SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

First data on the geochemistry of fluvial deposits of Çaybağı and Palu formations (Eastern Elazığ, Turkey)

Çaybağı ve Palu formasyonu akarsu yataklarının jeokimyasına ait ilk bulgular (Elazığ’ın Doğusu, Türkiye)

Dicle Bal Akkoca
İsmail Yıldırım
Mehmet Ali Ertürk
Pages
527–537
Publication Date
2018-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

La/Sc, Ti/Zr oranları örneklerin okyanus adayayı ortamında depolanmış kayaçlardan türediğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Normal 0 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:TR;} Bu çalışmada Elazığ’ın doğusundaki Çaybağı ve Palu Formasyonu’na ait fluvial çökellerin jeokimyası (majör, iz ve nadir toprak elementler) incelenmiştir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Zr/Sc ve Th/Sc oranı arasında önemli pozitif korelasyonun görülmesi örneklerin önemli bir sedimanter çevrime maruz kalmadığını göstermektedir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:La/Sc, Ti/Zr oranları örneklerin okyanus adayayı ortamında depolanmış kayaçlardan türediğini göstermektedir.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Elazığ · Akarsu yatakları · Jeokimya

Özet

Normal 0 false false false TR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normal Tablo"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:TR;} Bu çalışmada Elazığ’ın doğusundaki Çaybağı ve Palu Formasyonu’na ait fluvial çökellerin jeokimyası (majör, iz ve nadir toprak elementler) incelenmiştir. İnceleme alanının temel kayaçlarını Guleman Grubu, Elazığ Magmatitleri, Hazar-Maden Grubu, Elazığ Magmatit’lerinden malzeme almış olan Kırkgeçit Formasyonu oluşturmaktadır. Çaybağı Formasyonu kalın fluvial-lakustrin sedimanter istiften, Palu Formasyonu alüvyon yelpazesi, örgülü nehir çökelleri, lakustrin sedimanlardan oluşmaktadır. Örnekler Hacısamdere-Çaybağı kesiti (Ç örnekleri) ve Hacısamdere-Palu kesiti (PL örnekleri) boyunca Çaybağı ve Palu Formasyonları’nın nehir çökellerinden alınmıştır. Zr/Sc ve Th/Sc oranı arasında önemli pozitif korelasyonun görülmesi örneklerin önemli bir sedimanter çevrime maruz kalmadığını göstermektedir. Çaybağı ve Palu örneklerinin benzer jeokimyasal indisleri (Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 , Ti/Zr, La/Th, La/Sc, Cr/Th, Co/Th, (La/Yb) N , (Gd/Yb) N , LREE/HREE oranları), bunların nötr-bazik kaynak kayaçlarından türediğini göstermektedir., Si’a karşı Na/K diyagramında örnekler yay alanına düşmektedir. La/Sc, Ti/Zr oranları örneklerin okyanus adayayı ortamında depolanmış kayaçlardan türediğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akkoca, D. B., Yıldırım, İ., Ertürk, M. A. (2018). First data on the geochemistry of fluvial deposits of Çaybağı and Palu formations (Eastern Elazığ, Turkey). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 527–537. https://ajindex.com/articles/1058780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Lee YI, Verma SP, Ramasamy S. “Geochemistry of sandstones from the upper Miocene Kudankulam Formation, Southern India: Implications for provenance, weathering, and tectonic setting. “Journal of Sedimentary Research, 74(2), 285-297, 2004.
  2. Jafarzadeh M, Hosseini-Barzi M.“Petrography and geochemistry of Ahwaz Sandstone Member of Asmari Formation, Zagros, Iran: implications on provenance and tectonic setting”. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas Journal, 25, 247-260, 2008.
  3. Absar, N, Raza, M, Roy, M, Naqvi, SM, Roy AK. “Composition and weathering conditions of Palaeoproterozoic upper crust of Bundelkhand Craton, Central India: Records from geochemistry of clastic sediments of 1.9 Ga Gwalior Group”. Precambrian Research, 168, 313–329. 2009.
  4. Chakrabarti R, Basu AR, Santo AP, Tedesco D, Vaselli O. “Isotopic and Geochemical study of the Nyiragongo and Nyamuragira volcanics in the western rift of the East African rift system”. Chemical Geology, 259, 273-289,2009.
  5. Hossain HMZ, Tarek M, Armstrong-Altrin JS, Monir MU, Ahmed MT, Ahmed SI, Hernandez-Coronado CJ. “Microtextures of detrital sand grains from the Cox’s Bazar beach, Bangladesh: Implications for provenance and depositional environment”. Carpathian Journal of Earth And Environmental Sciences, 9, 187-197, 2014.
