SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sürdürülebilir Havacılık Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

MATRIX METHOD TO CALCULATE COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY OF GAS TURBINE ENGINES WITH THE AID OF EMISSION DATA AND APPLICATION

Gaz Türbinli Motorların Yanma Veriminin Emisyon Verileri Kullanılarak Matris Yöntemi ile Çözümü ve Uygulaması

Yasin ŞÖHRET
T. Hikmet KARAKOÇ
Pages
39–43
Publication Date
2016-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Combustion efficiency of a turbofan engine is calculated by using developed matrix solution method and obtained to be 99.93%

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gas turbine engines are operated under test conditions before and after assembly when design process is over.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this sense, measured emission data is significant to determine combustion efficiency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Combustion efficiency of a turbofan engine is calculated by using developed matrix solution method and obtained to be 99.93%
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gaz türbini · emisyon · yanma verimi

Abstract

Gas turbine engines are operated under test conditions before and after assembly when design process is over. Pressure, temperature, mass flow value measured from different stations and emission data measured from outlet of exhaust are compared with solid model analysis results obtained by using various software and off-design parameters for validation. In this sense, measured emission data is significant to determine combustion efficiency. In this study, a novel matrix solution method is developed to calculate combustion efficiency with the aid of emission data. Combustion efficiency of a turbofan engine is calculated by using developed matrix solution method and obtained to be 99.93%

Özet

Gaz türbinli motorlar, tasarım aşaması tamamlandıktan sonra yanma odası, montaj öncesi ve montaj sonrası testlere tabi tutulur. Yanma odasının farklı noktalarından ölçülen basınç, sıcaklık, debi ve çıkış noktasından ölçülen emisyon değerleri, tasarım parametreleri ve farklı yazılımlar kullanılarak elde edilen katı model analiz sonuçlarıyla kıyaslanarak tasarım doğrulama çalışmaları gerçekleştirilir. Bu anlamda ölçülmüş olan emisyon verileri, yanma verimliliğinin belirlenmesi için önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında, ölçülen emisyon değerleri kullanılarak yanma veriminin hesabına ilişkin bir matris çözüm yöntemi geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen bu matris çözüm yöntemi kullanılarak, bir turbofan tipi uçak motorunun yanma verimi hesabı gerçekleştirilmiş ve yanma verim değeri %99,93 olarak bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞÖHRET, Y., KARAKOÇ, T. H. (2016). MATRIX METHOD TO CALCULATE COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY OF GAS TURBINE ENGINES WITH THE AID OF EMISSION DATA AND APPLICATION. Sürdürülebilir Havacılık Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 39–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/1006773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ballal, D.R., ve A.H. Lefebvre. “Combustion Performance of Gas Turbine Combustors Burning Alternative Fuels.” Journal of Energy 3, no. 1 (1979): 50–54. doi:10.2514/3.62407. Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels” (n.d.). doi:10.1520/d1655-15d. Beck, Jeannette P., Claire E. Reeves, Frank A.A.M. de Leeuw, ve Stuart A. Penkett. “The Effect of Aircraft Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone in the Northern Hemisphere.” Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics 26, no. 1 (1992): 1686(92)90257-l. doi:10.1016/0960 Bejan, Adrian, and David L Siems. “The Need for Exergy Optimization in Aircraft Development.” Exergy, An InternationalJournal 1, no. 1 (2001): 14–24. doi:10.1016/s1164-0235(01)00005-x. Conrado, A.C., Lacava, P.T. ve Filho, A.C.P., 2004. “Basic Design Principles for Gas Turbine Combustor”, 10th Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brezilya, 2004.
  2. Datta, A., and S.K. Som. “Combustion and Emission Characteristics in a Gas Turbine Combustor at Different Pressure and Swirl Conditions.” Applied Thermal Engineering 19, no. 9 (1999): 949–967. doi:10.1016/s1359- 4311(98)00102-1.
  3. Ekici, Selcuk, Gorkem Yalin, Onder Altuntas, and T. Hikmet Karakoc. “Calculation of HC, CO and NOx from Civil Aviation in Turkey in 2012.” International Journal of Environment and Pollution 53, no. 3/4 (2013): 232. doi:10.1504/ijep.2013.059919. Glassman, I. Yetter, R.A., Combustion (4th Edition), Elsevier Academic Press, ABD, 2008.
  4. Gohardani, Amir S. “A Synergistic Glance at the Prospects of Distributed Propulsion Technology and the Electric Aircraft Concept for Future Unmanned Commercial/military Aviation.” Progress in Aerospace doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.001. and Sciences 57 (2013): 25–70.
  5. Gürü, M. Yalçın, H., Stokiometri, Palme Yayıncılık, Cilt 1, Ankara, 519-524, 2012.
  6. ICAO, Doc 9646: ICAO Engine Exhaust Emissions Data Bank, 2013. İnternet, 2015, http://www.pw.utc.com/JT8D_Engine
  7. Kesgin, U. “Aircraft Emissions at Turkish Airports.” Energy 31, no. 2–3 (2006): 372–384. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.01.012. Lebedev, A.B., A.N. Secundov, A.M. Starik, N.S. Titova, and A.M. Schepin. “Modeling Study of Gas-Turbine Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 32, no. 2 Emission.” (2009): 2941–2947. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.015. Lee, S.H., M. Le Dilosquer, R. Singh, and M.J. Rycroft. “Further Considerations of Engine Emissions from Subsonic Aircraft at Cruise Altitude.” Atmospheric Environment 30, no. 22 (1996): 2310(96)00113-6. doi:10.1016/1352 Lee, Min Chul