SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

The Moderating Role of Emotional Contagion on the Relationship between Social Impact and Organizational Justice

Sosyal Etki ve Örgütsel Adalet Algısı İlişkisinde Duygusal Bulaşıcılığın Düzenleyici Rolü

Esra ZEYNEL
Kemal KÖKSAL
Pages
455–466
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it was determined that acceptance of social impact is a predictor of organizational justice and emotional contagion has a moderating role in this relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Identifying the antecedents of organizational justice which reveals significant result for organizational behaviors can provide effectively manage to employees’ attitudes and behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effect of social impact on the perception of organizational justice and the moderating role of emotional contagion in this relationship were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it was determined that acceptance of social impact is a predictor of organizational justice and emotional contagion has a moderating role in this relationship.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social impact · organizational justice · emotional contagion

Abstract

Identifying the antecedents of organizational justice which reveals significant result for organizational behaviors can provide effectively manage to employees’ attitudes and behavior. In this study, the effect of social impact on the perception of organizational justice and the moderating role of emotional contagion in this relationship were examined. The data were collected from academician by convenience sampling and face-to-face survey methods. SPSS and AMOS programs were used for analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the validity of the scales and, regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between the variables. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that acceptance of social impact is a predictor of organizational justice and emotional contagion has a moderating role in this relationship.

Özet

Örgütsel davranış açısından önemli sonuçları ortaya çıkaran örgütsel adalet kavramının oluşmasında etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesi, işyeri tutum ve davranışlarının daha etkin yönetilmesini sağlayacaktır. Bu araştırmada, sosyal etkinin örgütsel adalet algısına etkisi ve bu ilişkide duygusal bulaşma düzeyinin düzenleyici rolü incelenmiştir. Veriler, kolayda örnekleme ve yüz yüze anket metodu ile akademisyenlerden toplanmıştır. Veriler SPSS ve AMOS programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Ölçekler geçerliliğini test etmek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, değişkenler arası ilişkileri incelemek için ise regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda, sosyal etkiyi kabullenmenin örgütsel adaleti anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığı ve duygusal bulaşıcılığın bu ilişkide düzenleyici rolünün olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmacı ve uygulayıcılar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYNEL, E., KÖKSAL, K. (2020). The Moderating Role of Emotional Contagion on the Relationship between Social Impact and Organizational Justice. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 455–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/103120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz L (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
  2. Ambrose, M. L. ve Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 491–500.
  3. Ashkanasy, N. M. ve Ashton-James, C. E. (2005). Emotion in organizations: A neglected topic in I/O psychology, but with a bright future. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 20, 221-268.
  4. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1998). Carl Rogers’ helping system: Journey and substance. London: Sage. Bartle, S. A. ve Hays, B. C. (1999). Organizational justice and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. The Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA. Bies, R. J. ve Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communicating criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, ve M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations. 1, 43-55.
  5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  6. Bies, R. J. ve Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. InR.M.Kramer ve T.Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations, 246-260.
  7. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wile Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
  8. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
  9. Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. ve Ng K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A Meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
  10. Cropanzano, R. ve Greenberg, J., (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper ve I. T. Robertson (Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 317–372. New York: Wiley Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
  11. Dirks, K. T. ve Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trustinleadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
  12. Dailey, R. C., ve Kirk, D. J. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job dissat