Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 32

Japonlarin gözüyle “1453” - yamada torajirō ve istanbul’un fethi

Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-04-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This proves that the idea of generalizing one nation is a mistake. \r\n

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:\r\n To say that there was no other Japanese citizen like Yamada Torajirō, an individual who lived in Istanbul for many years and was involved in commercial life but also contributed to the promotion of Japanese-Turkish relationship somewhat an honorary consul before official relations actually began, is not an exaggeration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yamada recorded his observations and knowledge of 19th century Turkey in his book Toruko Gakan (A Pictoral Look at Turkey) and the popular magazine of that time, Taiyō, thus giving researchers the opportunity to examine his writings on the country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This proves that the idea of generalizing one nation is a mistake. \r\n
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yamada Torajirō · İstanbul’un Fethi · Toruko Gakan

Abstract

\r\n To say that there was no other Japanese citizen like Yamada Torajirō, an individual who lived in Istanbul for many years and was involved in commercial life but also contributed to the promotion of Japanese-Turkish relationship somewhat an honorary consul before official relations actually began, is not an exaggeration. Yamada recorded his observations and knowledge of 19th century Turkey in his book Toruko Gakan (A Pictoral Look at Turkey) and the popular magazine of that time, Taiyō, thus giving researchers the opportunity to examine his writings on the country. In these works, there is a distinguishable difference between the tone of his writings. In his account of general opinions of Turkey reflect his pro-Turkish feelings; on the other hand, his account of the conquest of Istanbul reflects only Western claims. Today, other Japanese scholars opinion on the conquest of Istanbul totally differs from Yamada’s. This proves that the idea of generalizing one nation is a mistake. \r\n

Özet

\r\n Türkiye’de Yamada Torajirō kadar uzun süre bulunarak başarılı bir ticari yaşam sürdürmekle kalmayıp Türkiye-Japonya arasındaki ilişkilerin resmi olarak başlamasından önce adeta fahri konsolos olarak görev yapan bir başka Japon vatandaşı daha yoktur denilse yanlış olmayacaktır. Yamada’nın Türkiye hakkında gözlem ve bilgilerinin Toruko Gakan (Türkiye’ye Resimlerle Bakış) adlı kitap ve Taiyō adlı dergide yayınlanmış olması, değer- lendirmelerini günümüzde somut belge üzerinden inceleme imkânı sunmaktadır. Bu yazı- larda Yamada’nın birincil elden edindiği Türkiye bilgileri ile geçmiş döneme ait bilgilerin sunumunda farklılık bulunduğu görülmektedir. Genel Türkiye izlenimlerinde nesnel bir tavır sergilerken, İstanbul’un fethi konusunda yazdıklarında Batı algısının etkisi hissedil- mektedir. Ancak günümüzde İstanbul’un fethi konusunu Yamada’dan farklı şekilde ele alan Japon akademisyenlerin bulunması, bir milleti genellemek hatadır görüşünü destekler.\r\n

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEMİR, A. V. (2020). Japonlarin gözüyle “1453” - yamada torajirō ve istanbul’un fethi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 32. https://ajindex.com/articles/1036421

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...