✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
This work enhances previous studies on the performance comparison of the three codecs, by providing comparison results at Variable Bit Rates (VBR).
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This work presents a comparative analysis of Dirac, H.264 and HEVC video codecs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Encoding file sizes, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM) measurements and encoding times are compared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This work enhances previous studies on the performance comparison of the three codecs, by providing comparison results at Variable Bit Rates (VBR).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dirac · H.264 · HEVC
Abstract
This work presents a comparative analysis of Dirac, H.264 and HEVC video codecs. Encoding file sizes, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM) measurements and encoding times are compared. Akiyo, Stefan and Caesar video sequences are used for comparisons. This work enhances previous studies on the performance comparison of the three codecs, by providing comparison results at Variable Bit Rates (VBR).
🔖
Cite This Article
Özenli, D. (2016). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN DIRAC, H.264 AND HEVC VIDEO ENCODERS AT VARIABLE BIT RATES. Electrica, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 2017–2020. https://ajindex.com/articles/1017435