Journals / The European Research Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6 - November 2023

Comparison of different plerixafor-based strategies for adequate hematopoietic stem cell collection in poor mobilizers

Pages
1368–1379
Publication Date
2023-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients without any side effects, CD 34+ cell counts, the percentage of patients who were found eligible for autologous transplantation, the engraftment kinetics of the patients who underwent transplantation, and their overall survival results were compared between the two groups where G-CSF was used with plerixafor, or where plerixafor was used after isolated G-CSF following chemotherapy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The main objective of the present study was to evaluate whether the use of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or subsequent use of isolated G-CSF and then plerixafor following disease-specific chemotherapy, and whether it would allow for adequate peripheral stem cell collection in patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The retrospective study evaluated 54 patients with previous mobilization failure who were administered plerixafor in 2 centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients without any side effects, CD 34+ cell counts, the percentage of patients who were found eligible for autologous transplantation, the engraftment kinetics of the patients who underwent transplantation, and their overall survival results were compared between the two groups where G-CSF was used with plerixafor, or where plerixafor was used after isolated G-CSF following chemotherapy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Autologous stem cell transplantation · mobilization · plerixafor

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of the present study was to evaluate whether the use of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or subsequent use of isolated G-CSF and then plerixafor following disease-specific chemotherapy, and whether it would allow for adequate peripheral stem cell collection in patients. Methods: The retrospective study evaluated 54 patients with previous mobilization failure who were administered plerixafor in 2 centers. In patients without any side effects, CD 34+ cell counts, the percentage of patients who were found eligible for autologous transplantation, the engraftment kinetics of the patients who underwent transplantation, and their overall survival results were compared between the two groups where G-CSF was used with plerixafor, or where plerixafor was used after isolated G-CSF following chemotherapy. Results: The median age of the patients was 49 years (range: 17-70), and 64.8% (n = 35) were males. It was identified that 31 (57.4%) patients underwent mobilization treatment with isolated G-CSF and plerixafor, and 23 (42.6%) patients underwent mobilization treatment with chemotherapy plus G-CSF and plerixafor. In all patients, mean hemoglobin level (11.3 ± 1.5 g/dL vs. 9.3 ± 1.3 g/dL; p < 0.001) and median platelet level (129.2 ×103/µL vs. 58.4 ×103/µL) were found to be higher, while febrile neutropenia rate (3.3% vs. 60.9%), the percentage of replacement patients (6.7% vs. 65.2%), and median days of G-CSF (6 vs. 9) were found to be lower on the day of plerixafor administration in the isolated G-CSF and plerixafor group compared to the chemotherapy and G-CSF and plerixafor group. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that administration of plerixafor is generally safe and well-tolerated. Regardless of the underlying disease, it offers an effective alternative for patients with previous failed mobilization attempts using conventional regimens, and allows stem cell collection with fewer apheresis sessions.

🔖

Cite This Article

SADRİ, S., HİNDİLERDEN, İ. Y., MUTLU, Y. G., TİRYAKİ, T. O., GEMİCİ, A. İ., BEKOZ, H. S., SEVİNDİK, Ö. G., HİNDİLERDEN, F., KALAYOĞLU-BEŞIŞIK, S., NALÇACI, M., SARGIN, D. (2023). Comparison of different plerixafor-based strategies for adequate hematopoietic stem cell collection in poor mobilizers. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 6 - November 2023, 1368–1379. https://ajindex.com/articles/1015230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H. Trends of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the third millennium. Curr Opin Hematol 2009;16: 420-6
  2. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, et al. High dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1875-83
  3. Villanueva ML, Vose JM. The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2006;4:521-30
  4. Baldomero H, Grathwohl M, Gratwhol A, Tichelli A, Niederwiser D, Madrigal, A, et al. European group for blood and Marrow transplantation EBMT. The EBMT activity survey 2009:trends over the past 5 years. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011;46:485-501
  5. Wuchter P, Ran D, Bruckner T, Schmit T, Witzens-Harig M, Neben K, et al. Poor mobolization of hematopoietic stem cells-definitions, incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010;16:490-9
  6. Bender JG, To LB, William S, Schwartzberg LS. Defining a therapeutic dose of peripheral blood stem cells. Hematother1992;1:329-41
  7. Passos-Coelho JL, Braine HG, Davis JM, Huelskamp AM, Schepers KG, Ohly K, et al. Predictive factors for peripheral blood progenitor cell collections using a single large volume leukopheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor mobilization. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:705-14
  8. Gandhi MK, Jestice K, Scott MA, Bloxham D, Bass G, Marcus RE. The minimum CD34 threshold depends on prior chemotherapy in autologous peripheral blood stem cell recipient. Bone Marrow Transplant1999;23:9-13
  9. Montgomery M, Cottler-Fox M. Mobolization and collection autologous hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2007;5:127-36
  10. Limat S, Woronoff-Lemsi MC, Milpied N, Chartrin I, Ifrah N, Deconinck E, et al Groupe Ouest Est d’etude des Leucemies et Autres Maladies du Sang(GOELAMS). Effect of cell cell determinant CD34+ cell dose on the cost and consequences of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients in front line therapy. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:2360-7
  11. Morris CL, Siegel E, Barlogie B, Cottler Fox M, Lin P, Fassas A, et al. Mobolization of CD34+ cells in eldely patients (>70 years) with multiple myeloma: influence of age, prior therapy, platelet count and mobilization regimen. Br J Haematol 2003;120:413-23
  12. Lee JL, Kim SB, Lee GW, Ryu MH, Kim EK, KİM S, et al. Collection of peripheral blood progeni