Journals / The European Research Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6 - November 2023

Assessment of chiropractic intervention influence on pain and life quality in cervicogenic headache afflicted office workers: a review

Pages
1493–1501
Publication Date
2023-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Through the comprehensive evaluation of existing literature and studies, this review seeks not only to elucidate the potential of chiropractic treatment in improving the life quality of office workers suffering from cervicogenic headaches, but also to stimulate further research in this essential yet under-explored area of study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cervicogenic headache, characterized by referred pain perceived in the head but originating from the cervical spine, is a prevalent non-migraine headache impacting a significant proportion of the global population, particularly office workers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, the review will delve into high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust maneuvers, a widely employed strategy in spinal manipulative therapy, an extension of chiropractic treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Through the comprehensive evaluation of existing literature and studies, this review seeks not only to elucidate the potential of chiropractic treatment in improving the life quality of office workers suffering from cervicogenic headaches, but also to stimulate further research in this essential yet under-explored area of study.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cervicogenic headache · office workers · chiropractic treatment

Abstract

Cervicogenic headache, characterized by referred pain perceived in the head but originating from the cervical spine, is a prevalent non-migraine headache impacting a significant proportion of the global population, particularly office workers. Recent studies have identified a co-occurrence of cervicogenic headaches with neck pain, often exacerbated by long hours of stationary sitting and computer use common in desk jobs. Despite the growing evidence supporting the effectiveness of chiropractic treatment in mitigating head and neck pain, a distinct gap persists in the literature concerning chiropractic interventions specifically targeting office workers suffering from cervicogenic headaches. This review aims to scrutinize the current literature on the effectiveness of chiropractic interventions on pain management and life quality improvement for office workers afflicted with cervicogenic headaches. Specifically, the review will delve into high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust maneuvers, a widely employed strategy in spinal manipulative therapy, an extension of chiropractic treatment. In the context of cervicogenic headaches, the link between the Rectus Capitis Posterior Minor (RCPM) muscle and the Dura Mater, and how neck strains affecting this connection can instigate headaches, will be explored. Through the comprehensive evaluation of existing literature and studies, this review seeks not only to elucidate the potential of chiropractic treatment in improving the life quality of office workers suffering from cervicogenic headaches, but also to stimulate further research in this essential yet under-explored area of study.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILTER, S. E., GÖKÇE, A. (2023). Assessment of chiropractic intervention influence on pain and life quality in cervicogenic headache afflicted office workers: a review. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6 - November 2023, 1493–1501. https://ajindex.com/articles/1015243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Chaibi A, Russell MB. Manual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2012;13:351-9
  2. Feleppa M, Fucci S, Bigal ME. Primary headaches in an elderly population seeking medical care for cognitive decline. Headache 2017;57:209-16
  3. Bogduk N. The anatomical basis for cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15:67-70
  4. Bryans R, Decina P, Descarreaux M, Duranleau M, Marcoux H, Potter B, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the chiropractic treatment of adults with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2014;37:42-63
  5. Côté P, Yu H, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Wong JJ, Mior S, et al. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain 2019;23:1051-70
  6. Dunning JR, Cleland JA, Waldrop MA, Arnot CF, Young IA, Turner M, et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42:5-18
  7. Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:959-68
  8. Haas M, Bronfort G, Evans R, Schulz C, Vavrek D, Takaki L, et al. Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of cervicogenic headache: a dual-center randomized controlledtrial. Spine J 2018;18:1741-54
  9. McCrory DC, Penzien DB, Hasselblad V, Gray RN. Evidence Report: Behavioral and Physical Treatments for Tension-type and Cervicogenic Headache. Des Moines (IA): Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research; 2001
  10. Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Gunzburg R. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:567-78
  11. Hack GD, Koritzer RT, Robinson WL, Hallgren RC, Greenman PE. Anatomic relation between the rectus capitis posterior minör muscle and the dura mater. Spine (PhilaPa 1976) 1995;20:2484-6
  12. Ariëns GAM, Bongers PM, Douwes M, Miedema MC, Hoogendoorn WE, van der Wal G, et al. Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2001;58:200-7
  13. Poochada W, Chaiklieng S. Ergonomic risk assessment among call center workers. Procedia Manufacturing 2015;3:4613-20
  14. Stovner LJ, Hagen K,