  6. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagarajan R, Lee YI, Kasper-Zubillaga JJ, Córdoba-Saldaña LP. “Geochemistry of sands along the San Nicolas and San Carlos beaches, Gulf of California Mexico: implications for provenance and tectonic setting”. Journal of Earth Sciences-Academic, 23, 533–558, 2014.
  7. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Machain-Castillo ML, Rosales-Hoz L, Carranza-Edwards A, Sanchez-Cabeza JA, Ruíz-Fernández AC. “Provenance and depositional history of continental slope sediments in the southwestern. Gulf of Mexic.o unraveled by geochemical analysis”. Continental Shelf Research, 95,15-26, 2015.
  8. Armstrong-Altrin JS, Nagarajan R, Balaram V, Natalhy-Pineda O. “Petrography and geochemistry of sands from the Chachalacasand Veracruz beach areas, western Gulf of Mexico, Mexico: constraintson provenance and tectonic setting”. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 64, 199-216, 2015.
  9. Bahatia MR, Crook KAW. “Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins”. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 92, 181-193, 1986.
  10. Roser BP, Korsch RJ. “Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major-element data”. Chemical Geology, 67, 119-139, 1988.
  11. Dabard MP. “Lower Brioverian formations (Upper Proterozoic) of the Armonican Massif (France): Geodynamic evolution of source areas revealed by sandstone petrography and geochemistry”. Sedimentary Geology, 69, 45-58, 1990.
  12. McLennan SM. “Weathering and global denudation”. The Journal of Geology, 101, 295-303, 1993.
  13. Dostal J, Keppie JD. “Geochemistry of low-grade clastic rocks in the Acatlán Complex of southern Mexico: evidence for local provenance in felsic-intermediate igneous rocks”. Sedimentary Geology, 222 (3-4), 241-253, 2009.
  14. Yalçın H, Bozkaya Ö. “Sepiolite-palygorskite from the Hekimhan region (Turkey)”. Clays and Clay Minerals, 43(6), 705-717, 1995.
  15. Yalçın H, Bozkaya Ö. “Kangal-Çetinkaya alt baseni (Sivas baseni) gölsel paligorskitlerinin mineralojisi ve jeokimyası”. VII. Ulusal Kil Sempozyumu, MTA, Ankara, Türkiye, 27-30 Eylül 1995.
  16. Cullers RL. “The geochemistry of shales, siltstones and sandstones of Pennsylvanian-Permian age, Colorado, USA: Implications for provenance and metamorphic studies”. Lithos, 51, 181–203, 2000.
  17. Nyakairu GWA, Christian K. “Mineralogical and chemical composition and distribution of rare earth elements in clay-rich sediments from central Uganda”. Geochemical Journal, 35, 13-28, 2001.
  18. Bozkaya O, Yalçın H, Kozlu H. “Clay mineralogy of the Paleozoic–Lower Mesozoic sedimentary sequence from the northern part of the Arabian Platform, Hazro (Diyarbakır), Southeast Anatolia”. Geologica Carpathica, 62, 489-500, 2011.
  19. Saydam Eker Ç, Korkmaz S. "Mineralogy and whole Rock geochemistry of Late Cretaceous sandstones from the Eastern Pontides (Ne Turkey)". Neues Jahrbuch Fur Mineralogie-Abhandlungen, 188, 235-256, 2011.
  20. Saydam Eker Ç. “Petrography and geochemistry of Eocene sandstones from Eastern Pontides (NE Turkey): Implications for source area weathering, provenance and tectonic setting”. Geochemistry International, 50(8), 683-701, 2012.
  21. McLennan SM, Taylor SR, Kroner A. “Geochemical evolution of Archean shales from South Africa. I. The Swaziland and Pongola Supergroups”. Precambrian Research, 22, 93-124, 1983.
  22. Perinçek, D., Özkaya, İ. “Arabistan levhası kuzey kenarı tektonik evrimi”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü Bülteni, 8, 91- 101, 1981.
  23. Özkul M. Güneyçayırı (Elazığ) Bölgesinin Sedimantolojisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye, 1982.
  24. Sungurlu O, Perinçek D, Kurt G, Tuna E, Dülger S, Çelikdemir E, Naz H. “Elazığ-Palu alanının jeolojisi”. T.C. Petrol İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Dergisi, 29, 83-190, 1985.
