Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

REEXAMINING THE TOURISM – GDP NEXUS IN TURKEY: A BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVE

REEXAMINING THE TOURISM – GDP NEXUS IN TURKEY: A BayesIan PERSPECTIVE

Pages
434–449
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While a non-informative (Jeffrey’s type) prior distribution is used, it is seen that tourism has enhancing effect on the GDP, but no significant effect is observed when inverted-gamma and multivariate prior distribution is used.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tourism sector is an important revenue, exchange and employment source for economies thanks to its forward and backward linkages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the 1980s, Turkey has invested in the tourism sector by adopting a tourism-led growth strategy, and consequently that has become one of the world's leading destinations. 1.1 million tourist came to Turkey in 1980 and revenues of $ 0.327 billion was created.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While a non-informative (Jeffrey’s type) prior distribution is used, it is seen that tourism has enhancing effect on the GDP, but no significant effect is observed when inverted-gamma and multivariate prior distribution is used.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:GSYH · Bayesyen analiz · Turizm

Abstract

Tourism sector is an important revenue, exchange and employment source for economies thanks to its forward and backward linkages. Due to these multifaceted impacts, countries are striving to develop the tourism sector and achieve a competitive advantage. Since the 1980s, Turkey has invested in the tourism sector by adopting a tourism-led growth strategy, and consequently that has become one of the world's leading destinations. 1.1 million tourist came to Turkey in 1980 and revenues of $ 0.327 billion was created. In 2018, the number of tourists increased to 45.8 million and tourism revenue to $ 34.5 billion. The strengthening of global tourism flows in time and the fact that the tourism sector became important for the economies led to an expansion in the analysis of the economic effects of the tourism sector. Most of the empirical studies on the subject are constitute from the demand function estimation and the effect of tourism on economic growth. In the available studies, classical (frequency) inference is the standard method has been applied. There has been no study in which Bayesian inference approach has been applied, which has become increasingly popular in recent years. This study aims to contribute to the literature by considering the impact of tourism on GDP in a Bayesian framework. The findings show that this relation is sensitive to the form of the prior distribution used. While a non-informative (Jeffrey’s type) prior distribution is used, it is seen that tourism has enhancing effect on the GDP, but no significant effect is observed when inverted-gamma and multivariate prior distribution is used.

Özet

Turizm sektörü, sahip olduğu ileri ve geri bağlantılar sayesinde ekonomiler için önemli bir gelir, döviz ve istihdam kaynağıdır. Bu çok yönlü etkileri nedeniyle ülkeler turizm sektörünü geliştirmek ve rekabet avantajı elde etmek için çabalamaktadırlar. Türkiye de, özellikle 1980’lerden itibaren turizme dayalı büyüme stratejisini benimseyerek sektöre büyük yatırımlar yapmış, bunun sonucunda da dünyanın önde gelen destinasyonlarından biri haline gelmiştir. 1980’de Türkiye’ye gelen 1,1 milyon turist 0,327 milyar $ gelir yaratırken 2018 yılında turist sayısı 45,8 milyona ve turizm geliri ise 34,5 milyar $’a yükselmiştir. Küresel turizm akımlarının zaman içinde oldukça güçlenmesi ve turizm sektörünün ekonomiler için önemli hale gelmesi, turizm sektörünün ekonomik etkilerine yönelik analizlerde de bir genişlemeye neden olmuştur. Konuyla ilgili ampirik çalışmaların çoğunu talep fonksiyonu tahmini ve turizmin büyümeye etkisi oluşturmaktadır. Mevcut çalışmalarda yöntemsel olarak hep klasik (frekansçı) çıkarsama yaklaşımına başvurulmuştur. Son yıllarda giderek daha popüler hale gelen Bayesyen çıkarsama yaklaşımının kullanıldığı bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma, turizmin GSYH’ye etkisini Bayesyen bir çerçevede ele alarak literatüre katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, sözkonusu ilişkinin kullanılan önsel dağılımın biçimine karşı duyarlı olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bilgi vermeyen (Jeffrey tipi) önsel dağılım kullanıldığında turizmin GSYH’yi artırıcı etkide bulunduğu görülürken, ters-gamma ve çok değişkenli önsel dağılım kullanıldığında anlamlı bir etki görülmemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖZ, K., ERGÜN, S. (2020). REEXAMINING THE TOURISM – GDP NEXUS IN TURKEY: A BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVE. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 434–449. https://ajindex.com/articles/103660

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Balaguer, J. and Cantavella-Jordá, M. (2002). “Tourism as a Long Run Economic Growth Factor: The Spanish Case”, Applied Economics, 34 (7), 877-884.
  2. Belloumi, M. (2010). “The Relationship between Tourism Receipts, Real Effective Exchange Rate and Economic Growth in Tunisia”, International Journal of Tourism Research, 12, 550–560.
  3. Brida, J. G. and Pullina, M. (2010). “A literature review on the tourism-led-growth hypothesis” (No. 2010/17). Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. Brida, J. G., Cortez-Jimenez, I. and Pullina, M. (2016). “Has the tourism-led-growth hypothesis been validated? A literature review”, Current Issues in Tourism, 19 (5), 394-430.
  4. Bouzahzah, M. and El Menyari, Y. (2013). “The Relationship between International Tourism and Economic Growth: The Case of Morocco and Tunisia”, MPRA Paper No. 44102. Cárdenas-García, P. J., Sánchez-Riandro, M. and Pulido-Fernández, J. I. (2015). “Does Tourism Growth Influence Economic Development?”, Journal of Travel Research, 54 (2), 206–221.
  5. Chou, M. C. (2013). “ Does Tourism Development Promote Economic Growth in Transition Countries? A Panel Data Analysis”, Economic Modelling, 33, 226–232.
  6. Comerio, N. and Strozzi, F. (2019). “Tourism Its Economic Impact: A Literature Review Using Bibliometric Tools”, Tourism Economics, 25 (1), 109-131.
  7. Cortes-Jimenez, I. and Pulina, M. (2010). “Inbound Tourism and Long-run Economic Growth”, Current Issues in Tourism, 13 (1), 61-74.
  8. Çağlayan, E., Şak, N. and Karymshakov, K. (2012). “Relationship Between Tourism and Economic Growth: A Panel Granger Causality Approach”, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2 (5), 591-602.
  9. Eeckels, B., Filis, G. and Leon, C. (2012). “Tourism Income and Economic Growth in Greece: Empirical Evidence From Their Cyclical Components”, Tourism Economics, 18 (4), 817–834.
  10. Eugenio-Martin, J. L., Morales, N. M. and Scarpa, R.(2004). “Tourism and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries: A Panel Data Approach”, FEEM Working Paper No. 26.2004.
  11. Fayissa, B., Nsiah, C. and Tadasse, B. (2008). “Impact of Tourism on Economic Growth and Development in Africa”, Tourism Economics, 14 (4), 807–818.
  12. Gwenhure, Y. and Odhiambo, N. M. (2017). “Tourism and Economic Growth: A Review of International Literature”, Tourism, 65 (1), 33-44.
  13. Holzner, M. (2010). “Tourism and Economic Development: the Beach Disease?”, WIIW Working Papers 66. Jaforullah, M. (2015). “International Tourism and Economic Growth in New Zealand”, U