

Özet

Araştırmanın kapsamı iki yönlüdür: (1) Üç farklı branşta kayıtlı öğretmen adaylarının iklim değişikliği umutlarını belirlemek; (2) Branş ve cinsiyetin katılımcıların iklim değişikliğine dair umutları üzerindeki etkisini araştırmak. Tarama yönteminin izlendiği çalışmanın verileri “İklim Değişikliği Umut Ölçeği - İDUÖ” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. İlk olarak, 336 öğretmen adayından elde edilen veriler, İDUÖ'nün Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir olup olmadığını değerlendirmek için kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, İDUÖ'nün öğretmen adaylarının iklim değişikliğine dair umutlarını ölçmek için geçerli bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir. Güvenirlik katsayısı .82 olarak bulunmuştur. İDUÖ daha sonra Türkiye'deki farklı üniversitelerde kayıtlı 859 öğretmen adayına uygulanmıştır. Veriler, iki yönlü ANOVA, tek yönlü ANOVA ve kontrast komutu kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı’na kayıtlı kadın ve erkek öğretmen adayları arasında iklim değişikliği umudunda kadın öğretmen adayları lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte, diğer branşlardaki basit etkilerin anlamlı olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç hem sınıf eğitimi hem de okul öncesi eğitimine kayıtlı öğretmen adayları için kadın ve erkeklerin benzer iklim değişikliği umut puanlarına sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kahraman, S. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ Hope about Climate Change: Do Gender and Major Make a Difference?. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 Sayı: 2, 594–623. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1274014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (88)

