SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Kamu Yönetiminin Değişim Sürecinde Yönetsel Demokrasi

Ramazan Şengül
N. İşıl Çetinkaya
Pages
51–60
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the following chapter, relationship between public administration and administrative democracy, in the transition process from traditional administration to the present day, has been analyzed and foundings have been evaluated.\r\n

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:\r\n A change has been experiencing in public administrations's roles and their relations with society as a result of administrative reform policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Administrative democracy that includes citizens's active participation in administrative processes is the shared aim of administrative reforms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the following chapter, relationship between public administration and administrative democracy, in the transition process from traditional administration to the present day, has been analyzed and foundings have been evaluated.\r\n
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamu Yönetimi · Değişim · Yönetsel Demokrasi

Abstract

\r\n A change has been experiencing in public administrations's roles and their relations with society as a result of administrative reform policies. Administrative democracy that includes citizens's active participation in administrative processes is the shared aim of administrative reforms. This study examines administrative democracy which is an important axis of public administration's evolution process. The first chapter of the study is about, need for change in public administration and its dimensions. In the following chapter, relationship between public administration and administrative democracy, in the transition process from traditional administration to the present day, has been analyzed and foundings have been evaluated.\r\n

Özet

İdari reform politikalarının sonucu olarak kamu yönetimlerinin rollerinde ve toplumla olan ilişkilerinde değişim yaşanmaktadır. Vatandaşların yönetsel süreçlere aktif katılımını içeren yönetsel demokrasi idari reformların ortak hedefidir. Çalışma, kamu yönetiminin değişim sürecinin önemli bir ekseni olan yönetsel demokrasiyi incelemektedir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde kamu yönetiminin değişim gereği ve boyutları üzerinde durulmuştur. İzleyen bölümde ise geleneksel yönetimden günümüze kadar yaşanan değişim sürecinde kamu yönetimi ile yönetsel demokrasi ilişkisi analiz edilmiş ve elde edilen bulgular değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

Şengül, R., Çetinkaya, N. İ. (2012). Kamu Yönetiminin Değişim Sürecinde Yönetsel Demokrasi. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 51–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/1039244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Bouckaert, Geert. “La Réforme de la Gestion Publique Change-t-Elle Les Systémes Administratifs”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 105-106, 2003, 39-54.
  2. Başbakanlık, Değişimin Yönetimi İçin Yönetimde Değişim. Ankara, 2003.
  3. Chevallier, Jacques. “De L’administration Démocratique A La Démocratique Administrative”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, 217-227.
  4. Chevallier, Jacques. "La Transformation de La Relation Administrative: Mythe ou Réalité", Recueil Dalloz. 38, 2000, 575-584.
  5. Coglianese, Cary, Heather Kilmartin & Evan Mendelson, Transparency and Public Participation in the Rulemaking Process: A Nonpartisan Presidentia Transition Task Force Report. University of Pennsylvania Law School, 2008.
  6. Çukurçayır, M. Akif, Siyasal Katılma Ve Yerel Demokrasi. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi, 2002.
  7. Daugeron, Bruno. “La Démocratie Administrative Dans La Théorie du Droit Public: Retour Sur La Naissance d’un Concept”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, 21-37.
  8. Doğan, İlyas. "Yönetilenlere Katılım Yollarının Kısıtlanması Güçlü Devlet Anlamına Gelir mi?", Başbakanlık İdari Usul Kanunu Hazırlığı Sempozyumu Bildiriler, Ankara, 1998, ss.130-143.
  9. Eryılmaz, Bilal, Kamu Yönetimi. Ankara: Okutman Yayıncılık, 2011.
  10. Jacqué, Jean-Paul. “Le droit A Une Bone Administration Dans La Charte Des Droits Fondamentaux de L’Union Européenne”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, 79-83.
  11. King, Cheryl Simrell, Kathryn M. Feltey & Bridget O’Neill Susel. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration”, Public Administration Review. 58:4, 1998, 317-326.
  12. Le Clainche, Michel. “L’administration Consultative, Elément Constitutif ou Substitut de la Démocratie Administrative?”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, 39-48.
  13. Maisl, Herbert-Wiener & Céline-Woehrling Jean Marie. "Un Décret Ne Fais Pas Le Printemps", L'Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif. 3, 1984, 137-149.
  14. Mendes, Joana. “Transparence et Participation: Des Principes Démocratiques Pour L’administration de l’Union Européenne”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, ss.101-121.
  15. Mosher, Frederick C. “Democracy and the Public Service”, Representative Bureucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies, (Editör: Julie Dolan, David H. Rosenbloom), M.E.Sharp, New York, 2003, ss. 19-22.
  16. OCDE, Moderniser L’Etat la Route A Suivre. Paris: Editions OCDE, 2005.
  17. OCDE (2002), Des citoyens partenaires: information, consultation et participation à la formulation des politiques publiques (Gouvernance), Paris, http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/descitoyens-partenaires_9789264295568-fr, [İndirme Tarihi:10.07.2012].
  18. Poirot-Mazéres, Isabelle. “Conclusion Générale La Loi DCRA, Horizon İndépassable de La Relation Administrative?”, La Loi du 12 Avril 2000 Relative Aux Droits des Citoyens Dans Leurs Relations Avec Les Administrations…Dix Ans Aprés (Editör: Sébastien Saunier), L.G.D.J. Toulouse, 2011, ss.287-302.
  19. Rosenbloom, David H & Dolan Julie. "La Bureacratie Représentative", Revue Française d’Administration Publique, No:118, 2006, ss.251-263.
  20. Şengül, Ramazan. “Yeni Yerel Yönetim Kanunları Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Yerel Katılım”, Beşinci Uluslar arası Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, Kırgızistan, 2007, ss.1078-1087.
  21. Waintrop, Françoise. “Ecouter Les Usagers: De la Simplification A L’innovation”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 137-138, 2011, 209 215.
  22. Viguier, Jacques. “Vers La Démocratie Administrative”, içinde: Questions de Démocrate, (Editörler: Patrick Cabanel, Jean-Marc Fevrier), Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Touluse, 2000, ss.381-396.
  23. Wang, XiaoHu & Montgomery Wan Wart. “When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions”, Public Administration Review. 2007, 265 – 278.
  24. Warin, Philippe. “Les droits-créances aux usagers: rhapsodie de la réforme administrative”, Droit et Société. 51/52, 2002, 437-453, http://www.reds.msh paris.fr/publications/revue/pdf/ds51-52/ds051052-11.pdf, 16.07.2012.
  25. Ziller, Jacques. “Vrais et Faux Changements Dans Les Administrations En Europe”, Revue Française d’Administration Publique. 105-106, 2003, 67-79.
  26. Mosher, Frederick C. “Democracy and the Public Service”, Representative Bureucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies, (Editör: Julie Dolan, David H. Rosenbloom), M.E.Sharp, New York, 2003, ss. 19-22.
  27. OCDE (2002), Des citoyens partenaires: information, consultation et participation à la formulation des politiques publiques (Gouvernance), Paris, http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/governance/descitoyens-partenaires_9789264295568-fr, [İndirme Tarihi:10.07.2012].
  28. Warin, Philippe. “Les droits-créances aux usagers: rhapsodie de la réforme administrative”, Droit et Société. 51/52, 2002, 437-453, http://www.reds.msh paris.fr/publications/revue/pdf/ds51-52/ds051052-11.pdf, 16.07.2012.