Journals / The Turkish Journal Of Occupational / Environmental Medicine and Safety / 2017 / Volume 2, Issue 1(4)

Evaluation of heavy metal levels of patients admitted to Ankara Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital in 2006

Pages
25–25
Publication Date
2017-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Heavy metal, occupationally exposure, lead

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the serum or urinary heavy metal levels of patients admitted to Ankara Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital in 2006 Method: The study subjects consisted the workers referred to our hospital for periodical medical examination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The medical records of these subjects between January 2016 and December 2016 were scanned and evaluated by means of lead, mercury, arsenic, manganese, nickel and cadmium levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Heavy metal, occupationally exposure, lead
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Evaluation of heavy metal levels of patients admitted to Ankara Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital in 2006

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the serum or urinary heavy metal levels of patients admitted to Ankara Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital in 2006 Method: The study subjects consisted the workers referred to our hospital for periodical medical examination. The medical records of these subjects between January 2016 and December 2016 were scanned and evaluated by means of lead, mercury, arsenic, manganese, nickel and cadmium levels. Findings: The number of patients whose whole blood lead level monitored was 3858 and %25 (n=973) of them exceed reference value (<10 µg/dl) of our laboratory. The mean lead value of all patients was 8,8 ug/dL. The number of patients whose blood mercury level monitored was 1078 and 6 (% 0,5) of them exceed reference value (<10 µg/L). The mean mercury value of all patients was 0,51 ug/L. The number of patients whose urinary arsenic level monitored was 2797 and % 4 (n=116) of them exceed reference value (<35 µg/). The mean arsenic value of all patients was 16,2 ug/L. The number of patients whose whole blood manganese level monitored was 2494 and 370 (%14) of them exceed reference value (4,2-16,5 µg/L). The mean manganese value of all patients was 11,5 ug/L. The number of patients whose serum nickel level monitored was 1680 and 14 (% 0.8) of them exceed reference value (0,6-7,5 µg/L). The mean nickel value of all patients was 0,03 ug/L. The number of patients whose whole blood cadmium level monitored was 1666 and 12 (% 0.7) of them exceed reference value (<5 ug/L). The mean cadmium value of all patients was 0,18 ug/L. Conclusion: We conclude that lead was the most common heavy element to exceed reference value in occupationally exposed workers and manganese and arsenic were other elements following lead. Keywords: Heavy metal, occupationally exposure, lead

🔖

Cite This Article

BAL, C., BÜYÜKŞEKERCİ, M., GÖK, G., YILMAZ, Ö. H. (2017). Evaluation of heavy metal levels of patients admitted to Ankara Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital in 2006. The Turkish Journal Of Occupational / Environmental Medicine and Safety, Volume 2, Issue 1(4), 25–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/1007954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ceylan Bal1, Murat Büyükşekerci2, Gamze Gök1, Ömer Hınç Yılmaz3 1Department of Biochemistry, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey 2Department of Pharmacology, Occupational Diseases Hospital, Ankara, Turkey 3Department of Public Health, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey