SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: Özel

POSSIBLE MODEL(S) FOR POST-BREXIT EU-UK RELATIONS IN LIGHT OF EXISTING CONSTRAINTS IN EU LAW

“AB Hukuku Kısıtları Işığında Brexit Sonrası AB-Birleşik Krallık İlişkileri İçin Olası Model(ler)”

Narin IDRİZ
Pages
35–68
Publication Date
2024-01-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even though these boundaries are far from being clear and precise, they will nevertheless help eliminate some of the pre-existing relationship models, leaving us with the possible options, which could be further adapted to suit the needs of the future relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to identify the constraints flowing from EU law that will limit both the content and form of the post-Brexit EU-UK relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These legal constraints will reveal what the room for manoeuvre will be in determining the future relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even though these boundaries are far from being clear and precise, they will nevertheless help eliminate some of the pre-existing relationship models, leaving us with the possible options, which could be further adapted to suit the needs of the future relationship.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to identify the constraints flowing from EU law that will limit both the content and form of the post-Brexit EU-UK relationship. These legal constraints will reveal what the room for manoeuvre will be in determining the future relationship. Determining what lies within and outside the boundaries set by these constraints will help shed light on the possible future models on which this relationship could be based. Even though these boundaries are far from being clear and precise, they will nevertheless help eliminate some of the pre-existing relationship models, leaving us with the possible options, which could be further adapted to suit the needs of the future relationship.

Özet

Bu makale AB hukukundan kaynaklanan ve gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkilerinin dayanacağı anlaşmayı içerik ve şekil bakımından kısıtlayacak olan etmenleri ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu hukuki kısıtlar gelecekte müzakere edilecek olan anlaşma için tarafların sahip olduğu manevra alanının sınırlarını belirleyecektir. Bu sınırları belirlemekle hangi ilişki modellerinin gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkileri için seçenekler arasında olup hangilerinin olamayacağını tespit etmek mümkün olacaktır. Hâlihazırda var olan bazı ilişki modellerinin elenmesi, hangi modeller üzerinde odaklanılması ve gerekirse hangilerinin adapte edilip gelecekteki AB-BK ilişkileri için temel oluşturabileceğini ortaya koyacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

IDRİZ, N. (2024). POSSIBLE MODEL(S) FOR POST-BREXIT EU-UK RELATIONS IN LIGHT OF EXISTING CONSTRAINTS IN EU LAW. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: Özel, 35–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/1023048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Allee, Todd, Manfred Elsig, and Andrew Lugg. "Is the European Union Trade Deal with Canada New or Recycled? A Text-as-Data Approach." Global Policy 8, no. 2 (2017): 246-52.
  2. Bradley, Curtis A., and Trevor W. Morrison. "Presidential Power, Historical Practice, and Legal Constraint." Columbia Law Review 113 (2013): 1097-161. Brexit and the Backstop: Everything You Need to Know. UK in a Changing Europe (https://ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-and-the-backstop-everything-you-need-to-know/: 11 February 2019).
  3. Castillo de la Torre, Fernando. "Opinion 1/00, Proposed Agreement on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area." Common Market Law Review 39, no. 6 (2002): 1373-93.
  4. Contartese, Cristina. "The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the Ecj’s External Relations Case Law: From the “Essential” to the “Specific Characteristics” of the Union and Back Again." Common Market Law Review 54 (2017): 1627-71.
  5. Craig, Paul. "Constitutions, Constitutionalism and the European Union." European Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2001): 125-50.
  6. Cuyvers, Armin. "The Confederal Comeback: Rediscovering the Confederal Form for a Transnational World." European Law Journal 19, no. 6 (2013): 711-38.
  7. Dashwood, Alan. "States in the European Union." European Law Review 23 (1998): 201-16.
  8. Disdier, Anne-Celia, and Keath Head. "The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade." The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 1 (2008): 37-48.
  9. Fahey, Elaine. "CETA and the Global Governance Law: What Kind of Model Agreement Is It Really in Law?". European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 293-302.
  10. Fallon, Richard H. "Constitutional Constraints." California Law Review 97, no. 4 (2009): 975-1037.
  11. Garner, Bryan A. Black's Law Dictionary. 8 ed. USA: Thomson-West, 2007. ———. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. 2 ed.: OUP, 2001.
  12. Grigonis, Simas. "Investment Court System of CETA: Adverse Effects on the Autonmy of EU Law and Possible Solutions." International Comparative Jurisprudence 5, no. 2 (2019): 127-41.
  13. Kassoti, Eva. "The Council v. Front Polisario Case: The Court of Justice’s Selective Reliance on International Rules on Treaty Interpretation." European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 23-42. ———. "The Front Polisario v. Council Case: The General Court, Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit and the External Aspect of European Integration (First Part)." European Papers 2, no. 1 (2017): 339-56.
  14. Kirkpatrick, Betty. The Cassel Concise English Dictionary. London: Cassel Publishers Limited, 1989.
  15. Klabbers, Jan. "Völkerrechtsfreund