Journals / Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1

Decision making in the manufacturing environment using the technique of precise order preference

Pages
178–193
Publication Date
2023-03-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

TPOP method has the highest Spearman’s correlation value for three case studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wrong decisions in manufacturing systems can jeopardize the continuity of production and reduce productivity and efficiency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three case studies are presented to illustrate the use of the TPOP method to solve decision-making problems in manufacturing systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TPOP method has the highest Spearman’s correlation value for three case studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:TPOP · Manufacturing · Decision-Making

Abstract

Wrong decisions in manufacturing systems can jeopardize the continuity of production and reduce productivity and efficiency. The refore, it is ess ential to mak e the rig ht dec isions in solving the problems encountered in manufacturing environments. In the literature, there are many methods developed to be used in solving decision-making problems. The results of different methods used in solving the same problem are different from each other. Thus, the rankings obtained by the different methods to solve the same decision-making problem in the manufacturing environment are different. Different rankings obtained for the same problem cause inconsistencies and it is not easy to determine which sort of order is better. In this study, the use of the technique of precise order preference (TPOP) is proposed to solve the decision-making problems in manufacturing systems. Three case studies are presented to illustrate the use of the TPOP method to solve decision-making problems in manufacturing systems. The c ase studies show that the TPOP method can be used easily to solve decision-making problems in manufacturing systems. Furthermore, the consistencies of the multi-criteria decision-making methods used in this study are analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient values. TPOP method has the highest Spearman’s correlation value for three case studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNTAŞ, S., DERELİ, T., ERDOĞAN, Z. (2023). Decision making in the manufacturing environment using the technique of precise order preference. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 1, 178–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/1021264

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. REFERENCES [1] Groover M. Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing. 1st ed. India: Prentice Hall Press
  2. Rasmi SAB, Kazan C, Turkay M. A multi-criteria decision analysis to include environmental, social, and cultural issues in the sustainable aggregate pro- duction plans. Comput Ind Eng 2019
  3. 348–360.[CrossRef] [3] Su TS, Lin YF. Fuzzy multi-objective procure-ment/production planning decision problems for recoverable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 2015
  4. 396– 408. [CrossRef] [4] Boral S, Howard I, Chaturvedi SK, McKee K, Naikan VNA. A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approach for failure mode and effect analysis: An essential requirement for sustainable manufac-turing. Sustain Prod Consum 2020
  5. 14–32. [CrossRef] [5] Vazifehdan MN, Darestani SA. Green Logistics out-sourcing employing multi criteria decision making and quality function deployment in the petrochemi-cal industry. Asian J Shipp Logist 2019
  6. 243–254.[CrossRef] [6] Ervural BC, Ervural B, Kabak O. A group deci-sion making approach for the evaluation of flex-ible manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016
  7. 1329– 1334. [CrossRef] [7] Pagone E, Salonitis K, Jolly M. Automatically weighted high-resolution mapping of multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable manufacturing sys-tems. J Clean Prod 2020
  8. 120272. [CrossRef] [8] Yu C, Matta A, Semeraro Q. Group decision making in manufacturing systems: An approach using spa-tial preference information and indifference zone. J Manuf Syst 2020
  9. 109–125. [CrossRef] [9] Ghenai C, Albawab M, Bettayeb M. Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renew Energy 2020
  10. 580–597. [CrossRef] [10] Zhang H. Understanding the linkages: A dynamic sustainability assessment method and decision making in manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 2019
  11. 233–238. [CrossRef] [11] Sinha AK, Anand A. Development of sustainable supplier selection index for new product develop-ment using multi criteria decision making. J Clean Prod 2018
  12. 1587–1596. [CrossRef] [12] Stoycheva S, Marchese D, Paul C, Padoan S, Juhmani A, Linkov I. Multi-criteria decision analy-sis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. J Clean Prod 2018
  13. 257–272. [CrossRef] [13] Guo Y, Wang N, Xu ZY, Wu K. The internet of things-based decision support system for informa-tion processing in intelligent manufacturing us