SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY

Meltem AKCA
Mübeyyen TEPE KÜÇÜKOĞLU
Pages
117–136
Publication Date
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to findings it was revealed out that conscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying and counterproductive work behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employee behaviors gets popular in today’s academic and business environment because of its impact on organizational outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Especially, increase of the dark attitudes of managers and colleagues towards the individuals, affects the formation of employees’ deviance behaviors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to findings it was revealed out that conscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying and counterproductive work behaviors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Workplace Bullying · Conscientiousness · Counterproductive Work Behaviors

Özet

Employee behaviors gets popular in today’s academic and business environment because of its impact on organizational outcomes. Especially, increase of the dark attitudes of managers and colleagues towards the individuals, affects the formation of employees’ deviance behaviors. In this context, workplace bullying is considered as one of the types of destructive approaches in organizations that excluding someone in social environment or influencing co-workers job sustainability with the harassment and offending emotions. Rising of workplace bullying in organizations leads employees to demonstrate negative behaviors which are defined as counterproductive work behaviors. On the other side, personality traits of an employee may have a major role in transformation of perception of negative attitudes towards to the work outcomes. For this reason, it was aimed to find out the role of conscientiousness, one of the personality traits of Five Factor Model, in the interaction between workplace bullying and counterproductive work behaviors. Statistical analyzes were made with the participation of 204 employees of a logistics company. According to findings it was revealed out that conscientiousness has a moderation role in the interaction between workplace bullying and counterproductive work behaviors.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKCA, M., KÜÇÜKOĞLU, M. T. (2020). RELATIONS BETWEEN WORKPLACE BULLYING, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOURS: A STUDY AT LOGISTICS COMPANY. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 117–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/103525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abas, C., Omar, F., Halim, F. W., & Hafidz, S. W. M. (2015). The mediating role of organizational-based self-esteem in perceived organizational support and counterproductive work behaviour relationship. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(9), 99-108.
  2. Abdullah, A., & Halim, F. W. (2016). The influence of work ethic and counterproductive work behaviour of civil servants. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 3(1), 1-14.
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
  4. Akgündüz, Y., and Akdağ, G. (2014). İşgörenlerin kişilik özelliklerinin temel benlik değerlendirmelerine ve işten ayrılma niyetlerine etkisi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(24), 295-318.
  5. Ayoko, O., Callan, V. and Härtel, C. (2003),
  6. Workplace Conflict, Bullying, and Counterproductive Behaviors. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 283-301.
  7. Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723–752.
  8. Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43-50.
  9. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
  10. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(2), 410-424.
  11. Berthelsen M, Skogstad A, Lau B, Einarsen S (2011) Do they stay or do they go? A longitudinal study of intentions to leave and exclusion from working life among targets of workplace bullying. Int J Manpower, 32(2), 178–193.
  12. Björkqvist, K, Österman, K. ve Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184
  13. Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107-121.
  14. Bolton, L. R., Becker, L. K., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 537-541.
  15. Bowling, N. A., Burns, G. N., Stewart, S. M., & Gruys, M. L. (201