Journals / An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) / 2023 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

The effect of marketing and R&D expenditures on firm profitability and stock return: Evidence from BIST

Pages
35–45
Publication Date
2023-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While no statistically significant relationship was found between marketing expenditures and return on assets, there was a positive and significant relationship between marketing expenditures and return on equity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the effects of R&D and marketing expenditures of companies that force marketing and finance to act together on stock return, return on assets, and return on equity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, the quarterly frequency data of nine companies that were continuously traded in the BIST Technology Index between March 2009 and December 2020 were examined with panel-data analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While no statistically significant relationship was found between marketing expenditures and return on assets, there was a positive and significant relationship between marketing expenditures and return on equity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effects of R&D and marketing expenditures of companies that force marketing and finance to act together on stock return, return on assets, and return on equity. To this end, the quarterly frequency data of nine companies that were continuously traded in the BIST Technology Index between March 2009 and December 2020 were examined with panel-data analysis. In line with the purpose of the research, analyzes were carried out in three different models. First of all, we determined which tests should be performed on the models based on the cross-sectional dependence, homogeneity/heterogeneity, and panel unit root test results obtained for the established models. The results of panel least squares test carried out to determine the effect of R&D and marketing expenditures on stock return showed that the effect of R&D expenditures on stock return was not statistically significant while marketing expenditures had a positive and significant effect on stock return. Analyzes should be continued with cointegration tests according to the characteristics of the two models established to determine the effect of R&D and marketing expenditures on return on assets and return on equity. The results implied a positive and significant relationship between R&D expenditures and return on both assets and equity. While no statistically significant relationship was found between marketing expenditures and return on assets, there was a positive and significant relationship between marketing expenditures and return on equity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKEROĞLU, G., KARABOĞA, K. (2023). The effect of marketing and R&D expenditures on firm profitability and stock return: Evidence from BIST. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.11121/ijocta.2023.1238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Edeling, A., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. (2021). The Marketing–Finance Interface: A New Integrative Review of Metrics, Methods, and Findings and an Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(4), 857-876
  2. Lehmann, D. (2004). Metrics for Making Marketing Matter. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 73- 75
  3. Abramson, C., Currim, I., & Sarin, R. (2005). An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Information on Competitive Decision Making. Management Science, 51(2), 195-207
  4. Schulze, C., Skiera, B., & Wiesel, T. (2012). Linking Customer and Financial Metrics to Shareholder Value: The Leverage Effect in Customer-Based Valuation. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 17-32
  5. Mintz, O., Gilbride, T., Lenk, P., & Currim, I. (2021). The Right Metrics for Marketing-Mix Decisions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 32-49
  6. Rust, R., Tim, A., Gregory, S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. (2004). Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 76-89
  7. Sorescu, A., & Spanjol, J. (2008). Innovation's Effect on Firm Value and Risk: Insights from Consumer Packagingd Goods. Journal of Marketing, 72(2), 114-132
  8. Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., & Hanssens, D. (2009). Product Innovations, Advertising, and Stock Returns. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 24-43
  9. Tellis, G., Prabhu, J., & Chandy, R. (2009). Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3- 23
  10. Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. (2012). Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-147
  11. Yang, Z., Shi, Y., & Wang, B. (2015). Search Engine Marketing, Financing Ability and Firm Performance in E-commerce. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1106-1112
  12. Morgan, N., Jayachandran, S., Hulland, J., Kumar, B., Katsikeas, C., & Somosi, A. (2021). Marketing Performance Assessment and Accountability: Process and Outcomes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2), 462-481
  13. Klingenberg, B., Timberlake, R., Geurts, T., & Brown, R. (2013). The Relationship of Operational Innovation and Financial Performance—A critical Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 317-323
  14. Kald, M., & Nilsson, F. (2000). Performance Measurement at Nordic Companies. European Management Journal, 18(1), 113-127
  15. Fornell, C.