SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

The Advocacy Coalition Framework and Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to European Union Policies

SAVUNUCULUK KOALİSYONU ÇERÇEVESİ VE AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ POLİTİKALARI İÇİN UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ

Can ÇİNER
Elifcan ALTINIŞIK
Pages
405–436
Publication Date
2023-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

First, ACF will be analyzed descriptively and second, the framework for the European Union will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Advocacy Coalition Framework is one of the most widely used scientific frameworks on national and supranational public policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to being the subject of the most academic studies in order to understand multi-level and complex public policies, the ACF is a scientific framework that contributes to the development of knowledge in the field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:First, ACF will be analyzed descriptively and second, the framework for the European Union will be discussed.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Advocacy Coalition Framework is one of the most widely used scientific frameworks on national and supranational public policies. In addition to being the subject of the most academic studies in order to understand multi-level and complex public policies, the ACF is a scientific framework that contributes to the development of knowledge in the field. The article aims to discuss whether the ACF can be an explanatory framework for European Union policies. First, ACF will be analyzed descriptively and second, the framework for the European Union will be discussed.

Özet

Savunuculuk Koalisyonu Çerçevesi (SKÇ), ulusal ve ulusüstü kamu politikalarıkonusunda alanyazının sıklıkla başvurduğu bilimsel çerçevelerden biri olarak kabuledilmektedir. SKÇ, çok düzeyli ve karmaşık kamu politikalarını anlamak için üzerindeen çok akademik çalışma yapılan konu olmasının yanı sıra, alandaki birikimingeliştirilmesine katkı sunan bilimsel bir çerçeve olma özelliği taşımaktadır. Makale,SKÇ’nin Avrupa Birliği politikaları için açıklayıcı bir çerçeve olup olamayacağınıtartışmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu kapsamda, SKÇ öncelikle betimsel olarak ele alınacak,ardından Avrupa Birliği çerçevesinde değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİNER, C., ALTINIŞIK, E. (2023). The Advocacy Coalition Framework and Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework to European Union Policies. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 405–436. https://ajindex.com/articles/1023055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Anderson, James. Public Policy Making, 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1979.
  2. Brooks, Eleanor. “Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand EU Pharmaceutical Policy.”, European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 28, Supplement 3 (2018): 11-14.
  3. Cairney, Paul. “Paul A. Sabatier, ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of PolicyOriented Learning Therein.’” İçinde The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration, editörler Martin Lodge, Edward. C. Page, ve Steven. J. Balla, 1-16. Oxford Handbooks Online, 2015.
  4. Çiner, Can Umut, “Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Politikası”, Kamu Politikası: Kuram ve Uygulama, M. Yıldız, M. Z. Sobacı (ed.), (Adres Yayınları, 2013), 298-319.
  5. Demirci, Süleyman. “İşbirlikçi Tarafgirlik Modeli.” İçinde Kamu Politikası Süreci: Teorik Perspektifler, Modeller ve Analiz Yöntemleri, editör Alican Kaptı, 145- 158. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2013.
  6. Dudley, Geoff ve Jeremy Richardson. “Competing Advocacy Coalitions and The Process of ‘Frame Reflection’: A Longitudinal Analysis of EU Steel Policy. ” Journal of European Public Policy 6, no 2 (1999): 225-248.
  7. Easton, David. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley, 1965.
  8. Feindt, Peter H. “Policy-learning and Environmental Policy Integration in the Common Agricultural Policy, 1973-2003.” Public Administration 88, no 2 (2010): 296-314.
  9. Fenger, Monno ve Pieter-Jan Klock. “Interdependency, Beliefs, and Coalition Behavior: A Contribution to the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Policy Science 34, no 2 (2001): 157-170.
  10. Heclo, Hugh. Social Policy in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.
  11. Heclo, Hugh. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” İçinde, The New American Political System, editör Anthony King, 87-124.
  12. Washington, DC: AEI, 1978.
  13. Heywood, Andrew. Siyaset. Ankara: Liberte, 2006.
  14. Jenkins-Smith, Hank ve Paul A. Sabatier. “The Study of Public Policy Processes.” İçinde Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, editörler Paul A. Sabatier ve Hank Jenkins-Smith,1-9.
  15. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993a.
  16. Jenkins-Smith, Hank ve Paul A. Sabatier. “The Dynamics of Policy-Oriented Learning.” İçinde Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, editörler Paul A. Sabatier ve Hank Jenkins-Smith, 41-56.
  17. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1993b.
  18. Jones, Charles. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. 3d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1977.
  19. Kübler, Daniel, Jacques de Maillard, Analyser les politiques publiques, Presse