SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Economics / 2025 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL RISK, TRADE DEFICIT, AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON CARBON EMISSIONS: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Zeliha Semra Kılınç(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9837-1587
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that electricity consumption increases emissions in both the short and long run, while income contributes to emission growth, particularly in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the key determinants of carbon emissions in Turkey using data from the period 1995–2023.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings indicate that electricity consumption increases emissions in both the short and long run, while income contributes to emission growth, particularly in the long run.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the design of energy security policies should take into account the potential influence of geopolitical uncertainties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:geopolitical risk · energy consumption · carbon emissions

Abstract

This paper examines the key determinants of carbon emissions in Turkey using data from the period 1995–2023. The primary objective is to reveal the impacts of the geopolitical risk index, trade openness, energy consumption, and income levels on emissions. To jointly assess the short- and long-run relationships, the ARDL approach is employed. The findings indicate that electricity consumption increases emissions in both the short and long run, while income contributes to emission growth, particularly in the long run. The trade deficit exhibits a complex relationship, showing both mitigating and aggravating effects in different periods. Geopolitical risk has a limited direct impact on emissions and does not play as pronounced a role as energy and trade channels. The results emphasize the importance of reducing the carbon intensity of energy production and consumption, implementing energy efficiency policies, and adopting low-carbon strategies in foreign trade to mitigate emissions. Furthermore, the design of energy security policies should take into account the potential influence of geopolitical uncertainties.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılınç, Z. S. (2025). THE IMPACT OF GEOPOLITICAL RISK, TRADE DEFICIT, AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON CARBON EMISSIONS: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Journal of Research in Economics, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1060277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Adebayo, T. S., Saint Akadiri, S., Riti, J. S., & Odu, A. T. (2023). Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and its implication on climate change in India. Energy & Environment, 34(5), 1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221083236
  2. Adedoyin, F. F., Adams, S., Olaniran, E., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Energy consumption, economic policy uncertainty and carbon emissions: Causality evidence from resource rich economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.012
  3. Anser, M. K., Syed, Q. R., Lean, H. H., Alola, A. A., & Ahmad, M. (2021a). Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk lead to environmental degradation? Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(11), 5866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115866
  4. Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Khan, M. A., Zaman, K., & Nassani, A. A. (2021b). Does geopolitical risk escalate CO₂ emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48011–48021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.021.14032-z
  5. Aydın, Ş., Öztutuş, F., & Polat, İ. H. (2024). The impact of financial development, foreign direct investment and geopolitical risk on CO₂ emissions: Evidence from Turkey. Fiscaoeconomia, 8(1), 1–24. https:// doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1377785
  6. Bhayana, S., & Nag, B. (2024). Global value chain linkages and carbon emissions embodied in trade: Evidence from emerging economies: Uncovering connections. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.02963. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.02963
  7. Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194– 1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
  8. Cheng, P., Xingang, H., & Choi, B. (2023). The effect of geopolitical risk on carbon emissions: Influence mechanisms and heterogeneity analyzed using evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(48), 105220–105230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.023.29829-3
  9. Chu, L. K., Doğan, B., Abakah, E. J. A., Ghosh, S., & Albeni, M. (2023). Impact of economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and economic complexity on carbon emissions and ecological footprint: an investigation of the E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 34406–34427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.022.24682-2
  10. Çoban, O. (2015). Yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve karbon emisyonu ilişkisi: Turkey örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(38), 195–208.
  11. Derindag, O. F., Maydybura, A., Kalra, A., Wong, W. K., & Chang, B. H. (2023). Carbon emissions and the rising effect of trade openness and foreign direct investment: Evidence from a threshold regression model. Heliyon, 9(7), e17448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17448
  12. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  13. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. Brussels: European Commission.
  14. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Brussels: European Commission.
  15. Hashmi, S. M., Bhowmik, R., Inglesi‑Lotz, R., & Syed, Q. R. (2022). Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 24049–24062. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356.021.17488-1
  16. Hu, W., Shan, Y., Deng, Y., Fu, N., Duan, J., Jiang, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). Geopolitical Risk Evolution and Obstacle Factors of Countries along the Belt and Road and Its Types Classification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021618
  17. Huang, Y., Kuldasheva, Z., & Salahodjaev, R. (2021). Renewable energy and CO₂ emissions: empirical evidence from major energy-consuming countries. Energies, 14(22), 7504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ en14227504
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
  19. Jiang, Y., & Khan, H. (2023). The relationship between renewable energy consumption, technological innovations, and carbon dioxide emission: Evidence from two‑step system GMM. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4187–4202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.022.22391-4
  20. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  21. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
  22. Kang, H. (2021). CO₂ emissions embodied in international trade and economic growth: Empirical evidence for OECD and non‑OECD countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 12114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132112114
  23. Kızılkaya, F., Kızılkaya, O., & Mike, F. (2024). Does geopolitical risk escalate environmental degradation in Turkey? Evidence from a Fourier approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10668.024.05258-1
  24. Lawal, G. O., Aladenika, B., Akadiri, A., Fatigun, A. S., & Olanrewaju, V. O. (2023). Geopolitical risk, globalization and environmental degradation in South Africa: Evidence from advanced quantiles approach. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.22
  25. Luo, H., & Sun, Y. (2024). Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 10747. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598.024.47166-7
  26. Mirziyoyeva, Z., & Salahodjaev, R. (2023). Renewable energy, GDP and CO₂ emissions in high‑globalized countries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, Article 1123269. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fenrg.2023.112.3269
  27. Mukhtarov, S., Aliyev, F., Aliyev, J., & Ajayi, R. (2023). Renewable energy consumption and carbon emissions: Evidence from an oil‑rich economy. Sustainability, 15(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010134
  28. Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). Trade liberalization and economic growth in Fiji: An empirical assessment using the ARDL approach. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96–115. https:// doi.org/10.1080/135.478.6042000309092
  29. Özokcu, S., & Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059
  30. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., ve Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  31. Riti, J. S., Shu, Y., & Riti, M. K. J. (2022). Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference. Energy Policy, 166, 113010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2022.113010
  32. Saadaoui, Z., Doğan, E., & Omri, A. (2023). Does geopolitical risk affect CO₂ emissions in Turkey? ARDL and spectral causality analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 36975–36988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356.023.36975-36988
  33. Sharifi-Renani, H. (2007). Demand for money in Iran: An ARDL approach. MPRA, 1-9 Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Uddin, I., Usman, M., Saqib, N., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2023). The impact of geopolitical risk, governance, technological innovations, energy use, and foreign direct investment on CO₂ emissions in the BRICS region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 73714–73729. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356.023.27466-4
  35. Yesbolova, A. Y., Abdulova, T., Nurgabylov, M., Yessenbekova, S., Turalina, S., Baytaeva, G., & Myrzabekkyzy, K. (2024). Analysis of the effect of renewable energy consumption and industrial production on CO₂ emissions in Turkic Republics by panel data analysis method. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(1), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15261
  36. Zhao, W., et al. (2021). Nonlinear effects of geopolitical risk on carbon emissions: New evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 39668–39679. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356.021.13505-5
  37. Wang, K. H., Kan, J. M., Jiang, C. F., & Su, C. W. (2022). Is geopolitical risk powerful enough to affect carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(13), 7867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14137867
  38. World Bank. (2024). Trade (net exports of goods and services % of GDP) – Turkey. Retrieved July 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS?locations=TR
  39. World Bank. (2024). Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption) – Turkey. Retrieved July 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS?locations=TR
  40. World Bank. (2024). GDP (constant 2015 US$) – Turkey. Retrieved July 2025, from https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD?locations=TR