SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 3

UTERUS SPARING PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE SURGERY

UTERUS KORUYUCU PELVİK ORGAN PROLAPSUS TEDAVİSİ

Funda GÜNGÖR UĞURLUCAN
Cenk YAŞA
Ercan BAŞTU
Özlem DURAL
Önay YALÇIN
Pages
59–64
Publication Date
2013-05-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to discuss the most commonly used uterus preserving surgical techniques for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pelvik organ prolapse is a common condition affecting women of all ages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contemporary women postpone their pregnancies to their late 30’s and prefer to preserve their fertility in advanced years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to discuss the most commonly used uterus preserving surgical techniques for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pelvik organ prolapsusu · Histerektomi · Ürojinekoloji

Abstract

Pelvik organ prolapse is a common condition affecting women of all ages. Contemporary women postpone their pregnancies to their late 30’s and prefer to preserve their fertility in advanced years. Therefore, uterus preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery has gained wide acceptance. Surgical techniques including abdominal (open, laparoscopic, robotic) or vaginal methods may be preferred. The aim of this review is to discuss the most commonly used uterus preserving surgical techniques for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Özet

Pelvik organ prolapsusu kadınlarda çok sık rastlanan ve her yaşta görülebilen bir sorundur. Günümüzde kadınlar, gebeliği 30’lu yaşların sonlarına ertelemekte ve ilerleyen yaşlarda da doğurganlıklarını korumayı tercih etmektedir. Dolayısıyla günümüzde pelvik organ prolapsus tedavisinde uterus koruyucu cerrahi ön plana çıkmaktadır. Uterus koruyucu cerrahi teknikler arasında abdominal (açık, laparoskopik veya robotik) veya vaginal yöntemler tercih edilebilir. Bu derlemenin amacı pelvik organ prolapsusunun tedavisinde en sık uygulanan ve uterusun korunduğu cerrahi tekniklerin tartışılmasıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞURLUCAN, F. G., YAŞA, C., BAŞTU, E., DURAL, Ö., YALÇIN, Ö. (2013). UTERUS SPARING PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE SURGERY. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 3, 59–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/100877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ; Members of Committees; Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:213-40.
  2. Achtari C, Dwyer PL. Sexual function and pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005;19:993–1008.
  3. Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinaryincontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 2007;370:1494–1499.
  4. Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957;64:355-60.
  5. Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O. The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;92:228-33.
  6. Chmielewski L, Walters MD, Weber AM, Barber MD. Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporraphy using clinically relevant definitions of success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 69.e1-8. Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M. Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol 2005;48:642–649.
  7. Constantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:1481-1487. de Landsheere L, Ismail S, Lucot JP, et al. Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years’ median follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 206:83e81–87e81. Dietz V, Schraffordt Koops SE, van der Vaart CH. Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:349 Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:286–292. Dökmeci F. Pelvik organ prolapsusu ve üriner inkontinansta tedavi seçenekleri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2005; 1: 32-36.