Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Nociception Monitoring

Nosisepsiyonun Monitörizasyonu

Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2023-11-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this review is to provide information about no- ciception monitoring techniques, which are increasingly used in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tissue damage and inflammation-induced nociception during surgery are the primary reasons for administering general anes- thesia to the patient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During general anesthesia, analgesics in- hibit autonomic and somatic responses, hypnotic agents prevent awareness, and neuromuscular blocking agents inhibit reflex movements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this review is to provide information about no- ciception monitoring techniques, which are increasingly used in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tissue damage and inflammation-induced nociception during surgery are the primary reasons for administering general anes- thesia to the patient. During general anesthesia, analgesics in- hibit autonomic and somatic responses, hypnotic agents prevent awareness, and neuromuscular blocking agents inhibit reflex movements. Careful monitoring of the effects of general anes- thesia is necessary to avoid over- or under-dosing of anesthetics and thus to prevent associated complications and adverse effects. In general, hemodynamic parameters have been used to guide the intraoperative administration of analgesics such as opioids, but hemodynamic parameters are not standardized and cannot always provide a clear assessment. There is growing interest in techniques that can objectively monitor the analgesic component of anesthesia to achieve an appropriate balance of nociception and anti-nociception and to guide analgesic administration. The purpose of this review is to provide information about no- ciception monitoring techniques, which are increasingly used in clinical practice.

Özet

Cerrahi sırasında oluşan doku hasarı ve enflamasyon ile indükle- nen nosisepsiyon, hastaya genel anestezi uygulamanın birincil ne- denidir. Genel anestezi sırasında, analjezikler otonomik ve soma- tik tepkileri, hipnotik ajanlar farkındalığı ve nöromüsküler bloker ajanlar da refleks hareketleri önler. Genel anestezinin etkilerinin dikkatle izlenmesi anesteziklerin gereğinden az veya fazla dozda verilmesinden kaçınmak ve dolayısıyla ilişkili komplikasyonları ve olumsuz etkileri önlemek için gereklidir. Genel olarak, opioidler gibi analjeziklerin intraoperatif uygulanmasına rehberlik etmek için hemodinamik parametreler kullanılmıştır, ancak hemodina- mik parametreler standardize edilmemiştir ve her zaman net bir değerlendirme sağlayamaz. Uygun bir nosisepsiyon ve anti-nosi- sepsiyon dengesi sağlamak ve analjezik uygulamasını yönlendir- mek için, anestezinin analjezi bileşenini objektif olarak izleyebile- cek tekniklere giderek artan bir ilgi vardır. Bu derlemenin amacı klinik pratikte giderek daha çok kullanılan nosisepsiyon izleme teknikleri hakkında bilgiler aktarmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, H., CANSABUNCU, S. (2023). Nociception Monitoring. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.67799

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lake A. Balanced anaesthesia 2005: Avoiding the transition from acute to chronic pain. South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2005;11(1):14-8
  2. Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Nociception, pain, negative moods and behavior selection. Neuron 2015;87(3):474-91
  3. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020;161(9):1976-82
  4. BrownEN,PavoneKJ,Naranjo M.Multimodal general anesthe- sia: Theory and practise. Anesth Analg 2018;127(5):1246-58
  5. Fields HL, Heinricher MM. Anatomy and physiology of a nociceptive modulatory system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1985;308(1136):361-74
  6. Lichtner G, Auksztulewicz R, Velten H, et al. Nociceptive activation in spinal cord and brain persists during deep general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2018;121(1):291-302
  7. Kox WJ, von Heymann C, Heinze J, Prichep LS, John ER, Rundshagen I. Electroencephalographic mapping during routine clinical practice: Cortical arousal during tracheal intubation? Anesth Analg 2006;102(3):825-31
  8. Rundshagen I, Schröder T, Prichep LS, John ER, Kox WJ. Changes in cortical electrical activity during induction of anaesthesia with thiopental/fentanyl and tracheal intubation: A quantitative electroencephalographic analysis. Br J Anaesth 2004;92(1):33-8
  9. Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Ueyama H, Mashimo T. Electroencephalographic bicoherence is sensitive to noxious stimuli during isoflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004;100(4):818-25
  10. Garcia PS, Kreuzer M, Hight D, Sleigh JW. Effects of noxious stimulation on the electroencephalogram during general anaesthesia: A narrative review and approach to analgesic titration. Br J Anaesth 2021;126(2):445-57
  11. Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med 2010;363(27):2638-50
  12. Prichep LS, Gugino LD, John ER, et al. The patient state index as an indicator of the level of hypnosis under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2004;92(3):393-9
  13. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing an aneshesia. Anesthesiology 1998;89(4):980-1002
  14. Viertio-Oja H, Maja V, Särkelä M, et al. Description of the entropy algorithm as applied in the datex-ohmeda S/5 entropy module. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48(2):154- 61
  15. Shoushtarian M, McGlade DP, Delacretaz LJ, Liley DT. Evaluation of the brain anaesthesia response monitor during anaesthesia for cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomised controlled