SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 01

Prof. Dr. Şeref Gözübüyük Hocamızın Anısına

Celal GÖLE
Pages
3–35
Publication Date
2006-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With respect to these notions, the place of societies in ecological thoughtis needed to be determinedin an accUfate way

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ecologicalsocietyis the own designof an ecologicalthought.The organicsocietyplays animportant role on the considerationto the interrelationship.some notions, the relationshipbetween an ecological society and an organic society is appraised as a longingfor going back to primitivesocieties.However,accordingto ecologicalthought,going back to primitivesocities necd not be even discussed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ecologicalsocietyis the own designof an ecologicalthought.The organicsocietyplays animportant role on the considerationto the interrelationship.some notions, the relationshipbetween an ecological society and an organic society is appraised as a longingfor going back to primitivesocieties.However,accordingto ecologicalthought,going back to primitivesocities necd not be even discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With respect to these notions, the place of societies in ecological thoughtis needed to be determinedin an accUfate way
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ekolojik düşünce · çevre korumacı lık · ekolojik toplum

Abstract

Ecologicalsocietyis the own designof an ecologicalthought.The organicsocietyplays animportant role on the considerationto the interrelationship.some notions, the relationshipbetween an ecological society and an organic society is appraised as a longingfor going back to primitivesocieties.However,accordingto ecologicalthought,going back to primitivesocities necd not be even discussed. With respect to these notions, the place of societies in ecological thoughtis needed to be determinedin an accUfate way

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖLE, C. (2006). Prof. Dr. Şeref Gözübüyük Hocamızın Anısına. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 01, 3–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/10608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. BAHRO, Rudolph (1996), Nasıl Sosyalizm? Hangi Yeşil? Niçin Tinsellik?(istanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları) (Gen. 2. Basım, çev. T. Bora). BARFIELD, Thomas (2002), The Dictionaryof Anthropology (Oxford:Blackwell Publishing). BiRiKiM (1994), "Ekoloji-Bilim BOOKCHIN, Murray (1994), Özgürlüğün Ekolojisi(IstanbuL: Ayrıntı Yayınları)(Çev.A. Türker). ilişkisi Üzerine Tartışmalar", (Ocak-Şubat):35-38.
  2. BOOKCHIN, Murray(1996a),Ekolojik Bir ToplumaDoğru (istanbul: AyrıntıYayınları) (Çev. A. Yılmaz). BOOKCHIN,Murray (1996b), Toplumsal Ekoloji'nin Felsefesi (istanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi) (Çev.R.G. Öğdül). BOOKCHIN, Murray (1999a), Toplumu Yeniden Kurmak (istanbul: Metis Yayınları)(Çev. K. Şahin). BOOKCHIN, Murray (1999b), Kentsiz Kentleşme(istanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları)(Çev. B. Özyalçın). BOWIE, Fiona (2003), The Anthropology of Religion (Oxford: BlackwellPublishing ltd). BRAMWEll,Anna (1989), Ecology in the 20th Century:A History(New Haven and london: Yale University Press). CHODORKOFF, Daniel (2002), "KalkınmayıYeniden Tanımlamak," 117. Özgür Üniversite Forumu(S.19, Temmuz-Eylül): COUPE, laurence (2000),Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism (Florence: Routledge). DANEK,David (2002), roportaj.html/170402, http://uk.geocities.com/ anarsistbakis/makaleler/bookchin. (17.04.2002).
  3. DANSEREAU, Pierre (1984), "Çevrebilim veinsanEtkisinin Artışı," Yerleşim Derneği) (Yay. Sorunlan: Keleş),136-159. (Türk SosyalBilimler Haz. R. DElANEY,Carol (2004), Investigatin Culture: An Experiential Introduction to Anthropology (Oxford:BlackwellPublishing). DIAKONOFF, Igor (1999), Paths of History(Port Chester: Cambridge UniversityPress). ENGELS, Friedrich (1998),
  4. Ailenin, Özel Mülkiyetın ve Devletin Kökeni (Ankara:Sol Yayınları) (11.Baskı, Çev. K. Somer). FOSTER, J. Bellamy (2002), Savunmasız Gezegen (Ankara: Epos Yayınları)(Çev. H. Ünder). GORZ, Andre(1995),"SiyasalEkoloji: Uzmanerkine Karşı Özsınırlama," Birikim (Aralık-Ocak ) (2. Baskı): 111-119.
  5. GÖRMEZ, Kemal (2003), Çevre Sorunlanve Türkiye (Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi)(Üçüncü Baskı). HARRIS, Marvin(1995),
  6. Inekler, Domuzlar,Savaşlar ve Cadılar: KültürBilmeceleri (Ankara imge Kitabevi)(Çev. M.F. Gümüş). (1999), (Florence:Routledge Press). for Nature: A Crtitique ofEnvironmental Philosophy KOTTAK,Conrad Phillip (2001), Antropoloji: InsanÇeşitliliğine BirBakış(Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları). LANGANEY, Andre; ClOTTES, Jean; GUlLAINE, Jean; SIMONNET, Dominique (2000),Insanın En Güzel Tarihi(istanbul:iş Bankası Yayınları)(Çev: E. Çaykara). MALINOWS