Journals / Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP of HANDGRIP STRENGTH and HAND DIMENSIONS in ADOLESCENTS AGED BETWEEN 13-14 YEARS

13-14 YAŞ ARASI ADÖLESANLARDA EL BOYUTLARI İLE EL KAVRAMA KUVVETİNİN İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
9–19
Publication Date
2018-05-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, it was found that the handgrip strengths of the athletes were significantly higher than the non-athletes (p <0,01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of hand dimension on handgrip strength in adolescents aged 13-14 years who do or not play sports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 56 adolescents (28 athletes and 28 non-athletes) aged between 13-14 years volunteered to participate in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, it was found that the handgrip strengths of the athletes were significantly higher than the non-athletes (p <0,01).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:El Uzunluğu · El Kavrama Kuvveti · El Boyutları

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of hand dimension on handgrip strength in adolescents aged 13-14 years who do or not play sports. A total of 56 adolescents (28 athletes and 28 non-athletes) aged between 13-14 years volunteered to participate in this study. Body length (cm), body weight (kg), body mass index (kg / m2), handgrip strength and hand dimension were measured. Hand dimension, lenght and handgrip measurements were taken from the dominant hand of the volunteers SPSS v.24 program was used to evaluate the normality distributions of the data, the level of difference between the groups and the relation between them. As a result of this study, it was found that the handgrip strengths of the athletes were significantly higher than the non-athletes (p <0,01). However, there were no significant differences between the hand dimensions of the athletes compared to the non-athletes. When the relationship between the hand dimension and the strenght parameters is examined in adolescents, it is seen that as the hand length, the hand area and the hand circumference increase, strenght values also increase. There was a correlation between hand dimensions and handgrip strength values (p <0.001).

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı 13-14 yaş arası spor yapan ve yapmayan adölesanlarda el boyutlarının el kavrama kuvveti ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla 13-14 yaşları arasında en az 5 yıllık antrenman geçmişine sporcu (n=28) ve aynı yaş grubundaki sedanter bireyler (n=28) çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılmışlardır. Araştırmaya katılan gönüllülerin boy uzunluğu (cm), vücut ağırlığı(kg), vücut kitle indeksi (kg/m2), el kavrama kuvvetleri ve el boyutları ölçülmüştür. Ölçümler gönüllülerin dominant elinden alındı. Verilerin normallik dağılımları, gruplar arası farklılık düzeyleri ve aralarındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmek için SPSS v.24 programı kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırma sonucunda el kavrama kuvvetinin sporcularda, sedanterlere göre anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p<0,01). Bununla beraber sporcuların sedanterlere göre el boyutları arasında anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmamıştır. Adölesanlarda el boyutları ile kuvvet parametrelerinin ilişkisi incelendiğinde ise el uzunluk, alan ve çevresine dair boyutlar arttıkça kuvvet değerlerinin de arttığı görülmüştür. El boyutları ile el kavrama kuvveti değerleri arasında korelasyon tespit edilmiştir (p<0,001).

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIN, A., ÖZUS, Ç. B. Ö., MELEKOĞLU, T. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP of HANDGRIP STRENGTH and HAND DIMENSIONS in ADOLESCENTS AGED BETWEEN 13-14 YEARS. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 9–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/1006551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Fallahi, A., & Jadidian, A. (2011). The effect of hand dimensions, hand shape and some anthropometric characteristics on handgrip strength in male grip athletes and non-athletes. Journal of HumanKinetics, 29, 151-159.
  2. Firrell, J. C., & Crain, G. M. (1996). Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength? The Journal of Hand Surgery, 21(3), 397-401.
  3. Gönülateş, S., Öcal, K., Gelen, E., Göral, K., & Eren, E. (2006). 12–13 Yaş Erkek futbolcularla aynı yaş grubu sedanter erkek çocukların bazı fiziksel uygunluk parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması. 9. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 380. Häger‐Ross, C., & Rösblad, B. (2002). Norms for grip strength in children aged 4–16 years. Acta Paediatrica, 91(6), 617-625.
  4. Kalkavan, A., Zorba, E., Ağaoğlu, Ş. A., Karakuş, Ş., & Çolak, H. (1996). Farklı spor branşlarında bazı fiziksel uygunluk değerlerinin sedanter grupla karşılaştırılması. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 25-35.
  5. Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2012). Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods: From hypothesis to results (Vol. 42): John Wiley & Sons. Massy-Westropp, N., Rankin, W., Ahern, M., Krishnan, J., & Hearn, T. C. (2004). Measuring grip strength in normal adults: Reference ranges and a comparison of electronic and hydraulic instruments 1. Journal of Hand Surgery, 29(3), 514-519.
  6. Nag, A., Nag, P., & Desai, H. (2003). Hand anthropometry of Indian women. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 117, 260. Ng, G. Y., & Fan, A. C. (2001). Does elbow position affect strength and reproducibility of power grip measurements? Physiotherapy, 87(2), 68-72.
  7. Nicolay, C. W., & Walker, A. L. (2005). Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(7), 605-618.
  8. Powers, S. K., & Walker, R. (1982). Physiological and anatomical characteristics of outstanding female junior tennis players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53(2), 172-175.
  9. Quaine, F., Vigouroux, L., & Martin, L. (2003). Effect of simulated rock climbing finger postures on force sharing among the fingers. Clinical Biomechanics, 18(5), 385-388.
  10. Sevim, Y. (2002). Antrenman Bilgisi Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2(1). Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.
  11. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Visnapuu, M., & Jürimäe