  25. Çetindağ B. Elazığ, Palu-Kovancılar dolayının hidrojeoloji incelemesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, Türkiye, 1985.
  26. Türkmen İ. “Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Çaybağı formation (Upper Miocene-Pliocene?) in the east of Elazığ”. Geological Bulletin of Turkey, 34, 45-53, 1991.
  27. Koç Taşgın C, Türkmen İ. “Analysis of soft-sediment deformation structures in Neogene fluvio-lacustrine deposits of Çaybağı formation, Eastern Turkey”. Sedimentary Geology, 218, 16-30, 2009.
  28. Akkoca Bal D, Sağıroğlu A. “The authigenic dolomite and smectite formations in the Neogene lacustrine-fluvial Çaybağı basin (Elazığ Eastern Turkey)”. Geologica Carpathica, 56(6), 531-543, 2005.
  29. Kerey İE, Türkmen İ. “Palu Formasyonu’nun (Pliyosen-Kuvaterner) sedimantolojik özellikleri. Elazığ doğusu”. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 34, 21-26, 1991.
  30. Çolak, S, Aksoy, E, Koçyiğit, A, İnceöz, M. “The Palu-Uluova strike-slip basin in the east anatolian fault system, Turkey: Its transition from the Palaeotectonic to Neotectonic stage”. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 21, 547–570, 2012.
  31. Yazgan, E, Chessex, R. “Geology and tectonic evolution of the Southeastern Taurides in the Region of Malatya”. Turkish Association of Petroleum Geologists, 3, 1-42,1991.
  32. Robertson AHF. “Overview of the genesis and emplacement of Mesozoic ophiolites in the Eastern Mediterranean Tethyan region”. Lithos, 65, 1-67, 2002.
  33. Dönmez C. Soğanlı-Uyandık (Elazığ) Arasında Yüzeyleyen Elazığ Magmatitleri’nin, Jeolojisi, Petrografisi ve Jeokimyası. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, Türkiye, 2006.
  34. Bingöl, A.F. “Petrographical and petrological features of the intrusive rocks of Yüksekova Complex in the Elazığ region (Eastern Taurus-Turkey)”. Journal of Fırat University, 3(2), 1-17, 1988.
  35. Yazgan, E. Geodynamics Evolution of the Eastern Taurus Region. Editors: Tekeli O., Göncüoğlu M.C. Geology of the Taurus Belt, 199-208, Ankara, Türkiye, MTA, 1984.
  36. Avşar N. Elazığ Yakın Kuzeybatısında Stratigrafik ve Mikropaleontolojik Araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, Türkiye, 1983.
  37. Yiğitbaş, E, Yılmaz, Y. “New evidence and solution to the Maden complex controversy of the the Southeast Anatolian orogenic belt (Turkey)”. International Geology Review, 38(9), 818-831, 1996.
  38. Aktaş G, Robertson AHF. The Maden Complex, SE Turkey: Evolution of a Neotethyan Continental Margin. Editors: Dixon JE, Robertson AHF. The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. 375-402, England, Geological Society London, 1984
  39. Çelik, H. “Mastar Dağı (Elazığ GD'su) Çevresinin Stratigrafik ve Tektonik Özellikleri. Doktora Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, Türkiye, 2003.
  40. Çelik H. “The effects of linear coarse-grained slope channel bodies on the orientations of fold developments: a case study from the middle Eocene-lower Oligocene Kırkgeçit Formation, Elazığ, Eastern Turkey”. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 22, 320-338, 2013.
  41. Türkmen, I. Palu-Çaybağı (Elazığ doğusu) yöresinin sedimantolojik incelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, Türkiye, 1988.
  42. Koç Taşgin, C, Türkmen, İ. “Analysis of soft-sediment deformation structures in Neogene fluvio-lacustrine deposits of Çaybağı formation, Eastern Turkey”. Sedimentary Geology, 218, 16-30, 2009.
  43. Herron M. “Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales from core or log data”. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 58(5), 820-829, 1988.
  44. Taylor SR, McLennan SM. The Continental Crust; Its Composition and Evolution; An Examination of the Geochemical Record Preserved in Sedimentary Rocks. 1 nd ed. Oxford, UK, Blackwell publishing, 1985.
  45. Feng R, Kerrich R.“Geochemistry of fine grained clastic sediments in the Archaean Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Canada: Implications for provenance and tectonic setting”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 54, 1061-1081, 1990.
  46. Mohamed FH, Hassanen MA. “Geochemical evolution of arc-related mafic plutonism in the Umm Naggat district, Eastern Desert of Egypt”. Journal of African Earth Science, 22(3), 269-283, 1996.
