Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

An Overview of Turkish Social Security Law in the Light of Non discrimination Principle on the Grounds of Nationality in EU Law

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN VATANDAŞLIĞA DAYALIAYRIMCILIK YASAĞI PERSPEKTİFİNDENTÜRKİYE’DE SOSYAL GÜVENLİK MEVZUATINABAKIŞ

Pages
401–438
Publication Date
2023-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to assessstatutory social security regulations applied in Turkey inside of theEuropean Union non-discrimination principle on the grounds of nationality.The practices that generate differences on the grounds of nationality arepointed out, and it is concluded that alternative scenarios need to beconsidered soon.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the negotiations of the Treaty of Rome, it was foreseen that theprobability of individuals losing their social security rights could be aserious obstacle before the exercise of free movement rights.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bearing this inmind, the protection of social security rights was evaluated in view theprohibition of discrimination on the grounds of nationality, and socialsecurity coordination rules came into force, as the first substantialregulation of the European Union.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to assessstatutory social security regulations applied in Turkey inside of theEuropean Union non-discrimination principle on the grounds of nationality.The practices that generate differences on the grounds of nationality arepointed out, and it is concluded that alternative scenarios need to beconsidered soon.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

During the negotiations of the Treaty of Rome, it was foreseen that theprobability of individuals losing their social security rights could be aserious obstacle before the exercise of free movement rights. Bearing this inmind, the protection of social security rights was evaluated in view theprohibition of discrimination on the grounds of nationality, and socialsecurity coordination rules came into force, as the first substantialregulation of the European Union. The purpose of this study is to assessstatutory social security regulations applied in Turkey inside of theEuropean Union non-discrimination principle on the grounds of nationality.The practices that generate differences on the grounds of nationality arepointed out, and it is concluded that alternative scenarios need to beconsidered soon.

Özet

Roma Antlaşması müzakerelerinde, bireylerin sosyal güvenlik haklarınıkaybetme olasılıklarının, serbest dolaşım hakkının kullanılması önünde ciddi bir engel olabileceği öngörülmüştür. Bu durum göz önünde bulundurularak, sosyal güvenlik hakkının korunması vatandaşlığa dayalı ayrımcılık yasağıçerçevesinde değerlendirilmiş ve Avrupa Birliği’nin ilk kapsamlıdüzenlemesi olan sosyal güvenlik koordinasyon kuralları yürürlüğe girmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de uygulanmakta olan zorunlu sosyal güvenlik düzenlemelerinin, Avrupa Birliği’nin vatandaşlığa dayalıayrımcılık yasağı ilkesi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesidir. Bu kapsamda vatandaşlığa dayalı farklılık yaratan uygulamalara dikkat çekilmekte ve bugünden alternatif senaryoların tartışılmaya başlanması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDER, Z., ÖZ, G. A. (2023). An Overview of Turkish Social Security Law in the Light of Non discrimination Principle on the Grounds of Nationality in EU Law. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 401–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/1023050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Alper, Yusuf. Sosyal Sigortalar Hukuku. 10. Baskı. Bursa: Dora Yayınevi, 2019.
  2. Arıcı, Kadir. Türk Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi Yayınları, 2015.
  3. Berghman, Jos. “Basic concepts of social security.” İçinde Social security in Europe: Miscellanea of the Erasmus programme of studies relating to social security in the EC, editör Danny Pieters, 10-11. Brussels: Bruylant, 1991.
  4. Borjas, George J. “The labor demand curve is downward sloping: reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no 4 (2003): 1335-1374.
  5. Bozkurt, Enver. Özcan, Mehmet. ve Köktaş, Arif. Avrupa Birliği Hukuku. Ankara: Asil Yayınları, 2004.
  6. Caniklioğlu, Nurşen. “Sosyal Hukukta Ayrımcılık Olarak Değerlendirilebilecek Düzenlemeler ve Mağduriyetin Giderilmesi İçin Başvurulabilecek Yollar.” İçinde İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Türk Milli Komitesi 30. Yıl Armağanı, 643-700. Ankara: TŞOF Plaka Matbaası, 2006. Case C-349/87 Elissavet Paraschi v. Landesversicherungsanstalt Württemberg [1991] ECR I-04501. Case C-7/75 Mr. and Mrs. Fracas v. Belgian State [1975] ECR I- 679. Case C-226/91 Molenbroek v. Sodale Verzekeringsbank [1992] ECR I-5943. Case C-343/92 M. A. De Weerd, née Roks and others v. Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen and others. [1994] ECR I-571. Case C-444/93 Ursula Megner and Hildegard Scheffel v. Innungskrankenkasse Vorderpfalz, now Innungskrankenkasse Rheinhessen-Pfalz [1995] ECR I4741. Case C-237/94 John O'Flynn v. Adjudication Officer [1996] ECR I-02617. Case C-277/94 Z. Taflan (Met), S. Altun-Baser, E. Andal Bugdaycı v. Bestuur van de Sociale and O. Akol v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging [1996] ECR I-04085. Case C-262/96 Sema Sürül v. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit [1996] ECR I-2685. Case C-55/00 Elide Gottardo v. Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) [2002] ECR I-413. Case C-373/02 Sakir Öztürk v. Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter [2004] ECR I-3605. Case C-555/07 Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex GmbH & Co. KG. [2010] ECR I00365. Case C-236/09 Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and Others v. Conseil desministres [2011] ECR I- 00773. Demir, Müslim. “Türkiye’de Yabancıların Sosyal Güvenliği.” SGD-Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi 6, no 1 (2016): 70-93.
  7. Dustmann, Christian ve Tommaso, Frattini. The Fiscal Effects of Immigration to the UK. London: CReAM Discussion Paper Series no 22/13, 2013. Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 1