✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
In this study, we propose some solutions for disciplinary courts.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:\r\n Disciplinary courts have established by law in conformity with the Constitution of 1982.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Disciplinary process in disciplinary courts have been examined in the light of the right to a fair trial.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, we propose some solutions for disciplinary courts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:disiplin mahkemeleri · adil yargılanma hakkı · askerî yargı
Abstract
\r\n Disciplinary courts have established by law in conformity with the Constitution of 1982. Disciplinary process in disciplinary courts have been examined in the light of the right to a fair trial. In this study, we propose some solutions for disciplinary courts.
Özet
\r\n Disiplin mahkemeleri, 1982 Anayasası’na uygun olarak kanunla kurulmuş mahkemelerdir. Söz konusu mahkemelerde yapılan yargılamalar, AİHS m.6’da yer alan adil yargılanma hakkı kapsamında incelenmiştir. Yapılan incelemede disiplin mahkemeleri ile ilgili çözüm önerilerine yer verilmiştir.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
DEĞİRMENCİ, O. (2020). Adil yargılanma hakkı bakımından disiplin mahkemeleri (avrupa insan hakları sözleşmesi madde 6). Kara Harp Okulu Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1042446