  47. Akarish AIM, El-Gohary AM. “Provenance and source area weathering derived from the geochemistry of pre-cenomanian sandstones, east sinai, Egypt”. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(17), 3070-3088, 2011.
  48. Ma L, Jin L, Brantley SL. “Geochemical behaviors of different element groups during shale weathering at the susquehanna/shale hills critical zone observatory”. Applied Geochemistry, 26, 89-93, 2011.
  49. Mishira M, Sen S. “Provenance, tectonic setting and source-area weathering of Mesoproterozoic Kaimur Group, Vindhyan Supergroup, Central India”. Geologica Acta, 10(3), 283-293, 2012.
  50. Miladowsky AE, Zalasiewicz JA. “Redistribution of rare-earth elements during diagenesis of turbidite/hemipelagite mudrock sequences of Llandovery age from central Wales”. Geological Society Special Publication, 57, 101-124, 1991.
  51. Coppin F, Berger G, Bauer A, Castet S, Loubet M. “Sorption of lanthanides on smectite and kaolinite”. Chemical Geology, 182, 57-68, 2002.
  52. McDonough WF, Sun SS.” Composition of the Earth”. Chemical Geology, 120, 223-253, 1995.
  53. Al-Juboury AI, AH, AL-Hadidy. “Petrology and depositional evolution of the paleozoic rocks of Iraq”. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26, 208-231, 2009.
  54. Armstrong-Altrin, JS.”Provenance of sands from Cazones, Acapulco, and Bahía Kino beaches”. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 26(3), 764-782, 2009.
  55. Garzanti E, Al-Juboury AI, Zoleikhaei Y, Vermeesch P, Jotheri J. Akkoca DB, Obaid AK, Allen MB, Andó S, Limonta M, Padoan M, Resentini A, Resentini A, Rittner M, Vezzoli G. “The Euphrates-Tigris-Karun river system: Provenance, recycling anddispersal of quartz-poor foreland-basin sediments in arid climate”. Earth-Science Reviews, 162, 107-128, 2016.
  56. Wronkiewicz, DJ, Condie KC. “Geochemistry and mineralogy of sediments from the Ventersdorp and Transvaal Supergroups, South Africa: cratonic evolution during the early Proterozoic”. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 54, 343–354,1990.
  57. Hayashi KI, Fujisawa H, Holland HD, Ohmoto H.“Geochemistry of ~1.9 Ga sedimentary rocks from northeastern Labrador, Canada”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 61, 4115-4137, 1997.
  58. Bhatia MR, Taylor SR. Trace-element geochemistry and sedimentary provinces: a study from the Tasman geosyncline, Australia”. Chemical Geology,33, 115-125, 1981.
  59. González-López, JM., Bauluz, B, Fernandez-Nieto C, Oliete, A.Y.”Factors controlling the trace-element distribution in fine-grained rocks: the Albian kaolinite-rich deposits of the Oliete Basin (NE Spain)”. Chemical Geology, 214, 1-19. 2005.
  60. Nance WB, Taylor SR. “Rare-earth element patterns and crustal evolution Australian Post-Archean sedimentary-rocks”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 40(12), 539-551, 1976.
  61. Campoa M. D, Guevarab SR. “Provenance analysis and tectonic setting of late Neoproterozoic metasedimentary successions in NW Argentina”. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 19, 143-153,2005.
  62. Sun SS, McDonough WF. “Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts; implications for mantle composition and processes. In: Magmatism in the ocean basins”. Geological Society of London, 42, 313-341, 1989.
  63. Cullers RL, Graf J. “Rare earth elements in igneous rocks of the continental crust: intermediate and silicic rocks, ore petrogenesis”. Rare-Earth Geochemistry, 2, 275-312, 1983.
  64. Cullers RL.”The controls on the major- and trace-element evolution of shales, siltstones and sandstones of Ordovician to Tertiary age in wet mountains region, Colorado, USA”. Chemical. Geology, 123, 107-131,1995.
  65. Cullers RL. “Implications of elemental concentrations for provenance, redox conditions, and metamorphic studies of shales and limestones near Pueblo, CO, USA”. Chemical Geology, 191(4), 305-327, 2002.
  66. Condie KC. “Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: contrasting results from surface samples and shales”. Chemical Geology, 104, 1-37,1993.
  67. Dönmez C. Geology, Petrography and Geochemistry of the Elazığ Magmatics Outcroping Between Soğanlı-Uyandık (Elazığ)], Çukurova Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adana, Türkiye, 2006.