  1. ACS Climate Science Working Group (n.d.). What are the greenhouse gas changes since the industrial revolution? Retrieved July 25, 2021, from https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/greenhousegases/industrialrevolution.html
  2. Albert, I., & Trommsdorff, G. (2014). The role of culture in social development over the life span: an interpersonal relations approach. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 6(2), 1-30 https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1057
  3. Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2006). A statistical analysis of children’s environmental knowledge and attitudes in Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee193.0
  4. Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
  5. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005
  6. Atkinson, J. (2017, April 10). What is earth’s energy budget? Five questions with a guy who knows. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/langley/what-is-earth-s-energy-budget-five-questions-with-a-guy-who-knows
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  8. Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78(4), 841-858. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863735
  9. Boon, H., (2014). Teachers and the communication of climate change science: a critical partnership in Australia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1006-1010. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.336
  10. Carmi, N., Arnon, S., & Orion, N. (2015). Transforming environmental knowledge into behavior: The mediating role of environmental emotions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1028517
  11. Carter, M. J. (2014). Gender socialization and identity theory. Social Sciences, 3(2), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3020242
  12. Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kesercioglu, T. (2009). Turkish students' views on environmental challenges with respect to gender: An analysis of ROSE data. Science Education International, 20(1-2), 69-78.
  13. Chisnall, P. (1997). Marketing Research (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, UK.
  14. Connell, S., J. Fien, J. Lee, H. Sykes, & D. Yencken. (1999). If it doesn’t directly affect you, you don’t think about it: A qualitative study of young people’s environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462990050106
  15. Council of Higher Education [YÖK] (n.d.). New undergraduate teacher development programs. Retrieved January, 05, 2024 from https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idari-birimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  17. Dada, D. O., Eames, C., & Calder, N. (2017). Impact of environmental education on beginning preservice teachers’ environmental literacy. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2017.27
  18. Echavarren, J. M. (2023). The gender gap in environmental concern: support for an ecofeminist perspective and the role of gender egalitarian attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(9), 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3
  19. Ergun, S. J., Khan, M. U., & Rivas, M. F. (2021). Factors affecting climate change concern in Pakistan: Are there rural/urban differences? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 34553–34569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13082-7
  20. Favier, T., Van Gorp, B., Cyvin, J. B., & Cyvin, J. (2021). Learning to teach climate change: students in teacher training and their progression in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(4), 594-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1900080
  21. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE.
  22. Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597-1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
  23. Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair and transformation: climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-2-13
  24. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
  25. Gezer, M., & Ilhan, M. (2020). Climate Change Hope Scale: A study of adaptation to Turkish [İklim değişikliğinin önlenmesine yönelik umut ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması]. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14(34), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.322.16
  26. Gillett, N. P., Weaver, A. J., Zwiers, F. W., & Flannigan, M. D. (2004). Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(18), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020876
  27. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2013). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  28. Gunsen, G. (2023). Investigation of the effect of environmental education activities on preschool teacher candidates' ecological footprint awareness and environmental awareness levels of interest. International Journal of Primary Education Studies, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.59062/ijpes.1233687
  29. Haines, A., Kovats, R. S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., & Corvalán, C. (2006). Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health, 120(7), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002
  30. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  31. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2008). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf
  33. Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52(4), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00153
  34. Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring model fit. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
  35. Kim, K. H., Kabir, E., & Ara Jahan, S. (2014). A review of the consequences of global climate change on human health. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, 32(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2014.941279
  36. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principals and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  37. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  38. Kurup, P. M., Levinson, R., & Li, X. (2021). Informed-decision regarding global warming and climate change among high school students in the United Kingdom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 21(1), 166-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00123-5
  39. Lawson, D. F., Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., & Seekamp, E. (2019). Children can foster climate change concern among their parents. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 458-462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0463-3
  40. Lee, E., Park, N. K., & Han, J. H. (2013). Gender difference in environmental attitude and behaviors in adoption of energy-efficient lighting at home. Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(9), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v6n9p36
  41. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics, use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah
  42. Lewis, G. B., Palm, R., & Feng, B. (2019). Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 793-821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1512261
  43. Li, C., & Monroe, M. C. (2018). Development and validation of the climate change hope scale for high school students. Environment and Behavior, 50(4), 454-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517708325
  44. Li, C. J., & Monroe, M. C. (2019). Exploring the essential psychological factors in fostering hope concerning climate change. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 936-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1367916
  45. Lopez, J. J. D., & Malay, C. A. (2019). Awareness and attitude towards climate change of selected senior high students in Cavite, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2 Part III), 56-62.
  46. MacGregor, S. (2010). ‘Gender and climate change’: from impacts to discourses. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 6(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2010.536669
  47. Maartensson, H., & Loi, N. M. (2022). Exploring the relationship between risk perception, behavioural willingness, and constructive hope in pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 28(4), 600-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2015295
  48. McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
  49. McCright, A. M., & Xiao, C. (2014). Gender and environmental concern: Insights from recent work and for future research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(10), 1109-1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.918235
  50. McGeer, V. (2004). The art of good hope. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592, 100-127.
  51. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (6th ed.). New York, Pearson Education.
  52. Michail, S., Stamou, A. G., & Stamou, G. P. (2007). Greek primary school teachers' understanding of current environmental issues: An exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91(2), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20185
  53. Mitchell, J. F. B. (1989). The “Greenhouse” effect and climate change. Reviews of Geophysics, 27(1), 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG027i001p00115
  54. Mohai, P. (1997). Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Race, Gender & Class, 5(1), 153-169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41674853
  55. Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender difference in Egytian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
  56. Moulden, H. M., & Marshall, W. L. (2005). Hope in the treatment of sexual offenders: The potential application of hope theory. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160512331316361
  57. Nicholls, J. A. (2016). Understanding how Queensland teachers' views on climate change and climate change education shape their reported practices [Doctoral dissertation, James Cook University].
  58. Ojala, M. (2012a). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157
  59. Ojala, M. (2012b). Regulating worry, promoting hope: How do children, adolescents, and young adults cope with climate change? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 537–561.
  60. Ojala, M. (2013). Emotional awareness: On the importance of including emotional aspects in education for sustainable development (ESD). Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 7(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408214526488
  61. Ojala, M. (2015). Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662
  62. Ojala, M. (2017). Hope and anticipation in education for a sustainable future. Futures, 94, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.10.004
  63. Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 181-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916501332002
  64. Ratinen, I., & Uusiautti, S. (2020). Finnish students’ knowledge of climate change mitigation and its connection to hope. Sustainability, 12(6), 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030103
  65. Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children's Geographies, 18(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1614532
  66. Schahn, J., & Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior 22(6), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916590226003
  67. Singh, B. R. & Singh, O. (2012). Study of impacts of global warming on climate change: Rise in sea level and disaster frequency. In B. R. Singh (Eds.), Global warming: Impacts and future perspective (pp. 93-117). IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org.10.5772/50464
  68. Snyder, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope. New York: Free Press.
  69. Snyder, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(3), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x
  70. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01
  71. Snyder, C. R., Ilardi, S. S., Cheavens, J., Michael, S. T., Yamhure, L., & Sympson, S. (2000). The role of hope in cognitive-behavior therapies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(6), 747-762. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005547730153
  72. Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). “Hope and Health.” In Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective, edited by C. R. Snyder and D. R. Forsyth, 285–305. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
  73. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Shorey, H. S., Rand, K. L., & Feldman, D. B. (2003). Hope theory, measurements, and applications to school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.122.21854
  74. Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., King, E. A., Feldman, D. B., & Woodward, J. T. (2002). “False” hope. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1003-1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10096
  75. Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon D. R. (2001). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In Snyder C. R. & Lopez S. J. (Eds). Handbook of Positive Psychology, (pp. 257–276). Oxford University Press.
  76. Stevenson, K., & Peterson, N. (2016). Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding despair among adolescents. Sustainability, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010006
  77. Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). What is climate change education?. Curriculum Perspectives, 37, 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9
  78. Strapko, N., Hempel, L., MacIlroy, K., & Smith, K. (2016). Gender differences in environmental concern: Reevaluating gender socialization. Society & Natural Resources, 29(9), 1015-1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1138563
  79. Sundström, A., & McCright, A. M. (2014). Gender differences in environmental concern among Swedish citizens and politicians. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 1082-1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.921462
  80. Swim, J. K., & Fraser, J. (2013). Fostering hope in climate change educators. Journal of Museum Education, 38(3), 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2013.11510781
  81. Tikka, P.M., Kuitunen, M.T., & Tynys, S.M. (2000). Effect of educational background on students’ attitude, activity levels and knowledge concerning environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 12-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598640
  82. Tolppanen, S., Claudelin, A., & Kang, J. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of the impact of mitigative climate actions and their willingness to act. Research in Science Education, 51, 1629-1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09921-1
  83. Tucci, J., Mitchell, J., & Goddard, C. (2007). Children’s fears, hopes and heroes: Modern childhood in Australia. Australian Childhood Foundation
  84. Twain, M. (n.d.). Overview: Weather, global warming and climate change. https://climate.nasa.gov/resources/global-warming-vs-climate-change/
  85. van Zomeren, M., Pauls, I. L., & Cohen-Chen, S. (2019). Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion-and problem-focused coping functions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.003
  86. Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sáinz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2013). Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
  87. Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population and Environment, 32, 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0115-z
  88. Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2012). Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 25(11), 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.651191